<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with presidentialcampaigns</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/presidentialcampaigns</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'presidentialcampaigns' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:54:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:54:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Exiting Deanspace</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31155/Exiting%2DDeanspace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/02/03/exiting_deanspace.php"&gt;Exiting Deanspace:&lt;/a&gt; As one who has watched with growing nausea as the Howard Dean campaign has smacked up against primary reality and disintegrated, this lengthy article offers some useful truths. While the post mortem is far from over, this cogent analysis by Clay Shirky from &quot;Many 2 Many&quot; points out how so many of us could have been so blinded by the process . . . while still having reason for hope.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31155</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:54:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>ClayShirky</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>HowardDean</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>presidentialcampaigns</category>
		<dc:creator>mooncrow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Non-alcoholic Brewster&apos;s Millions</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26671/Nonalcoholic%2DBrewsters%2DMillions</link>
		<description> Even with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moveon.org/&quot;&gt;frequently-discussed endorsements&lt;/a&gt;, the Democrats have a lot to worry about financially: staffers for George W. Bush&apos;s re-election campaign are making a &quot;conservative estimate&quot; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/06/22/MN271984.DTL&quot;&gt;Bush will spend an average of &lt;b&gt;$426,640&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;every single day&lt;/i&gt; from now until November 2004 on his re-election campaign.  Bush will be promoting his visions of (among other things) fiscal conservatism by spending more money each day for the next 16 months than over 99% of the American population earns annually.  Campaign spokesman Montgomery Brewster could not be reached for comment.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26671</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:00:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignspending</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>fiscalconservatism</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>montgomerybrewster</category>
		<category>moveon</category>
		<category>presidentialcampaigns</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


