<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with polls and usa</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/polls+usa</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'polls' and 'usa' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New Poll: Public Would Significantly Alter Administration&apos;s Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40281/New%2DPoll%2DPublic%2DWould%2DSignificantly%2DAlter%2DAdministrations%2DBudget</link>
		<description> A new poll finds that the American public would significantly alter the Bush administration&#8217;s recently proposed federal budget. Presented a breakdown of the major areas of the proposed discretionary budget and given the opportunity to redistribute it, respondents made major changes. The most dramatic changes were deep cuts in defense spending, a significant reallocation toward deficit reduction, and increases in spending on education, job training, reducing reliance on oil, and veterans. These changes were favored by both Republicans and Democrats, though the changes were generally greater for Democrats.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/html/more_03_07_05.html#1&quot; title=&quot;The American public as a whole takes a fairly coherent position. They favor redirecting a portion of defense spending to deficit reduction and social spending and look for savings by cutting spending on large-scale Cold War style capabilities--not unlike Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld&#8212;and sizing capabilities on the assumption that the US will be acting together with allies, not on its own.&quot;&gt;What America Gets  Right&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/Report03_07_05.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;) via &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gadflyer.com/flytrap/index.php?Week=200510#1584&quot;&gt;The Gadflyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40281</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>opinionpolls</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USbudget</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yeah, but Oedipus didn&apos;t start a war.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36569/Yeah%2Dbut%2DOedipus%2Ddidnt%2Dstart%2Da%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guerrillanews.com/articles/article.php?id=761"&gt;Former Bush ghostwriter confirms Bush had plans for Iraq in 1999.&lt;/a&gt; Herskowitz said that Bush expressed frustration at a lifetime as an underachiever in the shadow of an accomplished father. In aggressive military action, he saw the opportunity to emerge from his father&#8217;s shadow. The moment, Herskowitz said, came in the wake of the September 11 attacks. &#8220;Suddenly, he&#8217;s at 91 percent in the polls, and he&#8217;d barely crawled out of the bunker.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36569</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:26:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>frustration</category>
		<category>herskowitz</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>lifetime</category>
		<category>oedipus</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>underachiever</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>RavinDave</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Of course. Haven&apos;t we already done that?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33540/Of%2Dcourse%2DHavent%2Dwe%2Dalready%2Ddone%2Dthat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=2539"&gt;Voice of a Superpower&lt;/a&gt; --Foreign Policy magazine puts together an interview with John &amp; Jane Q. Public on us, the world, terror, and stuff--based on our responses to public-opinion polls from a wide variety of sources.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33540</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:15:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>JaneQPublic</category>
		<category>JohnQPublic</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>public</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8845/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="a href="&gt;In Their Own Words: &lt;/a&gt; Why Americans Approve or Disapprove of Bush.  Sample quote from one who approves:  &quot;Because he&apos;s from Texas &amp; so am I.&quot;  Sample from one who disapproves:  &quot;Because Bush is a weenie.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8845</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:46:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>approval</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Gallup</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>acridrabbit</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/02/19/presidentialpoll.ap/index.html"&gt;Through rose-tinted spectacles?&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s media waffle for a quiet news day, and comes on the back of a wave of nostalgia, but Reagan&apos;s &quot;victory&quot; in this latest poll feels like the triumph of selective memory, and of the desire to reassociate the presidency with jelly-bean eating. (FDR trails in fifth, and there&apos;s no mention of Woodrow Wilson, though Carter and Nixon get a look-in.) Which makes me wonder: does the US have a clear sense of its history, as far as Presidents are concerned?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5900</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:26:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>presidents</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2913/</link>
		<description> Last week, Bush was &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/Election2000/default.htm&quot;&gt;up by 16 points&lt;/A&gt;. Today, Gore is &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/444994.asp&quot;&gt;up
by 3&lt;/A&gt;. Who are all of these &#8220;swing&#8221; voters that can&apos;t make
up their minds in the face of &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/resources/where.they.stand/index.html&quot;&gt;clear differences&lt;/A&gt; between the candidates?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2913</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:37:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>quirked</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2497/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/science/20000717/t000067009.html"&gt;We&apos;re all a bunch of ignorami.&lt;/a&gt;  Hooray! Hurrah! It&apos;s bliss!   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2497</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:13:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Americans</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>ignorance</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>knowledge</category>
		<category>LATimes</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Mr. skullhead</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


