<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with poll and politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/poll+politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'poll' and 'politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Australian Federal Election 2007 on November 24</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65537/Australian%2DFederal%2DElection%2D2007%2Don%2DNovember%2D24</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/14/2059084.htm&quot;&gt;And we&apos;re off&lt;/a&gt;! Prime Minister John Howard has set the date for the Australian Federal election as November 24th, meaning we&apos;re up for a long six-week campaign. With Kevin Rudd leading the PM by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/2007/09/11/reuters-poll-trend-4/&quot;&gt;between 16 to 18 points&lt;/a&gt; (depending on who you read) in recent opinion polls, this election seems the most likely to provide a change of Government since Howard was first elected 11 years ago. Antony Green&apos;s usual excellent election guide is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/guide/&quot;&gt;up and running here&lt;/a&gt;, along with an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/calculator/&quot;&gt;excellent calculator&lt;/a&gt; which shows which seats are up for grabs dependent on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://australianpolitics.com/elections/two-party/two-party-preferred.shtml&quot;&gt;2 party preferred&lt;/a&gt; swing. You might also want to check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/feature/0,,5012863,00.html&quot;&gt;Vote-O-Matic&lt;/a&gt;, a fun but entirely disposable quiz which aims to help you decide who you&apos;ll vote for. Metafilter&apos;s international readers unfamiliar with the Australian political scene will likely be scratching their heads when trying to figure out just what the hell is going on over here, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/&quot;&gt;this page offers a useful guide as a starting point&lt;/a&gt;. It can be handy to read over whether you&apos;re from outside Australia or a true blue Aussie yourself.

Some other excellent Australian election resources include;

Links to some of the contenders web pages;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alp.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Labor Party&lt;/a&gt; (plus the &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevin07.com.au/&quot;&gt;Kevin07&lt;/a&gt; website).
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberal.org.au/&quot;&gt;Liberal Party&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationals.org.au/&quot;&gt;The Nationals&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bobbrown.org.au/&quot;&gt;Greens&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org.au/&quot;&gt;Australian Democrats&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulinehanson.com.au/&quot;&gt;Pauline Hanson&apos;s United Australia Party&lt;/a&gt;

And here&apos;s some links to some excellent blogs which will no doubt continue to annoy the mainstream media throughout the campaign.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/&quot;&gt;Oz Politics&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollbludger.com/&quot;&gt;Poll Bludger&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://possumcomitatus.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;Possum Comitatus&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/&quot;&gt;The Road to Surfdom&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/&quot;&gt;Larvatus Prodeo&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/news/blogocracy/&quot;&gt;Tim Dunlop&apos;s Blogocracy&lt;/a&gt;

Mind you, the following two blogs are by mainstream media pundits, and right wing columnists Piers Ackerman and Andrew Bolt.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/piersakerman/index.php/dailytele/comments/warzone_whingers_suddenly_australian/&quot;&gt;Piers Ackerman&apos;s Blog&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/&quot;&gt;Andrew Bolt&apos;s blog.&lt;/a&gt;

And finally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com.au/election2007/&quot;&gt;Google&apos;s election guide&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/64752/Googling-the-Australian-Federal-Election&quot;&gt;seen previously on Metafilter&lt;/a&gt;.

The next six weeks are going to be long, grueling and if the  experts are to be believed, incredibly negative. Strap yourselves in, folks. It&apos;s going to be one hell of a ride. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65537</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alp</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australiandemocrats</category>
		<category>australiangreens</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>BedsAreBurning</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>BobBrown</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>election07</category>
		<category>greens</category>
		<category>internationalgreens</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>labor</category>
		<category>latham</category>
		<category>liberals</category>
		<category>nationals</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>paulinehanson</category>
		<category>PM</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>pollbludger</category>
		<category>possumcomitatus</category>
		<category>primeminister</category>
		<category>rodent</category>
		<category>rudd</category>
		<category>seinfeld</category>
		<category>theendofallthings</category>
		<category>worm</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Beyond Red and Blue, Republican and Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41935/Beyond%2DRed%2Dand%2DBlue%2DRepublican%2Dand%2DDemocrat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4646571"&gt;Understanding elections beyond the red and blue axis.&lt;/a&gt; Since 1987, the Pew Research center has been conducting a political survey that divides voters into various &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=949&quot;&gt;typologies &lt;/a&gt; based on core beliefs-- upbeats and disaffected, enterprisers and bystanders -- and tracking political opinions and votes.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=943&quot;&gt;biggest trends&lt;/a&gt; have been the rise of disadvantaged pro-government conservatives and the shift of the middle to the right.  Fortunately, there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://typology.people-press.org/typology/&quot;&gt;survey &lt;/a&gt;that will determine your type.  Where does the typical MeFi visitor fit? &lt;small&gt;(Hint from the typology: &quot;Liberals- Affluent and highly secular...ideologically consistent on social issues, foreign policy and the role of government..nearly four-in-10 cite the Internet as their main source of news.&quot;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41935</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 22:02:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>ideology</category>
		<category>pew</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>blahblahblah</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Federal Intervention in Schiavo Case Prompts Broad Public Disapproval</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40614/Federal%2DIntervention%2Din%2DSchiavo%2DCase%2DPrompts%2DBroad%2DPublic%2DDisapproval</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/PollVault/story?id=599622&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;Federal Intervention in Schiavo Case Prompts Broad Public Disapproval&lt;/a&gt; Blowback? &quot;The public, by 63 percent-28 percent, supports the removal of Schiavo&apos;s feeding tube, and by a 25-point margin opposes a law mandating federal review of her case. Congress passed such legislation and President Bush signed it early today....&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40614</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:36:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanpeople</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>schiavo</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>World fears new Bush era</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38795/World%2Dfears%2Dnew%2DBush%2Dera</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1394393,00.html"&gt;Guess what? Another poll (since MeFites enjoy them sooooo much)!&lt;/a&gt; This one is a take on how much the world trusts and loves Bush.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38795</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:52:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<category>world</category>
		<dc:creator>acrobat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The hell?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38777/The%2Dhell</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/19/poll/index.html"&gt;Nation split on Bush as uniter or divider.&lt;/a&gt; And 90% of CNN polls are half-mental.  Or something. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2005_01_16.html#002009&quot;&gt;Via TMW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38777</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:05:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Poll</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush down in polls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30937/Bush%2Ddown%2Din%2Dpolls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4049942"&gt;New poll: Bush sinking, Kerry surging&lt;/a&gt; Overall, 52 percent of those polled by NEWSWEEK say they would not like to see Bush serve a second term, compared to 44 percent who want to see him win again...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30937</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:22:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>JohnKerry</category>
		<category>Kerry</category>
		<category>newsweek</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Slagman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The tide is turning.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22957/The%2Dtide%2Dis%2Dturning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170"&gt;The tide is turning. &lt;/a&gt; A &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170&quot;&gt;new poll&lt;/a&gt; from the Pew Research Center indicates that the Bush Administration is losing support for a war against Iraq, with only 29% favoring war if U.N. inspectors fail to find weapons of mass destruction. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,879104,00.html&quot;&gt;Polls are looking considerably worse in Great Britain&lt;/a&gt;, where 47% of the public disapprove of an attack on Iraq, compared to just 30% in favor of such an attack. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/commons/story/0,9061,879196,00.html&quot;&gt;Blair is certain that he can get the British public to support war&lt;/a&gt;, however, even if Britain goes to war &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19221-2003Jan20.html&quot;&gt;without U.N. support&lt;/a&gt;.

 &lt;i&gt;&quot;When and if that time came, people would find the reasons acceptable and satisfactory &lt;b&gt;because there is no other route available to us.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22957</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:14:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8845/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="a href="&gt;In Their Own Words: &lt;/a&gt; Why Americans Approve or Disapprove of Bush.  Sample quote from one who approves:  &quot;Because he&apos;s from Texas &amp; so am I.&quot;  Sample from one who disapproves:  &quot;Because Bush is a weenie.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8845</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>approval</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Gallup</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>acridrabbit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/02/19/presidentialpoll.ap/index.html"&gt;Through rose-tinted spectacles?&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s media waffle for a quiet news day, and comes on the back of a wave of nostalgia, but Reagan&apos;s &quot;victory&quot; in this latest poll feels like the triumph of selective memory, and of the desire to reassociate the presidency with jelly-bean eating. (FDR trails in fifth, and there&apos;s no mention of Woodrow Wilson, though Carter and Nixon get a look-in.) Which makes me wonder: does the US have a clear sense of its history, as far as Presidents are concerned?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5900</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:26:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>presidents</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


