<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pyschology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pyschology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pyschology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>No word on cat ears, tentacles.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74052/No%2Dword%2Don%2Dcat%2Dears%2Dtentacles</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&apos;http://inventorspot.com/articles/girls_get_anime_look_with_extrawide_contact_lenses_16872&apos;&gt;So you want to look like an anime character?&lt;/a&gt; Because &lt;a href=&apos;http://psychcentral.com/news/2008/04/10/sexual-intentions-may-be-in-the-face/2140.html&apos;&gt;wide eyes are more attractive, and, ahem, easier.&lt;/a&gt; And &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/003842.html&apos;&gt;blue eyes are more attractive, but only to blue-eyed men.&lt;/a&gt; (This post is dedicated to &lt;a href=&apos;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12815/#347527&apos;&gt;....&lt;/a&gt;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74052</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anime</category>
		<category>attraction</category>
		<category>contacts</category>
		<category>eyes</category>
		<category>pyschology</category>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How To Win An Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44861/How%2DTo%2DWin%2DAn%2DArgument</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/08/how-to-win-an-argument/"&gt;How To Win An Argument.&lt;/a&gt; Plus, if you scroll down, you&apos;ll find an argument about &quot;How To Win An Argument.&quot; (Which may remind you of a Monty Python &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindspring.com/~mfpatton/sketch.htm&quot;&gt;skit&lt;/a&gt;.) What do you think of this guy&apos;s strategy? Compassionate or passive-aggressive?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44861</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:31:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aggressive</category>
		<category>argument</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>fighting</category>
		<category>passive</category>
		<category>pyschology</category>
		<dc:creator>grumblebee</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>With suggestions for dealing with him now and after Germany&apos;s surrender.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40848/With%2Dsuggestions%2Dfor%2Ddealing%2Dwith%2Dhim%2Dnow%2Dand%2Dafter%2DGermanys%2Dsurrender</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/library/donovan/hitler/"&gt;Analysis of the Personality of Adolf Hitler&lt;/a&gt; by Cornell University in 1943 has been released online.  The analysis was comissioned by the predecessor to the CIA and declassified several years ago, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/31/science/31hitler.html&quot;&gt;The New York Times&lt;/a&gt;. This official analysis should be of interest to those who have been doing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abelard.org/hitler/hitler.htm&quot;&gt;amateur analyses&lt;/a&gt; for years.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40848</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:56:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analysis</category>
		<category>hitler</category>
		<category>pyschology</category>
		<category>ww2</category>
		<dc:creator>grapefruitmoon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


