<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with privacy and canada</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/privacy+canada</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'privacy' and 'canada' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:50:18 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:50:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ahoy, eh!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/102740/Ahoy%2Deh</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pirateparty.ca/about&quot;&gt;Canadian Pirate Party&lt;/a&gt; is official, registered, and running 10-12 candidates in the current federal election. The recent debate over usage-based billing convinced at least &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/04/14/fringe-profile-pirate-party-champions-internet-issues/&quot;&gt;one of its candidates&lt;/a&gt; of its potential appeal to voters. They are unabashedly an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/webjam.cfm?content=180254&quot;&gt;issue-based party&lt;/a&gt;, whose platform deals with intellectual property, privacy, net neutrality, and government access/openness. Previously: There is also an official Pirate Party in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/101360/Talker-Vote-Like-A-Pirate&quot;&gt;Massachusetts&lt;/a&gt;, and in countries such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/84073/Ship-ahoy-Captain&quot;&gt;Britain, Germany, and Sweden&lt;/a&gt;. Canada has been described as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/71444/Canada-the-final-frontier-of-filesharing&quot;&gt;&quot;today&apos;s frontier upon which the war of file-sharing legality is waged.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.102740</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:50:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>netneutrality</category>
		<category>opengovernment</category>
		<category>pirateparty</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>kevinsp8</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Canada Reigns In Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84540/Canada%2DReigns%2DIn%2DFacebook</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/facebook-agrees-to-privacy-changes/article1266576/#video&quot; title=&quot;Facebook agrees to privacy changes - The Globe and Mail&quot;&gt;Facebook agrees to privacy changes&lt;/a&gt; [Flash video | &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/facebook-agrees-to-privacy-changes/article1266576/&quot; title=&quot;Facebook agrees to privacy changes - The Globe and Mail&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;]. After an investigation by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.priv.gc.ca/index_e.cfm&quot; title=&quot;Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada&quot;&gt;Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada&lt;/a&gt;, which found that Facebook gave &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/facebook-moves-to-improve-privacy-and-transparency/?ref=technology&quot; title=&quot;Facebook Moves to Improve Privacy and Transparency - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com&quot;&gt;&quot;confusing or incomplete&quot; privacy information to subscribers and gave developers &quot;virtually unrestricted access to Facebook users&#8217; personal information&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, Facebook  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2009/nr-c_090827_e.cfm&quot; title=&quot;News Release: Facebook agrees to address Privacy Commissioner&#8217;s concerns - August 27, 2009&quot;&gt;has agreed to address the Privacy Commissioner&#8217;s concerns&lt;/a&gt;.

&#8220;These changes mean that the privacy of 200 million Facebook users in Canada and around the world will be far better protected.&#8221; - Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart.

&quot;The notion that some teenager, working in a basement halfway around the globe, that could have access to all of this personal information was unsettling, to say the least.&quot; - Elizabeth Denholm, Deputy Privacy Commissioner. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84540</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>global</category>
		<category>network</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>rules</category>
		<category>social</category>
		<dc:creator>shoesfullofdust</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Canada getting all up in your Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83774/Canada%2Dgetting%2Dall%2Dup%2Din%2Dyour%2DFacebook</link>
		<description> In &lt;a href=&apos;http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/07/17/1346209/Facebook-Violates-Canadian-Privacy-Law&apos;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; to a complaint by &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080531/facebook_complaint_080531/20080531?hub=TopStories&apos;&gt;law students&lt;/a&gt; at the University of Ottawa in &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2008/05/30/facebook-privacy.html&apos;&gt;May of 2008&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2009/nr-c_090716_e.cfm&apos;&gt;Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.priv.gc.ca/cf-dc/2009/2009_008_0716_e.cfm&apos;&gt;found&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.facebook.com/policy.php&apos;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/667700&apos;&gt;operating contrary&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.priv.gc.ca/legislation/02_06_01_e.cfm&apos;&gt;Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act&lt;/a&gt;. In other words, Facebook is &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/07/16/facebook-privacy-commissioner.html&apos;&gt;breaching Canadian privacy law&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/02/17/facebook-privacy.html&apos;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; has pledged to work with the Canadian government on this issue, and has &lt;a href=&apos;http://communities.canada.com/vancouversun/blogs/techsense/archive/2009/07/16/facebook-breaking-canada-s-privacy-laws-has-30-days-to-fix.aspx&apos;&gt;30 days to comply&lt;/a&gt;; if the Commissioner &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=1796706&apos;&gt;remains unsatisfied&lt;/a&gt; with their progress, they may take the case to Federal Court to force compliance.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83774</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 09:47:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>stinkycheese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Offal off-limits?  Officially, no.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80726/Offal%2Dofflimits%2DOfficially%2Dno</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2009/2009scc17/2009scc17.html&quot;&gt;The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled&lt;/a&gt; that a search of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/04/09/supreme-court-garbage-privacy.html&quot;&gt;your trash&lt;/a&gt; doesn&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090409.wgarbage0409/BNStory/National/home&quot;&gt;violate your privacy&lt;/a&gt;.  This decision is in line &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_684/&quot;&gt;with that of the United States&lt;/a&gt;. For those interested in the issues surrounding privacy in Canada, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privcom.gc.ca/aboutUs/index_e.asp&quot;&gt;Office of the Privacy Commissioner&lt;/a&gt; is an invaluable resource. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/69009/Quis-custodiet-ipsos-custodes&quot;&gt;(prev)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80726</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>ecstasy</category>
		<category>garbage</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<dc:creator>Lemurrhea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69009/Quis%2Dcustodiet%2Dipsos%2Dcustodes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/"&gt;The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has a blog.&lt;/a&gt; This is an &quot;official&quot; blog covering issues of privacy issues and legislation in Canada.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69009</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>blue_beetle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You and I were/weren&apos;t meant to fly....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65508/You%2Dand%2DI%2Dwerewerent%2Dmeant%2Dto%2Dfly</link>
		<description> The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1186668114504.shtm&quot;&gt;proposing new rules&lt;/a&gt; regarding passenger pre-screening both domestically and internationally.  Interestingly, this includes flights that overfly the continental US without ever touching the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/10/11/uscanada-flights.html&quot;&gt;ground.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Overflying the Continental United States. This proposed rule 
defines ``overflying the continental United States&apos; as departing from 
an airport or location outside the United States, and transiting the 
airspace of the continental United States en route to another airport 
or location outside the United States...In this proposed rule, flights ``overflying the continental United 
States&apos; are a category of ``covered flights&apos; for which TSA would 
conduct passenger watch list matching in order to protect the airspace 
over the continental United States and prevent individuals on a watch 
list from taking control of an aircraft...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=211925190551+1+0+0&amp;WAISaction=retrieve&quot;&gt;From the proposed rule.&lt;/a&gt;

The rule does not cover flights that originate in one country, overfly the US, and land again in the originating country.  For example, a flight between Toronto and Vancouver would be exempt.

Since Transport Canada has already implemented a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tc.gc.ca/vigilance/sep/passenger_protect/menu.htm&quot;&gt;no-fly list,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atac.ca/index.html&quot;&gt;ATAC&lt;/a&gt; is questioning the purpose of this.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2007/10/12/airtravel-us.html&quot;&gt;Others&lt;/a&gt; wonder about different effects on the travel habits of Canadians and Americans. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65508</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airspace</category>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>cuba</category>
		<category>flight</category>
		<category>homeland</category>
		<category>mexico</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>secure</category>
		<category>secureflight</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>soverignty</category>
		<category>travel</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>never used baby shoes</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Canadian border guards gone wild</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65222/Canadian%2Dborder%2Dguards%2Dgone%2Dwild</link>
		<description> Facebook and MySpace posts embarrass &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2007/10/01/bc-borderguards.html&quot;&gt;Canadian border guards&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/bc/news/071001-borderguards.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;. Another example of Jan Wong&apos;s advice in &lt;a href=&quot;http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0505b&amp;L=mmc&amp;P=643&quot;&gt;15 minutes of shame&lt;/a&gt;, about a 2005 incident at a Toronto private school: &lt;em&gt;Don&apos;t write anything you wouldn&apos;t want someone to forward to [the national newspaper]&lt;/em&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65222</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>russilwvong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Swingers Clubs ruled legal in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47794/Swingers%2DClubs%2Druled%2Dlegal%2Din%2DCanada</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=1135205412524&amp;amp;call_pageid=968332188492&amp;amp;col=968793972154"&gt;Newsfilter: Sex Clubs OK in Canada&lt;/a&gt; ruled the Supreme Court yesterday in a 7-2 decision that drastically alters the definition of indecency in this country. What will be the results of this far-reaching change? Will &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20051222/SWINGERS22/TPNational/Canada&apos;&gt;gay bathhouses and marijuana growing&lt;/a&gt; be affected? Will there be &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=cfafe135-d41e-4d29-88a9-ae727ded02e6&amp;k=55301&apos;&gt;anti-social behaviour?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;&quot;Now harm, rather than community standards, is the key yardstick that will be used to measure the point at which constitutional freedoms can be limited&quot;.&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47794</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:20:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>indecency</category>
		<category>lifestyle</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>swingers</category>
		<category>swingersclubs</category>
		<dc:creator>stinkycheese</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot; You cannot name a Canadian prime minister who has done as many significant things as I did, because there are none&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45067/You%2Dcannot%2Dname%2Da%2DCanadian%2Dprime%2Dminister%2Dwho%2Dhas%2Ddone%2Das%2Dmany%2Dsignificant%2Dthings%2Das%2DI%2Ddid%2Dbecause%2Dthere%2Dare%2Dnone</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050912.wxmacgregor12/BNStory/National/?pageRequested=1"&gt;As author Peter C. Newman writes in an explosive new book: &quot;He bugs us still.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; : &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randomhouse.ca/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780679313519&quot;&gt;The Secret Mulroney Tapes: Unguarded Confessions of a Prime Minister&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; is due for release this fall, and it&apos;s safe to say that it will likely be the most intimate and personal behind the scenes look at what a Canadian Prime Minister is actually thinking. That&apos;s because it&apos;s based on alleged secret tapings of private conversations between &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Mulroney&quot;&gt;Brian Mulroney&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Newman&quot;&gt;Peter Newman&lt;/a&gt;, the man enlisted to write Mulroney&apos;s biography. Oh, and it&apos;s really juicy (for Canadian politics junkies at least). On Trudeau:&quot;&lt;em&gt;He didn&apos;t want anybody to succeed where he had failed. Trudeau&apos;s contribution was not to build Canada but to destroy it, and I had to come in and save it. Three times I&apos;ve achieved unanimity. In 16 years, he couldn&apos;t do it once, the &apos;great statesman.&lt;/em&gt;&apos;&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45067</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:31:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>canada</category>
		<category>mulroney</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>primeminister</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<dc:creator>loquax</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Property values to increase!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36695/Property%2Dvalues%2Dto%2Dincrease</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2004/11/02/scoc_clark_masturbation041102.html"&gt;Touching yourself at home&lt;/a&gt; with the blinds open hot Canadian debate topic!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36695</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 19:37:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>masturbation</category>
		<category>monkeyspanking</category>
		<category>peeping</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>voyeurism</category>
		<dc:creator>shepd</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


