<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with rathergate</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/rathergate</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'rathergate' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:12:39 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:12:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>That&apos;s a rather lot of money</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64851/Thats%2Da%2Drather%2Dlot%2Dof%2Dmoney</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/business/media/19cnd-rather.html?_r=1&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1190239131-1L3+wSfQ3zUqxNdK4UJt6A&quot;&gt;Dan Rather sues Viacom and CBS for $70 million.&lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/09/19/drscan.002.pdf&quot;&gt;Complaint (PDF).&lt;/a&gt; From the complaint: &lt;i&gt;Central to defendants&apos; plans to pacify the White House was to offer Mr. Rather as the public face of the story, and as a scapegoat for CBS management&apos;s bungling of the entire episode - which, as a direct result, became known publicly as &quot;Rathergate.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rathergate&quot;&gt;Killian documents.&lt;/a&gt;  Previously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/35519/CBS-and-Internet-Fisking&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/35631/Id-like-to-break-that-story&quot;&gt;two.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64851</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:12:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cbs</category>
		<category>danrather</category>
		<category>lawsuit</category>
		<category>rathergate</category>
		<category>viacom</category>
		<dc:creator>starman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get rich quick! well, maybe not so rich...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41930/Get%2Drich%2Dquick%2Dwell%2Dmaybe%2Dnot%2Dso%2Drich</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/entry/Gawker_Bucks_vs_Journalists_Bucks"&gt;Gawker bucks vs journalists&apos; bucks.&lt;/a&gt; The idea of bloggers going pro, though a relatively new one, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/javascript/2002/08/12/megnut.html&quot;&gt;has been discussed for a few years now&lt;/a&gt;. With blogging &lt;a href=&quot;http://paulboutin.weblogger.com/2002/03/20&quot;&gt;being discussed in the same breath as mainstream journalism&lt;/a&gt;, especially &lt;a href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/archives/2004/07/27/bloggers_versus_journalists.html&quot;&gt;since last year&apos;s election&lt;/a&gt; in which the two activities &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rathergate.com/&quot;&gt;seemed to clash&lt;/a&gt; in a very public way, is it time to ask ourselves &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.corante.com/mooreslore/archives/2005/04/29/is_blogging_journalism.php&quot;&gt;if blogging is or can be just another form of journalism&lt;/a&gt; with its own &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050412glaser/&quot;&gt;professional personalities and success-based pay rates&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41930</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 15:37:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>denton</category>
		<category>gawker</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rathergate</category>
		<dc:creator>clevershark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


