<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with polls and polling</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/polls+polling</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'polls' and 'polling' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Do you like this post? a)Yes b)Of course c)How could I not? d)Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76350/Do%2Dyou%2Dlike%2Dthis%2Dpost%2DaYes%2DbOf%2Dcourse%2DcHow%2Dcould%2DI%2Dnot%2DdMaybe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/rethinking-public-opinion"&gt;Rethinking Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt; - the immense importance of public opinion polling in American politics, and the under-reported problems at the heart of the enterprise, combine to call for a serious critique of the polling industry, its assumptions, and its method  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>estimation</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>public</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Querying the noosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74797/Querying%2Dthe%2Dnoosphere</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-35417520080910&quot;&gt;According to a recent international survey&lt;/a&gt;, there remains no global consensus regarding who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.  &quot;On average, 46 percent of those surveyed said al Qaeda was responsible, 15 percent said the U.S. government, 7 percent said Israel and 7 percent said some other perpetrator... The U.S. government was to blame, according to 23 percent of Germans and 15 percent of Italians.&quot;  The poll was collected by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldpublicopinion.org&quot;&gt;World Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt;, a neat website filled with various polls about interesting topics.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74797</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>germantruthers</category>
		<category>globalopinion</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<dc:creator>Baby_Balrog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What Muslims Really Think</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73638/What%2DMuslims%2DReally%2DThink</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104629/Who-Muslims.aspx&quot;&gt;Who are Muslims?&lt;/a&gt; Gallup has conducted a poll &quot;in 40 predominantly Muslim nations and among significant Muslim populations in the West. It is the first set of unified and scientifically representative views from 1.3 billion Muslims globally.&quot; They&apos;ll be parsing and interpreting this data for years, but for the time being, they&apos;ve offered some of their key results &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/consulting/worldpoll/26410/gallup-center-muslim-studies.aspx&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/press/104209/Who-Speaks-Islam-What-Billion-Muslims-Really-Think.aspx&quot;&gt;in print&lt;/a&gt;. See also, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.muslimwestfacts.com/MWF/26650/default.aspx&quot;&gt;Muslim-West Facts Initiative&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://interfaithradio.org/node/559&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;) Some excerpts:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104731/Muslims-Want-Democracy-Theocracy.aspx&quot;&gt;Do Muslims Want Democracy and Theocracy?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104941/What-Makes-Radical.aspx&quot;&gt;What Makes a Radical?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/105214/What-Muslim-Women-Want.aspx&quot;&gt;What Do Muslim Women Want?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/105700/Islam-West-Clash-Coexistence.aspx&quot;&gt;Islam and the West: Clash or Coexistence?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Initial results were published in 2006 in Foreign Policy: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.gallup.com/WorldPoll/PDF/MWSRRadical022207.pdf&quot;&gt;What Makes a Muslim Radical?&lt;/a&gt;&quot; in pdf. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73638</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:12:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beliefs</category>
		<category>data</category>
		<category>facts</category>
		<category>gallup</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>opinions</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15748/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2730-2002Mar22.html?referer=email"&gt;Polls&lt;/a&gt;  Come Under Fire.
Watchdog Group Issues Rebuke on Poll on Islamic Countries. Meanwhile, those bogus aggregates continue to circulate freely in this country and around the world.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15748</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:37:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>PublicOpinion</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10249/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28252-2001Sep13.html"&gt;Washington Post/ABC News Poll: Bush&apos;s approval rating at 87%&lt;/a&gt;  - I wonder if that rating is going to go on a roller-coaster ride similar to his father&apos;s.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10249</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>approval</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>popularity</category>
		<category>prescience</category>
		<category>sepiatones</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>mrbula</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3816/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pollingreport.com/election.htm"&gt;I just got polled for the presidential election&lt;/a&gt; . . .and they didn&apos;t even mention Nader&apos;s name as a choice for president! I had to tell them &apos;I am voting for Ralph Nader.&quot; Ralph is pulling 6% in recent national polls. This really gets me steamed that they don&apos;t include his name in the %#@*!! &lt;i&gt;polls.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3816</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2000 19:02:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>ralphnader</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>snakey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


