<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with psychology and Politics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/psychology+Politics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'psychology' and 'Politics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:06:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:06:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Conservatives are scaredy-cats</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75044/Conservatives%2Dare%2Dscaredycats</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sciencenow;2008/918/2&quot;&gt;The Politics of Fear&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=112246&amp;org=NSF&quot;&gt;Some Political Views May be Related to Physiology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/politics.swf&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/podcast/hibbing.mp3&quot;&gt;audio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; news stories - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7623256.stm&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;British Broadcasting Corporation&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080919/NEWS03/809190354/1022/LIVING02&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94764491&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;National Public Radio&quot;&gt;NPR&lt;/acronym&gt; with audio&lt;/a&gt;

Plus, a 2006 lecture on the heritability of political attitudes by John Hibbing, one of the authors of the above study - &lt;a href=&quot;http://videocast.com/episode/19080427/&quot;&gt;flash video&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unl.edu/unlpub/podcasts/videofiles/HibbingsNebraskaLecture.m4v&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;Moving Picture Experts Group&quot;&gt;MPEG&lt;/acronym&gt;4 download&lt;/a&gt;, starts at around 10:00 and runs for about an hour  (during the intro &lt;acronym title=&quot;by the way&quot;&gt;btw&lt;/acronym&gt; he quips &quot;I&apos;m a social scientist pretending to be a scientist...&quot;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75044</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>physiology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>XMLicious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Negating a frame activates that frame</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74847/Negating%2Da%2Dframe%2Dactivates%2Dthat%2Dframe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/election08/98453/dont_think_of_a_maverick_could_the_obama_campaign_be_improved/?page=entire"&gt;Don&apos;t Think of a Maverick!&lt;/a&gt; George &lt;a href=&quot;http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/people/person_detail.php?person=21&quot;&gt;Lakoff&lt;/a&gt; offers some tips on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/projects/strategic/simple_framing/&quot;&gt;framing&lt;/a&gt; to the Obama campaign.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74847</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Frames</category>
		<category>Framing</category>
		<category>Lakoff</category>
		<category>Language</category>
		<category>Maverick</category>
		<category>McCain</category>
		<category>Obama</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Niccolo Machiavelli</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74811/Niccolo%2DMachiavelli</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2008/09/15/080915crat_atlarge_pierpont"&gt;The Florentine.&lt;/a&gt; Niccol&amp;#0242; &lt;a href=&quot;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/machiavelli/&quot;&gt;Machiavelli&lt;/a&gt;, the man who taught rulers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/machiavelli-prince.html&quot;&gt;how to rule&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74811</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:35:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Florence</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>Italy</category>
		<category>Machiavelli</category>
		<category>Machiavellian</category>
		<category>Medici</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Renaissance</category>
		<category>Republicanism</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Saddam Sessions</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68566/The%2DSaddam%2DSessions</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/24/60minutes/main3749494.shtml"&gt;Saddam&apos;s Confessions&lt;/a&gt; - Given Saddam Hussein&apos;s central place in the American Consciousness over the last couple decades and particularly in recent years, I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3756675n&quot;&gt;60 minutes&apos; interview&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3756702n&quot;&gt;with FBI interrogator&lt;/a&gt; George Piro pretty fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68566</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:33:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>GeorgePiro</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>obituary</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>protest</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Myth-busters have the odds against them</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64458/Mythbusters%2Dhave%2Dthe%2Dodds%2Dagainst%2Dthem</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/03/AR2007090300933_pf.html"&gt;Persistence of Myths Could Alter Public Policy Approach.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The conventional response to myths and urban legends is to counter bad information with accurate information. But the &lt;a href=http://sitemaker.umich.edu/norbert.schwarz/files/07_aep_schwarz_et_al_setting-people-straight.pdf&gt;new&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/psp925821.pdf&gt;psychological&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il/~mschul/yaacov_schul_files/2004-mayo&amp;schul&amp;burnstein-neg.pdf&gt;studies&lt;/a&gt; (PDFs) show that denials and clarifications, for all their intuitive appeal, can paradoxically contribute to the resiliency of popular myths.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.firedoglake.com/&gt;Firedoglake&lt;/a&gt;, more at &lt;a href=http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2007/09/infowar_strike_earl.html&gt;MindHacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64458</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:30:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bullshit</category>
		<category>Evidence</category>
		<category>Gullibility</category>
		<category>Memory</category>
		<category>Mythbusters</category>
		<category>Mythbusting</category>
		<category>Myths</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Propaganda</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Rationality</category>
		<category>Truth</category>
		<category>UrbanLegends</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Death Grip</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64274/Death%2DGrip</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070827&amp;amp;s=judis082707"&gt;Death Grip: How Political Psychology Explains Bush&apos;s Ghastly Success.&lt;/a&gt; Interesting article on the &lt;a href=http://web.uccs.edu/kgeddes/introduction.htm&gt;work&lt;/a&gt; of psychologists Jeff Greenberg, &lt;a href=http://www.esi-topics.com/terrorism/interviews/SheldonSolomon.html&gt;Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.disinfo.com/site/&gt;Disinformation&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64274</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:45:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Anxiety</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Conservatism</category>
		<category>Death</category>
		<category>Election</category>
		<category>Fear</category>
		<category>Mortality</category>
		<category>Mythology</category>
		<category>PoliticalPsychology</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>Unconscious</category>
		<category>Voting</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Follow the links!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58728/Follow%2Dthe%2Dlinks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey"&gt;The Authoritarians&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Altemeyer&quot;&gt;Robert Altemeyer&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s book on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_Wing_Authoritarianism&quot;&gt;authoritarianism&lt;/a&gt; is freely available online [&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/2007/02/17.html#a2092&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58728</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:13:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>altemeyer</category>
		<category>authoritarianism</category>
		<category>authority</category>
		<category>ideology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>power</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Ideological Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57624/The%2DIdeological%2DAnimal</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20061222-000001.xml"&gt;The Ideological Animal.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;We think our political stance is the product of reason, but we&apos;re easily manipulated and surprisingly malleable. Our essential political self is more a stew of childhood temperament, education, and fear of death. Call it the 9/11 effect.&lt;/em&gt; Or the Metafilter effect. &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[ducks]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57624</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:55:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ideology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>gottabefunky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>ragnarok now? or is it all just in your head?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46040/ragnarok%2Dnow%2Dor%2Dis%2Dit%2Dall%2Djust%2Din%2Dyour%2Dhead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2361/"&gt;Why do we always seem to expect the worst from some people?&lt;/a&gt; By now, it&apos;s common knowledge that media reports of widespread looting, violence and sexual assault in the wake of Katrina&apos;s strike on New Orleans were grossly exaggerated, but why? Some might attribute such distortions to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?article_id=218392581&amp;cat=1_7&quot;&gt;unconscious bias&lt;/a&gt;, offering up some hope of alleviating racial tension by bringing unexamined racial biases to light; still others see the problem of racial tension as an intractable one, leading inevitably to an all-out clash of cultures--even finding &quot;evidence&quot; of the inevitably of such a conflict in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_003.html&quot;&gt;unlikeliest of places.&lt;/a&gt; Still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/10/15/nazi.march/&quot;&gt;others seem especially eager&lt;/a&gt; to bring all these tensions to a head. What&apos;s really going on these days? Is racial tension ultimately a political problem or, as some suggest, a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reason.com/0505/cr.js.thomas.shtml&quot;&gt;psychological one&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46040</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:46:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racial</category>
		<category>relations</category>
		<dc:creator>all-seeing eye dog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Natural Born Liars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40326/Natural%2DBorn%2DLiars</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/benson071503.html"&gt;If natural born leaders are also natural born liars,&lt;/a&gt; can we really hold it against them when they do what comes naturally? Maybe instead of dwelling on it, we just need a little more &lt;a href=&#8221;http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/healthmindandbody/0,6121,1417563,00.html&gt;sanity&lt;/a&gt; in our lives. Or are we better off &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1423450,00.html&#8221;&gt;deluding ourselves&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:58:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthropology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>all-seeing eye dog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservatism: resistance to change, simplistic black and white ethics, and the acceptance of inequality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27272/Conservatism%2Dresistance%2Dto%2Dchange%2Dsimplistic%2Dblack%2Dand%2Dwhite%2Dethics%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dacceptance%2Dof%2Dinequality</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33714"&gt;Conservatism: resistance to change, simplistic black and white ethics, and the acceptance of inequality.&lt;/a&gt; In what&apos;s sure to be considered a controversial paper by many, Berkeley psychologists analyze conservatives to see what makes them tick.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33772&quot;&gt;The criticisms have already begun.&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml&quot;&gt;official press release here&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27272</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:07:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analysis</category>
		<category>Berkeley</category>
		<category>conservatism</category>
		<category>conservatives</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>right</category>
		<category>university</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Frontier Psychology</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25467/Frontier%2DPsychology</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jcpa.org/dje/books/am-ch3.htm"&gt;Frontier Psychology&lt;/a&gt; - Does Frontier Psychology drive America in a direction that the rest of the world cannot comprehend?  Roughly defined as &quot;&lt;i&gt;the effort on the part of Americans to come to grips with untamed elements of nature and, by taming them, to reorganize their society&lt;/i&gt;&quot;  We see it everywhere, even in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ivyweb.net/btvs/fictionary/essays/010929A_DED.htm&quot;&gt;Buffy&lt;/a&gt;.   Europe appears to value stability over mobility and change, in opposition to America.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wesleyan.edu/wesmaps/course9900/faculty/slotkin231.htm&quot;&gt;Prof. Richard Slotkin&lt;/a&gt; has written extensively about these concepts.  An interiew with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulagordon.com/shows/slotkin/&quot;&gt;audio clips is here&lt;/a&gt;. (Real)
&lt;br&gt;
Are America&apos;s recent domestic and international policy decisions attempts to tame &quot;untamed elements&quot; around it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25467</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:45:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>America</category>
		<category>Buffy</category>
		<category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>FrontierPsychology</category>
		<category>JerusalemCenterForPublicAffairs</category>
		<category>PoliticalCulture</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>RichardSlotkin</category>
		<dc:creator>Argyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


