<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with proposition8</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/proposition8</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'proposition8' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:24:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:24:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>In Washington State, echoes of Proposition 8</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82105/In%2DWashington%2DState%2Dechoes%2Dof%2DProposition%2D8</link>
		<description> In September of 2004, a Superior Court in Washington state ruled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seattlepi.com/local/189761_samesex07ww.html&quot;&gt;the state&apos;s 1998 &quot;Defense of Marriage&quot; act unconstitutional&lt;/a&gt;, a ruling which would have allowed the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. In 2006, the state Supreme Court issued in an opinion in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/cases/andersen-v-king-county.html&quot;&gt;Andersen v. King County&lt;/a&gt; overturning the lower court&apos;s ruling, noting &quot;that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courts.wa.gov/newsinfo/content/pdf/759341opn.pdf&quot;&gt;our decision&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[pdf]&lt;/small&gt; is not based on an independent
determination of what we believe the law should be.&quot; The legislature, in response, &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004278712_webdomestic12.html&quot;&gt;created the state-registered domestic partnership&lt;/a&gt; in 2007, expanding many (but not all) marriage-related rights to same-sex couples. Last month, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1236&amp;newsType=1&quot;&gt;a new law expanded the partnership&lt;/a&gt; to cover the remaining rights, creating an &quot;all-but-marriage&quot; partnership.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This year, the Washington Values Alliance has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valuesaction.org/index.php/information-center/press-releases/127-coalition-files-referendum-71-to-protect-marriage-and-children.html&quot;&gt;filed Referendum 71&lt;/a&gt;, which would put this expansion to a ballot vote. The referendum will need 120,000 signatures to make it to the ballot. &lt;a href=&quot;http://whosigned.org/&quot;&gt;WhoSigned.org intends to make these signatures searchable&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/78197/Google-Political-Transparency&quot;&gt;Predictably&lt;/a&gt;, this is &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/archives/170008.asp&quot;&gt;creating&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009286787_webpartnership01.html&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/06/01/publishing-their-names&quot;&gt;controversy&lt;/a&gt;. In the meantime, Referendum 71 doesn&apos;t seem to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washblog.com/story/2009/5/5/134834/1359&quot;&gt;finding much support&lt;/a&gt; from likely allies. If it does make it to the ballot, voters hoping to maintain rights for same-sex couples should vote &lt;i&gt;yes&lt;/i&gt; to uphold the law as signed. Confused? &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.secstate.wa.gov/FromOurCorner/index.php/2009/05/confused-about-referendum-choice/&quot;&gt;The Secretary of State&apos;s office understands&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;Bonus Washington state ballot item: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/initiatives/people.aspx?y=2007&quot;&gt;Initiative 957&lt;/a&gt; (which never made it to the ballot) would have required couples to procreate within three years of marriage or face annulment. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82105</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:24:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>71</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>local</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prop8</category>
		<category>proposition8</category>
		<category>referendum</category>
		<category>referendum71</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>samesex</category>
		<category>state</category>
		<category>washington</category>
		<category>washingtonvaluesalliance</category>
		<category>whosigned</category>
		<category>yeson71waitnowaityes</category>
		<dc:creator>0xFCAF</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Take Cover, Gay Marriage Apocalypse A-Brewin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80694/Take%2DCover%2DGay%2DMarriage%2DApocalypse%2DABrewin</link>
		<description> Oh noes, those &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/us/08webvermont.html&quot;&gt;gay newlyweds&lt;/a&gt; are causing Biblical rainstorms!! An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wp76ly2_NoI&quot;&gt;ominous new TV ad&lt;/a&gt; by the National Organization for Marriage -- who helped pass &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8_(2008)&quot;&gt;Prop. 8&lt;/a&gt; in California -- features a &quot;rainbow coalition&quot; of folks to warn America that marriage equality advocates want to &quot;take away&quot; your &quot;freedom&quot; by pushing the issue &quot;far beyond same-sex couples.&quot; Unfortunately for NOM, the profound seriousness of this threat has been undermined by a leak of &lt;a href=&quot;http://gawker.com/5204097/cry-laugh-at-worlds-dumbest-anti+gay-ad-auditions&quot;&gt;audition reels&lt;/a&gt; for the ad.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80694</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:46:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>Mormons</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Proposition8</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Google Political Transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78197/Google%2DPolitical%2DTransparency</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eightmaps.com/"&gt;A Mash-Up of Google Maps and the Proposition 8 Donor List&lt;/a&gt; [via the &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfist.com/2009/01/09/mash-up_map_of_google_maps_and_prop.php&quot;&gt;SFist&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78197</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaignfinances</category>
		<category>donors</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>gayrights</category>
		<category>googlemaps</category>
		<category>googlemapsmashup</category>
		<category>mashup</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prop8</category>
		<category>proposition8</category>
		<dc:creator>Weebot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Two Steps Forward, One Step Back</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76262/Two%2DSteps%2DForward%2DOne%2DStep%2DBack</link>
		<description> It&apos;s morning in America again -- but for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mE8yapuEIJY&quot;&gt;thousands of committed gay couples who got married in California&lt;/a&gt; [warning: Dan Fogelberg music, sweet visuals], the long nightmare of intolerance and hate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/election/races/2008/11/04/CA/c/i_proposition/i_1_8_same_sex_marriage_ban/g_ballot_issue/c/california.shtml&quot;&gt;is not yet over&lt;/a&gt; with the probable victory of Proposition 8. Supported by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/10/21/america/Palin-Gay-Marriage.php&quot;&gt;the anti-equality stances of Sarah Palin&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrzThqzV4fM&quot;&gt;&quot;divinely&quot; inspired others&lt;/a&gt;, and paid for by &lt;a href=&quot;http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pe2023SzWXxE8wYX5qWeoIw&quot;&gt;members of the Mormon Church&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/the-blackwater.html&quot;&gt;mother of Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater&lt;/a&gt;, many of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2008/10/16/3856&quot;&gt;ads&lt;/a&gt; for Prop. 8 featured the faces of Obama and Joe Biden, who declared their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=D5B9771BB5737EEAC90142A95F85C477?diaryId=7959&quot;&gt;opposition to the initiative but refused to support equal marriage rights&lt;/a&gt; for all, preferring to talk about &quot;civil unions.&quot; Even excellent Democratic-leaning politics sites like Talking Points Memo were &lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/04/those_prop_8_ads/&quot;&gt;saturated with the deceptive ads&lt;/a&gt;, which overwhelmed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj-0xMrsyxE&quot;&gt;those comparing the proposition to other forms of discrimination in California&apos;s history&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76262</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blackwater</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>civilunions</category>
		<category>equality</category>
		<category>ErikPrince</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>Mormon</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>Proposition8</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Will the Mormon Church decide who gets married in California?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75903/Will%2Dthe%2DMormon%2DChurch%2Ddecide%2Dwho%2Dgets%2Dmarried%2Din%2DCalifornia</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hcn.org/issues/40.19/prophets-and-politics"&gt;Prophets and politics.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Mormon Church &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/10/the-mormon-fact.html&quot;&gt;works to ban&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/22/MNJA13MEUP.DTL&quot;&gt;gay marriage in California&lt;/a&gt;, even as gay people in places like Rexburg, Idaho, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mormonsformarriage.com/&quot;&gt;come out of the LDS closet&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75903</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilRights</category>
		<category>CultureWars</category>
		<category>GayMarriage</category>
		<category>GayRights</category>
		<category>Homophobia</category>
		<category>Homosexuality</category>
		<category>Marriage</category>
		<category>Mormonism</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Proposition8</category>
		<category>Religion</category>
		<category>SameSexMarriage</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The states of marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75548/The%2Dstates%2Dof%2Dmarriage</link>
		<description> Just as a California campaign for a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&amp;entry_id=31285&quot;&gt;Constitutional&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/06/MNHB1388I5.DTL&amp;hw=prop&amp;sn=010&amp;sc=272&quot;&gt;ban&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/opinion/29mon3.html?ref=opinion&quot;&gt;same-sex marriage&lt;/a&gt; (allowed since &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/16/MNDB118S9N.DTL&quot;&gt;June 16, 2008&lt;/a&gt;) is heating up the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2008/10/10/conn_supreme_court_ruling_same_sex_marriage_case/&quot;&gt;Connecticut Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; has followed suit and overturned bans on same-sex marriage in that state. They are the third state in the nation to do so, following California earlier this year and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/04/gay.marriage/index.html&quot;&gt;Massachusetts in 2004&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/02/nyregion/02samesex.html&quot;&gt;New York State&lt;/a&gt; does not perform, but does recognize as legally-valid, such marriages. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75548</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:13:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>connecticut</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>massachusetts</category>
		<category>proposition8</category>
		<category>samesexmarriage</category>
		<category>statelaw</category>
		<dc:creator>liketitanic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


