<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with psychology and consciousness</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/psychology+consciousness</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'psychology' and 'consciousness' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:11:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:11:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>On Being Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/120008/On%2DBeing%2DNothing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/09/on-being-nothing/"&gt;&quot;... bitterness, instead of a form of &lt;em&gt;dis&lt;/em&gt;illusionment, is really the refusal to give up your childhood illusions of importance&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - Brian Jay Stanley  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.120008</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:11:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anxiety</category>
		<category>attention</category>
		<category>bitterness</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>disappointment</category>
		<category>ego</category>
		<category>essays</category>
		<category>failure</category>
		<category>humancondition</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>perspective</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>recognition</category>
		<category>society</category>
		<dc:creator>mrgrimm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Soul Niche</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/100216/The%2DSoul%2DNiche</link>
		<description> Swimming around in a mixture of language and matter, humans occupy a particular evolutionary niche mediated by something we call &apos;consciousness&apos;. To Professor Nicholas Humphrey we&apos;re made up of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9373000/9373317.stm&quot;&gt;soul dust&lt;/a&gt;&quot;: &quot;a kind of theatre... an entertainment which we put on for ourselves inside our own heads.&quot; But just as that theatre is directed by the relationship between language and matter, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jan/09/soul-dust-nicholas-humphrey-review&quot;&gt;it is also undermined by it&lt;/a&gt;. It all depends how you think it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2011:site.100216</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>book</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>perception</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>soul</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Signatures of Consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87186/Signatures%2Dof%2DConsciousness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/dehaene09/dehaene09_index.html"&gt;12 years in the making, a good working hypothesis about the nature of conciousness.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;For the past twelve years my research team has been using all the brain research tools at its disposal, from functional MRI to electro- and magneto-encephalography and even electrodes inserted deep in the human brain, to shed  light on the brain mechanisms of consciousness.

I am now happy to report that we have acquired a  good working hypothesis. In experiment after experiment, we have seen the same signatures of consciousness: physiological markers that all, simultaneously, show a massive change when a person reports becoming aware of a piece of information (say a word, a digit or a sound).&quot; - Stanislas Dehaene&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.87186</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:08:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>thebrain</category>
		<dc:creator>AceRock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Afterlife and the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75721/Afterlife%2Dand%2Dthe%2DMind</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=never-say-die&amp;ec=su_neversaydie&quot;&gt;Never Say Die: Why We Can&apos;t Imagine Death&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;Why do we wonder where our mind goes when the body is dead? Shouldn&#8217;t it be obvious that the mind is dead, too?&lt;/i&gt; Examining self-consciousness and mortality.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afterlife</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>dying</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>mortality</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How well do you know your own thoughts?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68141/How%2Dwell%2Ddo%2Dyou%2Dknow%2Dyour%2Down%2Dthoughts</link>
		<description> &quot;A few years ago a psychologist and a philosopher got into an argument over whether we can accurately describe our thoughts. &quot;Yes,&quot; said the psychologist; with training and the help of my special technique, we can accurately describe our thoughts. The philosopher doubted it. To resolve their argument, they recruited a young woman who agreed tell them her thoughts, so that they could argue over whether she was credible.&quot;  Eric Schwitzgebel and Russ Hurlbert debate &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/01/11/calculating_consciousness/&quot;&gt;the transparency of inner experience&lt;/a&gt;.  See also Schwitzgebel&apos;s extremely interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68141</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:39:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>bookreview</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>experience</category>
		<category>hurlbert</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>schwitzgebel</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Elisabeth Kubler-Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35190/Elisabeth%2DKublerRoss</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elisabethkublerross.com/&quot;&gt;Elizabeth Kubler-Ross&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/death_and_dying/41199&quot;&gt;pioneering psychologist &lt;/a&gt;who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.healthy.net/asp/templates/interview.asp?PageType=Interview&amp;ID=205&quot;&gt;devoted her life to studying death and dying&lt;/a&gt;, has &lt;a href=&quot;http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&amp;sid=aS.oSGgVQ3Gc&amp;refer=us&quot;&gt;moved on&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35190</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:15:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>dying</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>moonbird</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why Smart People Believe Weird Things</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33839/Why%2DSmart%2DPeople%2DBelieve%2DWeird%2DThings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpcoo203859311jun20,0,4497789.story?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines"&gt;On Cognitive Dissonance&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&quot;As a behavioral psychologist, I have studied people&apos;s reactions to contradiction and inconsistency. We are capable of convincing ourselves of something, and the more evidence that builds up to contradict us the more we believe it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

For more than 40 years, social psychologists have studied the phenomenon of &quot;cognitive dissonance&quot; - what happens when people have pieces of information on the same subject that are inconsistent. The presence of contradictions is psychologically unpleasant, and people do whatever it takes to resolve the inconsistency.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Many in the field posit that tension between contradictory thoughts and feelings are what constitutes consciousness.  It doesn&apos;t  seem to me this qualifies as it appears to be highly dysfunctional and not a natural and normal tension.  What say you who are more qualified?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33839</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 06:45:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BehavioralPsychology</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CognitiveDissonance</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>inconsistency</category>
		<category>Newsday</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


