<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with programming and microsoft</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/programming+microsoft</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'programming' and 'microsoft' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:57:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:57:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Top Billing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43790/Top%2DBilling</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.milkandcookies.com/article/2938/"&gt;Inventor of CTRL-ALT-DEL ridicules Bill Gates.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;&apos;I may have invented CTRL-ALT-DEL, but Bill Gates made it famous&quot;. Video clip of the episode, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2005/07/27/ctrl-alt-del-inventor-mocks-bill-gates/&quot;&gt;via TUAW&lt;/a&gt;, who say &quot;The funniest part is the expression, or lack thereof, on the face of Bill.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43790</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:57:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aspergers</category>
		<category>autism</category>
		<category>billgates</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>humour</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>ui</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>nthdegx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the browser.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34649/Never%2Ddoubt%2Dthat%2Da%2Dsmall%2Dgroup%2Dof%2Dthoughtful%2Dcommitted%2Dpeople%2Dcan%2Dchange%2Dthe%2Dbrowser</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/"&gt;Internet Explorer 7.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://dean.edwards.name/&quot;&gt;Dean Edwards&lt;/a&gt; does what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/&quot;&gt;a team of developers with billions behind them&lt;/a&gt; apparently can&apos;t --  update IE to work with modern standards. Almost, anyway... as he says, it&apos;s still in alpha, and has its quirks, but check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/compatibility/Pure%20CSS%20Menus.html&quot;&gt;Pure CSS Menus demo&lt;/a&gt;, for example.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34649</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>css</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>webdevelopment</category>
		<dc:creator>weston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11594/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-202-7560391.html"&gt;Is it sloppy programming, or do full computer security vulnerability disclosure make it too easy for hackers?&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/columns/security/noarch.asp&quot;&gt;personal interest &lt;/a&gt;in minimizing the exploit of their code, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2615973,00.html&quot;&gt;the evil you know &lt;/a&gt;is better than the evil you don&apos;t.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20001003S0001/1&quot;&gt;Others have weighed in &lt;/a&gt;on this debate in the past, or provided a &lt;a href=&quot;http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/default.asp?sid=1&amp;pid=47&amp;aid=48&quot;&gt;fair but vague blueprint &lt;/a&gt;for the computer security community.  Do you think that a middle ground exists?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11594</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:20:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>secutity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8908/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.licenturion.com/xp/fully-licensed-wpa.txt"&gt;Someone reverse engineered&lt;/a&gt; the Win-XP activation mechanism. It&apos;s not as bad as many people thought. It&apos;s certainly no cause for paranoia.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8908</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2001 23:06:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activation</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>programming</category>
		<category>reverseengineered</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


