<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with promiscuity</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/promiscuity</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'promiscuity' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:03:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:03:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sexy time</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62773/Sexy%2Dtime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/books/chapters/0708-1st-land.html"&gt;Have More Sex! I&apos;ll get less AIDS!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.econ.rochester.edu/Faculty/Landsburg.html&quot;&gt;University of Rochester&lt;/a&gt; professor, Slate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/?id=3944&amp;qp=26302&quot;&gt;columnist&lt;/a&gt; and pop-&lt;a href=&quot;&lt;a href=&quot; http://netec.mcc.ac.uk/jokec.html&gt;economist&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0029177766/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;du&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000645WQ/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;jour&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.landsburg.com/&quot;&gt;Steven Landsburg&lt;/a&gt; argues in his newest book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1416532218/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;More Sex is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics&lt;/a&gt;, that those among us who take few sexual partners would better serve the greater good by being &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; promiscuous.  So, who&apos;s chaste, condom-equipped and free tonight?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62773</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:03:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aids</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>jckll</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Girl Gone Mild</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62590/Girl%2DGone%2DMild</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.modestlyyours.net/modestly_yours/wendy_shalit/index.html"&gt;Wendy Shalit keeps it genteel.&lt;/a&gt; The author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radicalmiddle.com/x_shalit.htm&quot;&gt;A Return to Modesty&lt;/a&gt; recently put out a new book, entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1400064732/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Girls Gone Mild&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Shalit reveals how the media, one&#8217;s peers, and even parents can undermine girls&#8217; quests for their authentic selves, details the problems of sex without intimacy, and explains what it means to break from the herd mentality and choose integrity over popularity.&quot;  Audio: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wamu.org/programs/dr/07/07/02.php#13255&quot;&gt;Shalit on the Diane Rehm Show&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62590</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:22:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>feminism2.0</category>
		<category>mores</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<category>wendyshalit</category>
		<dc:creator>psmealey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Political Science &amp;amp; Promiscuity</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51500/Political%2DScience%2Dand%2DPromiscuity</link>
		<description> &quot;The mind-set that invites a couple to use contraception is an anti-child mind-set,&quot; she told me. &quot;So when a baby is conceived accidentally, the couple already have this negative attitude toward the child. Therefore seeking an abortion is a natural outcome. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/07/magazine/07contraception.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;We
oppose all forms of contraception.&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Don&apos;t even mention the mind-set behind &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wesjones.com/specter2.htm&quot;&gt;a vaccine for HPV&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51500</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:01:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>americantaliban</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>contraception</category>
		<category>hpv</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<dc:creator>missbossy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Male Infidelity, Uh, Hardwired?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27390/Is%2DMale%2DInfidelity%2DUh%2DHardwired</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10691-2003Jul31.html"&gt;Is Male Infidelity Hardwired?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;cite&gt;Washington Post&lt;/cite&gt; reports on an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~culture/Schmitt.htm&quot;&gt;academic study&lt;/a&gt; by the International Sexuality Description Project that &quot;found that men everywhere--whether single, married or gay--want more sexual partners than women do.&quot; Part of the research may have come from &lt;a href=&quot;http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/faculty/mmills_fp/research/relation/&quot;&gt;this web site&lt;/a&gt;, which is run by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradley.edu/academics/las/psy/drschmitt.html&quot;&gt;the author&lt;/a&gt; of the survey.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27390</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>humansexuality</category>
		<category>infidelity</category>
		<category>malesexuality</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexdrive</category>
		<category>sexualdrive</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18949/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=13648"&gt;Promiscuity is good.&lt;/a&gt;  I knew something felt right about the &apos;70s. (courtesy of &lt;a href=http://www.aldaily.com/&gt;Arts &amp;amp; Letters&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18949</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 05:22:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthropology</category>
		<category>benefits</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>evolutionary</category>
		<category>good</category>
		<category>infidelity</category>
		<category>multiplepartners</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>virtues</category>
		<dc:creator>fpatrick</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10684/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/09/21/terror/index.html"&gt;&quot;Terror Sex&quot;?&lt;/a&gt; Geez...&quot;next on Oprah!&quot;, or maybe somewhere on cable.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10684</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:43:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>Manhattan</category>
		<category>NewYorkCity</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>TerrorSex</category>
		<dc:creator>BarneyFifesBullet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2723/</link>
		<description> &lt;small&gt;This isn&apos;t anything new, or really all that interesting, it&apos;s hardly a link, but, Steven posted similar material, and this is certainly not some bait. Just, it might be interesting to hear your opinion. Ohh, and I apologize for it being this long.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

While trying to find when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://musicboxtheatre.com/comingsoon.html&quot;&gt;kubrick festival thing &lt;/a&gt; at the music box will be, I found they were playing &lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/CommentsShow?181810&quot;&gt;Sex: The Annabel Chong Story&lt;/a&gt;, below they also had a quote : &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&quot;A man shags 251 women on camera and he is proclaimed a stud. He is admired. Why am I not regarded in the same way? I am a stud!&quot; - Annabel Chong&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

My immediate thought was, well, confusing. Where I wouldn&apos;t exactly call someone who just &quot;shagged&quot; 251 women a &quot;stud&quot;, I wouldn&apos;t really look all that much down on him either. I&apos;m not implying that Ms. Chong is the scum of the earth or anything, but I would certainly think just that much more of the man. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Is it me? I checked imdb&apos;s page, and a lot of the reviews had the same questions, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&quot;I didn&apos;t know quite what to expect from this film. I didn&apos;t expect light and fluffy, but this movie, which documents the life of one weird nymphette, was less enjoyable than I could have imagined. Ms. Chong (not her real name) had a very decent middle class upbringing. &lt;b&gt;The question I asked myself was why she turned out the way she did&lt;/b&gt;&quot; &lt;br&gt;
And many more such reviews, which I won&apos;t cite, since I&apos;m already taking up half the page, but you get the point.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why? Our standard of women higher? Or, are we (some of us) (men), just can&apos;t stand for this sort of a thing, because we envision any woman as a mother, as maybe a wife? Easy answer might be Morals and Ethics, that it&apos;s simply not very, ahmn, in a lot of people&apos;s opinion, it&apos;s not right (it&apos;s dirty). Ok, going too far ahead here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

What are your thoughts on this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2723</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 12:33:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>annabelchong</category>
		<category>chatfilter</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>tiaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1863/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000526/en/television-sex_1.html"&gt;Apparently,&lt;/a&gt; there&apos;s a link between today&apos;s television programming and promiscuity in teenagers. I&apos;d say its because overly-censored American tv is so boring that most teenagers would prefer to have sex rather than watch that crap.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1863</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2000 12:07:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>promiscuity</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>teenagers</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<dc:creator>sammy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


