<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with power and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/power+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'power' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:35:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:35:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Disaster Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74196/Disaster%2DCapitalism</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&quot;Like the dotcom bubble, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/10/3726/&quot;&gt;disaster bubble&lt;/a&gt; is inflating in an ad-hoc and chaotic fashion.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Journalist Naomi Klein discusses how corporations and governments are working together more closely than ever, using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.avclub.com/content/interview/naomi_klein&quot;&gt;mandate of catastrophe&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; whether&amp;#0160;natural or man-made &#8212; to further concentrate power in fewer hands, with less oversight: from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/8/15/mccommunism_naomi_klein_and_christian_parenti&quot;&gt;illegal sales of American police technology&lt;/a&gt; to China to avert hypothetical tragedies during the Beijing Olympics, to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://international.uiowa.edu/accents/08spring/price-water.asp&quot;&gt;privatization of water supplies&lt;/a&gt; in post-tsunami Sri Lanka.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74196</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:35:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>accountability</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>corporatism</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>katrina</category>
		<category>klein</category>
		<category>naomiklein</category>
		<category>olympics</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>srilanka</category>
		<category>tiananmen</category>
		<category>water</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Con vs. Con</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64517/Con%2Dvs%2DCon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/but_is_it_war/"&gt;But Is It War?&lt;/a&gt; A vigorous debate among three conservatives about the limits of post-9/11 executive power.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64517</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:00:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>authority</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>executive</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tell me the stories that will embarrass those conservative bigots that are backing a constitutional ban on our formalized relationships.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58077/Tell%2Dme%2Dthe%2Dstories%2Dthat%2Dwill%2Dembarrass%2Dthose%2Dconservative%2Dbigots%2Dthat%2Dare%2Dbacking%2Da%2Dconstitutional%2Dban%2Don%2Dour%2Dformalized%2Drelationships</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bilerico.com/2007/01/002137.php#more"&gt;The dirty underbelly&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;i&gt;I&apos;m sick and tired of these hypocritical Hoosier legislators who think that my sex life or relationship status is any of their business. Do I intrude on who they&apos;re sleeping with? I didn&apos;t, but I&apos;m going to start now. ...Consider this a call to &lt;s&gt;arms&lt;/s&gt; gossip. ...&lt;/i&gt; -- Bilerico, a GLBT blog in Indiana, fighting their proposed state Constitutional Amendment to ban marriage and all other rights for gay and lesbian couples and families.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58077</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>civil</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>outing</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>shame</category>
		<category>unions</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rule of Law?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51296/Rule%2Dof%2DLaw</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/"&gt;...Bush has been aggressive about declaring his right to ignore vast swaths of laws -- many of which he says infringe on power he believes the Constitution assigns to him alone ...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution. ...&lt;/i&gt; Long, eyeopening article laying out what laws have been ignored and why. &lt;i&gt;...Bush has cast a cloud over &apos;the whole idea that there is a rule of law,&quot; because no one can be certain of which laws Bush thinks are valid and which he thinks he can ignore.
&apos;Where you have a president who is willing to declare vast quantities of the legislation that is passed during his term unconstitutional, it implies that he also thinks a very significant amount of the other laws that were already on the books before he became president are also unconstitutional,&quot; ...&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51296</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:50:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accountability</category>
		<category>balances</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>checks</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>dictatorship</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>canary in a coalmine? better late than never?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46773/canary%2Din%2Da%2Dcoalmine%2Dbetter%2Dlate%2Dthan%2Dnever</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.forward.com/articles/6856"&gt;Anti-Defamation League speaks up against the Christianizing of America--&lt;/a&gt; They&apos;re calling for &lt;i&gt;a communal strategy for confronting the political and cultural initiatives of religious conservative groups&lt;/i&gt;, and naming the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/weyrich/041203&quot;&gt;Arlington Group,&lt;/a&gt; Focus on the Family, The American Family Association and the Family Research Council as some of those responsible for the &lt;i&gt;infrastructures throughout the country designed not just to promote traditional &#8220;Christian values,&#8221; but to actively pursue that restoration of a Christian nation.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejewishpress.com/news_article.asp?article=5677&quot;&gt;Opinions differ, of course.&lt;/a&gt;  Foxman anticipates them in his speech, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adl.org/Religious_Freedom/religion_public_square.asp&quot;&gt; Religion in America&#8217;s Public Square: Are We Crossing the Line?:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;... On one hand, there is an extreme element in the community that believes it is unsafe to confront Christianity. ...  There are also those who say that because evangelicals are friends of Israel, &#8220;don&#8217;t fight them;&#8221; &#8220;don&#8217;t make them angry;&#8221; &#8220;don&#8217;t upset them.&#8221; . ...&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46773</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Christians</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Jews</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>theocracy</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10942/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/30/wtal30.xml"&gt;Taliban leader&apos;s ex-bodyguard says&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;&quot;We laughed when we heard the Americans asking Mullah Omar to hand over Osama bin Laden,&quot; he said. &quot;The Americans are crazy. It is Osama bin Laden who can hand over Mullah Omar - not the other way round.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  Take a look at this insider&apos;s personal account of the Taliban that some are so eager to apologize for in the name of cultural relativism.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10942</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:17:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>mullahomar</category>
		<category>osamabinladen</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>taliban</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


