<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with polls</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/polls</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'polls' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:02:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:02:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Jesus who?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80588/Jesus%2Dwho</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/192583/page/1&quot;&gt;The End of Christian America.&lt;/a&gt;
The percentage of self-identified Christians has fallen 10 points in the past two decades. How that statistic explains who we are now&#8212;and what, as a nation, we are about to become.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80588</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:02:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>change</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>christians</category>
		<category>god</category>
		<category>jesus</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Blatcher</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Do you like this post? a)Yes b)Of course c)How could I not? d)Maybe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76350/Do%2Dyou%2Dlike%2Dthis%2Dpost%2DaYes%2DbOf%2Dcourse%2DcHow%2Dcould%2DI%2Dnot%2DdMaybe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/rethinking-public-opinion"&gt;Rethinking Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt; - the immense importance of public opinion polling in American politics, and the under-reported problems at the heart of the enterprise, combine to call for a serious critique of the polling industry, its assumptions, and its method  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>estimation</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>public</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Obama&apos;s Got Options, Baby.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75110/Obamas%2DGot%2DOptions%2DBaby</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=8ae9d19d-224a-4baa-9bde-64245f266ee7"&gt;Maybe America needs Barack more than Barack needs America...&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s got to be tough being Barack Obama these days. Just managing to hang onto a slim lead in the polls against a truly horrifying Republican ticket - after eight years in which a Republican administration has all but destroyed the nation.  Having to explain to people over and over again that no, he&apos;s really not a Muslim, and people still don&apos;t believe him.  Sarah Palin.  Maybe America isn&apos;t worth Barack&apos;s trouble. Maybe there&apos;s other fish in the sea, America.  Maybe you ought to think about that a little and stop being this way.  Canada has an election coming up too, and given &lt;a href=&quot;http://pm.gc.ca/eng/default.asp&quot;&gt;what they&apos;ve got to work with&lt;/a&gt;, more and more Canadians are starting to &lt;a href=&quot;http://barackobamaforpm.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;take a hard look south of the border.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75110</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:54:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>Harper</category>
		<category>Homewreckers</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Polls</category>
		<dc:creator>Naberius</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Obama: The Price of Being Black</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75067/Obama%2DThe%2DPrice%2Dof%2DBeing%2DBlack</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21771&quot;&gt;Obama: The Price of Being Black &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75067</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<dc:creator>wittgenstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Querying the noosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74797/Querying%2Dthe%2Dnoosphere</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-35417520080910&quot;&gt;According to a recent international survey&lt;/a&gt;, there remains no global consensus regarding who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.  &quot;On average, 46 percent of those surveyed said al Qaeda was responsible, 15 percent said the U.S. government, 7 percent said Israel and 7 percent said some other perpetrator... The U.S. government was to blame, according to 23 percent of Germans and 15 percent of Italians.&quot;  The poll was collected by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldpublicopinion.org&quot;&gt;World Public Opinion&lt;/a&gt;, a neat website filled with various polls about interesting topics.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74797</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>germantruthers</category>
		<category>globalopinion</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<dc:creator>Baby_Balrog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics...and Voter Polls</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74703/Lies%2DDamn%2DLies%2DStatisticsand%2DVoter%2DPolls</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/09/05/02"&gt;Margins of Error&lt;/a&gt; We can&apos;t seem to let the future alone.  Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2189135/pagenum/all/&quot;&gt;though we often get predictions about it so wrong&lt;/a&gt;.  Because, as Niels Bohr once said, &quot;Prediction is very difficult.  Especially if it is about the future.&quot;  What are the origins of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~tonya/309m/class/paper4/bowser/opinpoll.htm&quot;&gt;political polling&lt;/a&gt; (beware of awful interface design)?  And how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/09/05/03&quot;&gt;is political polling evolving&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74703</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:40:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>margins</category>
		<category>politicalpolls</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<dc:creator>jeanmari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What Muslims Really Think</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73638/What%2DMuslims%2DReally%2DThink</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104629/Who-Muslims.aspx&quot;&gt;Who are Muslims?&lt;/a&gt; Gallup has conducted a poll &quot;in 40 predominantly Muslim nations and among significant Muslim populations in the West. It is the first set of unified and scientifically representative views from 1.3 billion Muslims globally.&quot; They&apos;ll be parsing and interpreting this data for years, but for the time being, they&apos;ve offered some of their key results &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/consulting/worldpoll/26410/gallup-center-muslim-studies.aspx&quot;&gt;online&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/press/104209/Who-Speaks-Islam-What-Billion-Muslims-Really-Think.aspx&quot;&gt;in print&lt;/a&gt;. See also, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.muslimwestfacts.com/MWF/26650/default.aspx&quot;&gt;Muslim-West Facts Initiative&lt;/a&gt;. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://interfaithradio.org/node/559&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;) Some excerpts:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104731/Muslims-Want-Democracy-Theocracy.aspx&quot;&gt;Do Muslims Want Democracy and Theocracy?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/104941/What-Makes-Radical.aspx&quot;&gt;What Makes a Radical?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/105214/What-Muslim-Women-Want.aspx&quot;&gt;What Do Muslim Women Want?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gallup.com/poll/105700/Islam-West-Clash-Coexistence.aspx&quot;&gt;Islam and the West: Clash or Coexistence?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Initial results were published in 2006 in Foreign Policy: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://media.gallup.com/WorldPoll/PDF/MWSRRadical022207.pdf&quot;&gt;What Makes a Muslim Radical?&lt;/a&gt;&quot; in pdf. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73638</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:12:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beliefs</category>
		<category>data</category>
		<category>facts</category>
		<category>gallup</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>opinions</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polling</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The American way</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72103/The%2DAmerican%2Dway</link>
		<description> State by state electoral college &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/&quot;&gt;predictions&lt;/a&gt; for the main 2008 presidential candidates, based on polling data and updated daily. Special thanks to anotherpanacea and EarBucket, respectively, for posting those sites on metatalk recently. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72103</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:37:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2008campaign</category>
		<category>2008election</category>
		<category>Clinton</category>
		<category>electionanalysis</category>
		<category>electoralcollege</category>
		<category>McCain</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>presidentialrace</category>
		<dc:creator>Brian B.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>95% of gaijin demand 70% more pie charts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68491/95%2Dof%2Dgaijin%2Ddemand%2D70%2Dmore%2Dpie%2Dcharts</link>
		<description> Election poll fatigue? Diversify your daily dose of stats with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whatjapanthinks.com&quot;&gt;What Japan Thinks&lt;/a&gt;. Check out Japan&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatjapanthinks.com/2006/08/14/japans-top-thirty-emoticons/&quot;&gt;favorite emoticons&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatjapanthinks.com/2007/06/06/drinking-vinegar-in-japan/&quot;&gt;thoughts on drinking vinegar&lt;/a&gt;, and of course &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatjapanthinks.com/2007/02/22/japanese-cats-at-their-cutest/&quot;&gt;awwcats&lt;/a&gt;. And if you still &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; need something about the primaries, &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatjapanthinks.com/2007/11/04/the-worlds-30-best-looking-politicians-in-japanese-eyes/&quot;&gt;Hillary Clinton is the 4th-best-looking world politician&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68491</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:11:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>japan</category>
		<category>piecharts</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>whatjapanthinks</category>
		<dc:creator>soma lkzx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Not as subtle and intricate as AskMefi.  But way faster.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66863/Not%2Das%2Dsubtle%2Dand%2Dintricate%2Das%2DAskMefi%2DBut%2Dway%2Dfaster</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ask500people.com/"&gt;Ask 500 (or 100) people:&lt;/a&gt; Random participants answer each other&apos;s polls on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/do-you-think-prayer-should-be-put-back-in-schools&quot;&gt;prayer in school&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/according-to-the-bible-is-homosexuality-a-sin&quot;&gt;the bible&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/which-philospher-do-you-agree-with-most&quot;&gt;philosophers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/should-america-withdraw-from-iraq&quot;&gt;iraq&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/how-often-to-you-go-out-to-see-your-friends&quot;&gt;social habits&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/is-there-such-thing-as-true-love&quot;&gt;love&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/would-you-prefer-to-have-a-traditional-wedding-or-a-more-unique-one&quot;&gt;marriage&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/do-you-feel-as-if-you-have-too-many-material-possessions-or-too-few&quot;&gt;materialism&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/questions/do-you-think-americans-take-freedom-of-speech-too-far&quot;&gt;freedom of speech&lt;/a&gt;, or whatever topic of interest someone wants to open up for a very momentary spotlight, and reasonably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask500people.com/premium.html&quot;&gt;accurate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.ask500people.com/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions&quot;&gt;data&lt;/a&gt;. I just found the questions people choose to ask kind of interesting - often you learn as much from the way they frame their issue and the choices they offer as from the numbers that come back.  
Not sure if the current audience is skewed, but be warned results are occasionally depressing :) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66863</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:17:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>information</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>mdn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Poo Bum Dicky Wee Wee!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64083/Poo%2DBum%2DDicky%2DWee%2DWee</link>
		<description> People vandalising Wikipedia is hardly a new thing but now even the office of the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, is getting into the act. Website &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/&quot;&gt;Wiki-Scanner&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/63806&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) has traced several edits to Wikipedia articles by the Prime Ministers staff, according to Australian newspaper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22299459-952,00.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Courier Mail&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. And they aren&apos;t confined solely to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_howard&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry on the PM &lt;/a&gt;himself; there was even an act of vandalism on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bubishi&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=77315197&quot;&gt;a martial-arts related entry&lt;/a&gt;, in which one of Howard&apos;s ministerial staffers wrote, &#8220;Poo bum dicky wee wee&#8221; on the page. Not good news on the eve of a federal election that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/no-gain-for-pm-from-strip-club-furore/2007/08/23/1187462438809.html&quot;&gt;PM is largely expected to lose&lt;/a&gt;. Meanwhile, &apos;new media&apos; is being put to good use at Opposition leader Kevin Rudd&apos;s website, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kevin07.com.au&quot;&gt;Kevin07&lt;/a&gt;, where a recent blog entry compiles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kevin07.com.au/myblog/thebestofyoutube-2.html&quot;&gt;Youtube&apos;s &apos;best&apos; political videos.&lt;/a&gt; Hours of fun for the whole family!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64083</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:51:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>australianpolitics</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>johnhoward</category>
		<category>kevin07</category>
		<category>kevinrudd</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>Effigy2000</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reagan tops Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56167/Reagan%2Dtops%2DLincoln</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/influentials/coverpoll.mhtml"&gt;A poll that the GOP is actually winning&lt;/a&gt; Reagan?! What is happening to The Atlantic?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56167</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 05:56:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>magazines</category>
		<category>political</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>Reagan</category>
		<dc:creator>papoon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Introducing Pollster.com</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54469/Introducing%2DPollstercom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pollster.com/introducing_pollstercom.php"&gt;Introducing Pollster.com.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalarithmetik.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;PoliticalArithmetik&lt;/a&gt; and the Mystery Pollster combine to form &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/&quot;&gt;Pollster.com&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/about/&quot;&gt;about&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/faq/&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pollster.com/pollstercom/a_guide_to_our_charts_and_data.php&quot;&gt;guide to charts and data&lt;/a&gt;). The site features nifty charts and graphs of state-by-state senatorial and gubernatorial races. &lt;small&gt;[more inside; &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2006/09/polling_sites_f.html&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54469</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>mysterypollster</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>pollster</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Handicapping the midterms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52897/Handicapping%2Dthe%2Dmidterms</link>
		<description> As in the 2004 elections, several useful sites have sprung up to keep track of the 2006 midterms for House, Senate and state gubernatorial races.  Some have a political point of view, others don&apos;t, but they don&apos;t differ significantly on the outcome at this point.  One of the veterans in this game is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/&quot;&gt;ElectionProjection.com&lt;/a&gt;, which was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html&quot;&gt;pretty close to actual results&lt;/a&gt; in &apos;04.  (A creation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electionprojection.com/bloggingcaesar.html&quot;&gt;&quot;the Blogging Caesar&quot;)&lt;/a&gt;.  From the right, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myelectionanalysis.com/&quot;&gt;MyElectionAnalysis.com&lt;/a&gt;, while &lt;a href=&quot;http://electionpredictions.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;ElectionPredictions&lt;/a&gt; seems to come from a neutral corner.  All of these track statewide polls as they are published; they may differ in how they weight results.  For a more subjective approach, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/&quot;&gt;Larry Sabato&apos;s Crystal Ball&lt;/a&gt; or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cookpolitical.com/&quot;&gt;Cook Political Report&lt;/a&gt;.   Overall, the consensus seems to be that the GOP will hold both houses, but with slimmer margins, and lose on the gubernatorial front.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52897</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>governor</category>
		<category>house</category>
		<category>midterms</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>prediction</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<dc:creator>beagle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Win is irreversible, says ruling party&apos;s candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52738/Win%2Dis%2Dirreversible%2Dsays%2Druling%2Dpartys%2Dcandidate</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1811951,00.html"&gt;Mexico&apos;s election: now being recounted,&lt;/a&gt; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gregpalast.com/stealing-it-in-front-of-your-eyes#more-1440&quot;&gt;some are saying it was stolen with our help&lt;/a&gt;. Many countries in Latin and South America have been moving to the left lately, &lt;i&gt;following in the footsteps of Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Bolivia and Chile.&lt;/i&gt; Argentina actually caught us messing with things during their election, too. Exit polls in Mexico (as in Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004) showed a lead for the more leftist (relatively) candidate, and for those who scoff at using exit polls as evidence--in 2004, &lt;i&gt;US Republican Senator Richard Lugar, in Kiev, cited the divergence of exit polls and official polls as solid evidence of &#8220;blatant fraud&#8221; in the vote count in Ukraine. As a result, the Bush Administration refused to recognize the Ukraine government&#8217;s official vote tally.&lt;/i&gt; So, honest election, or what?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52738</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>meddling</category>
		<category>Mexico</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>So at least he&apos;s doing better than Mondale did...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51717/So%2Dat%2Dleast%2Dhes%2Ddoing%2Dbetter%2Dthan%2DMondale%2Ddid</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mydd.com/story/2006/5/15/202917/008"&gt;updated red state/blue state&lt;/a&gt; map of America with recent poll results in place. Bush still (alarmingly) holding down Utah, Idaho &amp;amp; Wyoming, otherwise, not so great...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51717</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:32:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bluestate</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>redstate</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This is &quot;Anyone but Bush&quot; Country!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51641/This%2Dis%2DAnyone%2Dbut%2DBush%2DCountry</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/50State2006/50StatePres060515State.htm"&gt;Bush out of favor in 47 out of 50 states.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/50StateTracking.html&quot;&gt;SurveyUSA 50-state-poll&lt;/a&gt; shows some interesting details on Bush&apos;s approval rating, which has fallen to just 35% in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=8b5f9e94-3ec0-4f8a-8ba3-e107b96036a8&quot;&gt;North&lt;/a&gt; (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=1252cfb3-ca2f-4585-b810-0f378cfed8cd&quot;&gt;South&lt;/a&gt;) Carolina,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=b5858c5f-1f05-4220-97f6-21e0af7543e8&quot;&gt;29% in Missouri&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=87c66d02-973f-4aed-bb0c-75de38f33048&quot;&gt;42% in Texas&lt;/a&gt;. He remains popular in only three states: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=51727c17-e296-4c14-b552-2f3d5a1b7884&quot;&gt;Idaho&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=1b676a3e-5aab-4482-968d-2e614ddc18a5&quot;&gt;Utah&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=e001327f-0a96-4e02-863b-087cfcc59e3c&quot;&gt;Wyoming&lt;/a&gt;. Could the Democrats have a shot even in Utah in the not-too-distant future? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3826269&quot;&gt;A lot of Utahns think so&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51641</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 09:40:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>approval</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>Idaho</category>
		<category>poll</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<category>Utah</category>
		<category>Wyoming</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nobody Loves You When You&apos;re Godless And Out</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50272/Nobody%2DLoves%2DYou%2DWhen%2DYoure%2DGodless%2DAnd%2DOut</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ur.umn.edu/FMPro?-db=releases&amp;amp;-lay=web&amp;amp;-format=umnnewsreleases/releasesdetail.html&amp;amp;ID=2816&amp;amp;-Find"&gt;A recent poll ranks atheists as America&apos;s most distrusted minority.&lt;/a&gt; Despite some inroads into American&apos;s acceptance of religious diversity, distrust of the godless appears to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=726&quot;&gt;held steady.&lt;/a&gt;  Should atheists &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/03/should-atheists-evangelize.html&quot;&gt;evangelize,&lt;/a&gt; or perhaps follow in the footsteps of &lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060222074809990044&quot;&gt;certain&lt;/a&gt; Christian fundamentalists and 
seek an &lt;a href=&quot;http://gillebell.bumr.net/58&quot;&gt;Atheist Homeland&lt;/a&gt;?  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/quotes/scarstartframe.htm&quot;&gt;sticks and stones&lt;/a&gt; seem endless, after all.  
&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/03/its_good_to_know_how_much_were.php#trackback&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50272</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atheisim</category>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>fundamentalists</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<dc:creator>maryh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s the Chronic - what? - Polls of Zobgy!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50144/Its%2Dthe%2DChronic%2Dwhat%2DPolls%2Dof%2DZobgy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6838"&gt;Nearly Half of Americans want to let states legally regulate and tax marijuana the way they do liquor and gambling.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zogby.com/&quot;&gt;Zogby International&lt;/a&gt; will pimp there services to just about anyone these days, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://norml.org/&quot;&gt;NORML&lt;/a&gt; for a poll on American&apos;s attitudes towards pot. According to the poll 65% of 18-29 year olds and 50% of 50-64 year-olds are cool with weed being legal and controlled like booze. The former slackers of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X&quot;&gt;Generation X&lt;/a&gt;, 30-49 year-olds, oppose it by 58% and the geezers over 65 oppose it by only 52%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

The pool shows some interesting generational attitudes. Is the 30-49 age group still following Nancy Reagan&apos;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_say_no&quot;&gt;Just Say No&lt;/a&gt;&quot; mantra or is this the attitude of parents worried about their kids? I thought these folks were supposed to be the slacker generation, and now they&apos;re the strongest opponents to legalization.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50144</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alice</category>
		<category>B.</category>
		<category>Bambalacha</category>
		<category>Blunt</category>
		<category>Brick</category>
		<category>Buda</category>
		<category>Cheeba</category>
		<category>Dawamesk</category>
		<category>Doobie</category>
		<category>Dusting</category>
		<category>Fatty</category>
		<category>Generation</category>
		<category>Grass</category>
		<category>Hemp</category>
		<category>Herb</category>
		<category>hit</category>
		<category>Jane</category>
		<category>Joint</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>legalization</category>
		<category>Lid</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>Mary</category>
		<category>Matchbox</category>
		<category>NORML</category>
		<category>Phillies</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>Ragweed</category>
		<category>Reefer</category>
		<category>Roach</category>
		<category>shlook</category>
		<category>sticks</category>
		<category>Thai</category>
		<category>Toklas</category>
		<category>Wacky</category>
		<category>weed</category>
		<category>Woolah</category>
		<category>zogby</category>
		<dc:creator>DragonBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Happiness poll results are in</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50117/Happiness%2Dpoll%2Dresults%2Dare%2Din</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://pewresearch.org/social/pack.php?PackID=1"&gt;The happiness poll results are in&lt;/a&gt; and to no one&apos;s surprise, rich people are happier than poor people. Also, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20060316/sc_space/republicanshappierthandemocrats&quot;&gt;Republicans are happier than Democrats&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50117</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:21:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>happiness</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>SCIENCE</category>
		<dc:creator>mr_crash_davis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You&apos;ve lost the troops, sir.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49598/Youve%2Dlost%2Dthe%2Dtroops%2Dsir</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1075"&gt;US Troop poll results in:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and nearly one in four say the troops should leave immediately&lt;/em&gt;.  In other news, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4755770.stm&quot;&gt;58% of Americans think the troops should stay&lt;/a&gt;.  Back to the troops: &lt;em&gt;85% said the U.S. mission is mainly &#8220;to retaliate for Saddam&#8217;s role in the 9-11 attacks,&#8221; 77% said they also believe the main or a major reason for the war was &#8220;to stop Saddam from protecting al Qaeda in Iraq.&#8221;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49598</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Greatest Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42517/Greatest%2DAmericans</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050418/dcm023.html?.v=6"&gt;The 100 Greatest Americans ?&lt;/a&gt; This Sunday night at 8:00, the Discovery Channel will begin a seven hour series that starts with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2005/05/the_100_greates.html&quot;&gt;top 100 Americans nominated by an on-line poll&lt;/a&gt; and culminates in real-time election- style voting, as America selects one person to be named the &quot;Greatest American.&quot;   Dr. Phil vs. Oprah, Barbara Bush vs. Laura Bush, and Jacko vs. Madonna.  Can you feel the excitement?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42517</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Americans</category>
		<category>celebrities</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<dc:creator>Secret Life of Gravy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>But what about Clerks, Mallrats???</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42333/But%2Dwhat%2Dabout%2DClerks%2DMallrats</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/index.html"&gt;Time Mag&apos;s 100 All Time Best Flicks&lt;/a&gt; Compiled by their OWN critics, of course. Hence no Kevin Smith masterpieces mentioned. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/2005/100movies/the_complete_list.html&quot;&gt;List &lt;/a&gt; also fails to mention some of the most popular movies of all time. It can&apos;t be right if it doesn&apos;t include the Wizard of Oz.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42333</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 16:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>critics</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<dc:creator>PrincessLara</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Poll: Public Would Significantly Alter Administration&apos;s Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40281/New%2DPoll%2DPublic%2DWould%2DSignificantly%2DAlter%2DAdministrations%2DBudget</link>
		<description> A new poll finds that the American public would significantly alter the Bush administration&#8217;s recently proposed federal budget. Presented a breakdown of the major areas of the proposed discretionary budget and given the opportunity to redistribute it, respondents made major changes. The most dramatic changes were deep cuts in defense spending, a significant reallocation toward deficit reduction, and increases in spending on education, job training, reducing reliance on oil, and veterans. These changes were favored by both Republicans and Democrats, though the changes were generally greater for Democrats.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/html/more_03_07_05.html#1&quot; title=&quot;The American public as a whole takes a fairly coherent position. They favor redirecting a portion of defense spending to deficit reduction and social spending and look for savings by cutting spending on large-scale Cold War style capabilities--not unlike Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld&#8212;and sizing capabilities on the assumption that the US will be acting together with allies, not on its own.&quot;&gt;What America Gets  Right&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/Report03_07_05.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;) via &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gadflyer.com/flytrap/index.php?Week=200510#1584&quot;&gt;The Gadflyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40281</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>opinionpolls</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USbudget</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq-raq-on!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39000/Iraqraqon</link>
		<description> As Iraqis &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=660712&quot;&gt;go&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comw.org/pda/0501br17.html&quot;&gt;polls&lt;/a&gt; on Jan. 30, 
it will be a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6836134/&quot;&gt;daunting&lt;/a&gt; 
first &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&amp;categ_id=5&amp;article_id=12079&quot;&gt;exercise&lt;/a&gt; in democracy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39000</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:13:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>exiles</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>us-withrawal</category>
		<dc:creator>furtive</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


