<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pornography and censorship</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pornography+censorship</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pornography' and 'censorship' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Pornsec Doubleplusungood!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86803/Pornsec%2DDoubleplusungood</link>
		<description> When the Jessamine* County Public Library acquired a copy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/contribute/search.mefi?site=mefi&amp;q=alan+moore&quot;&gt;Alan Moore&lt;/a&gt; and Kevin O&apos;Neill&apos;s &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_League_of_Extraordinary_Gentlemen:_Black_Dossier&quot;&gt;The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Black Dossier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, two library workers &lt;a href=&quot;http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/11/09/alan-moore-destroyer-of-librarians/&quot;&gt;conspired to keep it out of the patrons&apos; hands&lt;/a&gt;, checking it out for an entire year. After an eleven-year-old girl put a hold on the book, they removed the hold; upon discovering this, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kentucky.com/latest_news/story/1011029.html&quot;&gt;the library director fired them&lt;/a&gt;. Sharon Cook, one of the fired workers, said, &quot;People prayed over me while I was reading it because I did not want those images in my head.&quot; Here&apos;s a Flickr set of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/melymbrosia/sets/72157622764761352/&quot;&gt;some of the images in question&lt;/a&gt;, NSFW unsurprisingly, that show scenes from an imagined meeting of Fanny Hill and Lemuel Gulliver, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/contribute/search.mefi?site=mefi&amp;q=tijuana+bible&quot;&gt;Tijuana Bible&lt;/a&gt; created by the Pornsec division of the Ministry of Truth from &lt;em&gt;Nineteen Eighty-Four&lt;/em&gt;, and other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/81368/Mooregasm&quot;&gt;naughty bits&lt;/a&gt;. 

*Yes, MeFi mod/librarian eponysteria. &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/18/library-workers-fire.html&quot;&gt;(Via)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86803</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alanmoore</category>
		<category>blackdossier</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>erotica</category>
		<category>graphicnovel</category>
		<category>kevinoneill</category>
		<category>leagueofextraordinarygentlemen</category>
		<category>library</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<dc:creator>Halloween Jack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bill Henson&apos;s censored photographic exhibition.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71963/Bill%2DHensons%2Dcensored%2Dphotographic%2Dexhibition</link>
		<description> Photographs of esteemed Sydney artist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/artists/18/Bill_Henson/&quot;&gt;Bill Henson&lt;/a&gt; have been removed by police from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/news/henson-statement.html&quot;&gt;Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery&lt;/a&gt;, and the debate over art vs pornography vs pedophilia heats up in Sydney this week.

Some of the debate is quite &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/move-to-protect-children/2008/05/25/1211653837337.html&quot;&gt;measured and intelligent&lt;/a&gt; while other sides are descending to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/naked-fury-cool-it/2008/05/25/1211653823602.html&quot;&gt;unruly levels&lt;/a&gt;. Even Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23745396-2702,00.html&quot;&gt;something to say&lt;/a&gt; about the whole debacle.

Unfortunately the offending artworks have been removed from both the gallery&apos;s website and walls, so we can not judge for ourselves.  Once again we&apos;ll have to leave it up to the courts to decide. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71963</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 02:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>henson</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<dc:creator>robotot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Porn and the rest of us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45817/Porn%2Dand%2Dthe%2Drest%2Dof%2Dus</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=filmNews&amp;amp;storyID=2005-10-12T071801Z_01_ROB225980_RTRIDST_0_FILM-PORN-DC.XML"&gt;What you watch&lt;/a&gt; Tucked deep inside a massive bill designed to track sex offenders and prevent children from being victimized by sex crimes is language that could put many Hollywood movies in the same category as hardcore, X-rated films. The provision added to the Children&apos;s Safety Act of 2005 would require any film, TV show or digital image that contains a sex scene to come under the same government filing requirements that adult films must meet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45817</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:53:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>bigbrother</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<dc:creator>halekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13051/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ncsf-foundation.org/cdafacts.htm"&gt;Fighting the CDA&lt;/a&gt; : The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom is working with one of nations most interesting erotic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.barbaranitke.com/&quot;&gt;photographers&lt;/a&gt; to overturn the portion of the CDA that ties all internet obscenity to the most restrictive definition of the most restrictive community in the nation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.13051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:53:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BarbaraNitke</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CDA</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>erotica</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NCSF</category>
		<category>obscenity</category>
		<category>photographer</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>soulhuntre</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8232/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44398,00.html"&gt;John Ashcroft on web porn:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;I am concerned about obscenity and I&apos;m concerned about obscenity as it relates to our children&quot;. I&apos;m curious what those of you who are more on the conservative/libertarian side of things think about this. Are there special exemptions to the concept of free speech when it comes to this type of content? [more]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8232</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:43:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>JohnAshcroft</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


