Related tags:
security + (59)
surveillance + (57)
internet + (47)
Google + (42)
facebook + (40)
brokenlink + (39)
law + (37)
technology + (26)
nsa + (24)
government + (23)
BigBrother + (19)
advertising + (17)
aclu + (15)
civilliberties + (15)
datamining + (14)
rights + (14)
police + (13)
politics + (13)
tracking + (13)
wiretapping + (13)
anonymity + (12)
FBI + (12)
email + (12)
search + (12)
Transparency + (12)
computers + (11)
crime + (11)
Terrorism + (11)
uk + (11)
wiretap + (11)
canada + (10)
data + (10)
spying + (10)
EFF + (9)
information + (9)
Microsoft + (9)
nytimes + (9)
wired + (9)
hacking + (8)
culture + (8)
supremecourt + (8)
USA + (8)
cctv + (7)
ATT + (7)
Eavesdropping + (7)
copyright + (7)
Constitution + (7)
fourthamendment + (7)
encryption + (7)
identity + (7)
newsfilter + (7)
online + (7)
video + (7)
hackers + (6)
dhs + (6)
cellphone + (6)
anonymous + (6)
amazon + (6)
patriotact + (6)
RFID + (6)


Users that often use this tag:
homunculus (20)
mathowie (12)
zarq (11)
jeffburdges (9)
baylink (6)
Postroad (6)
amberglow (6)
digaman (5)
goodnewsfortheinsane (4)
rzklkng (4)
crunchland (4)
Irontom (4)
tranquileye (4)
Steven Den Beste (4)
the man of twists ... (4)
fooljay (3)
aflakete (3)
ed (3)
rushmc (3)
mediareport (3)
dejah420 (3)
Toekneesan (2)
Smedleyman (2)
stinkycheese (2)
chavenet (2)
Sebmojo (2)
Joe Beese (2)
antonymous (2)
East Manitoba Regi... (2)
cashman (2)
Foci for Analysis (2)
Horace Rumpole (2)
reenum (2)
Law Talkin' Guy (2)
jaduncan (2)
Blazecock Pileon (2)
I Love Tacos (2)
Artw (2)
FeldBum (2)
knave (2)
availablelight (2)
ThePinkSuperhero (2)
chunking express (2)
squirrel (2)
blue_beetle (2)
Tryptophan-5ht (2)
jonson (2)
sheauga (2)
swift (2)
y2karl (2)
magullo (2)
Espoo2 (2)
machaus (2)
jpoulos (2)
jhiggy (2)
willnot (2)
skallas (2)
silusGROK (2)
thescoop (2)
thirteen (2)

Does privacy have a place in society anymore? Or is it incompatible with a crowded and technologically-advanced world? If we must submit to constant surveillance, who should we trust to watch?
posted by rushmc on May 23, 2002 - 21 comments

WE ARE WATCHING YOU. "The FBI added that its research is 'always mindful of constitutional, privacy and commercial equities,' and that its use of new technology can be challenged in court and in Congress." No really, go ahead, try and stop us if you don't like it. That's your (snicker, snicker) right.
posted by rushmc on Nov 24, 2001 - 12 comments

ALL YOUR EMAIL ARE BELONG TO US! How serious is this threat? What precautions do you routinely take? What precautions do you think you *should* be taking? What viable options do we have today, for those of us who aren't computer programmers by profession? And how secure are they, anyway?
posted by rushmc on May 30, 2001 - 12 comments