<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with polls and opinion</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/polls+opinion</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'polls' and 'opinion' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Do you like this post? a)Yes b)Of course c)How could I not? d)Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76350/Do%2Dyou%2Dlike%2Dthis%2Dpost%2DaYes%2DbOf%2Dcourse%2DcHow%2Dcould%2DI%2Dnot%2DdMaybe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/rethinking-public-opinion"&gt;Rethinking Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt; - the immense importance of public opinion polling in American politics, and the under-reported problems at the heart of the enterprise, combine to call for a serious critique of the polling industry, its assumptions, and its method  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>estimation</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>public</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Of course. Haven&apos;t we already done that?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33540/Of%2Dcourse%2DHavent%2Dwe%2Dalready%2Ddone%2Dthat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2539"&gt;Voice of a Superpower&lt;/a&gt; --Foreign Policy magazine puts together an interview with John &amp; Jane Q. Public on us, the world, terror, and stuff--based on our responses to public-opinion polls from a wide variety of sources.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33540</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>JaneQPublic</category>
		<category>JohnQPublic</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>public</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The tide is turning.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22957/The%2Dtide%2Dis%2Dturning</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170"&gt;The tide is turning. &lt;/a&gt; A &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=170&quot;&gt;new poll&lt;/a&gt; from the Pew Research Center indicates that the Bush Administration is losing support for a war against Iraq, with only 29% favoring war if U.N. inspectors fail to find weapons of mass destruction. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,879104,00.html&quot;&gt;Polls are looking considerably worse in Great Britain&lt;/a&gt;, where 47% of the public disapprove of an attack on Iraq, compared to just 30% in favor of such an attack. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/commons/story/0,9061,879196,00.html&quot;&gt;Blair is certain that he can get the British public to support war&lt;/a&gt;, however, even if Britain goes to war &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19221-2003Jan20.html&quot;&gt;without U.N. support&lt;/a&gt;.

 &lt;i&gt;&quot;When and if that time came, people would find the reasons acceptable and satisfactory &lt;b&gt;because there is no other route available to us.&lt;/b&gt;&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22957</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:14:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwbush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13331/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amconline.org/cgi-bin/release/viewnews.cgi?newsid1008995870,95728,"&gt;Here&apos;s what American Muslims think.&lt;/a&gt; What do you think?  They come off modestly better than they did in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/breaking/2001/1104/breaking2.htm&quot;&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt; conducted in England a month back.  But then, no embarrassing questions were asked this time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13331</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2001 18:26:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>OsamaBinLaden</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>Taliban</category>
		<dc:creator>Real9</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


