<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pollkatz</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pollkatz</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pollkatz' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:58:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:58:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Raw data</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30010/Raw%2Ddata</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzcontentpage.html"&gt;Professor Pollkatz&apos;s statistics.&lt;/a&gt; Interestings graphics on Bush approval/disapproval. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/image001.gif&quot;&gt;This one&lt;/a&gt;, for example, clearly proves that whenever Bush&apos;s approval was high, it was driven by an event (the two major events being September 11 and the Iraq war) and steadily declined afterwards. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/bushindexprobushtable.htm&quot;&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; shows that FOX polls consistently overrate Bush, while Zogby polls consistently underrate him. &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30010</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>pollkatz</category>
		<category>ratings</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>Eloquence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


