<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with rebate</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/rebate</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'rebate' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:35:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:35:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stories of where US stimulus checks are going</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72152/Stories%2Dof%2Dwhere%2DUS%2Dstimulus%2Dchecks%2Dare%2Dgoing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.howispentmystimulus.com/"&gt;HowISpentMyStimulus.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;In January, Congress approved $152 billion in economic stimulus checks for millions of American households, intended to boost the economy and avert a recession. Just how this money will be spent remains to be seen. We hope this website helps shed some light on where the stimulus money is going. &lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72152</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:35:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>money</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rebate</category>
		<category>stimulus</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>unclesam</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePinkSuperhero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/software/B000063EN1/002-9430727-1299240"&gt;According to Amazon,&lt;/a&gt; Photoshop 7 is shipping on April 20. The list price is $149 (same as direct from Adobe), and they&apos;ve got a &lt;a href=&quot;http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000063EN1.01.RB03.LZZZZZZZ.jpg&quot;&gt;$20 mail-in rebate&lt;/a&gt; on Photoshop (and a bunch of other programs) until April 25. Plus, you can get free shipping if you select Super Saver Shipping. Can&apos;t wait...I just need this and Flash MX and I&apos;ll be all OS X, all the time.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16148</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adobe</category>
		<category>amazon</category>
		<category>photoshop</category>
		<category>rebate</category>
		<dc:creator>kirkaracha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15006/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/22/opinion/22KRUG.html"&gt;Are we sending our $300 rebate checks right back this year?&lt;/a&gt; According to MIT economist and New York Times writer Paul Krugman, line 47 of the 2001 1040 will be designed to do just that.  NYTimes.com so you know the drill u:metafilter p:metafilter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15006</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:02:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>rebate</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>McBain</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9332/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.detnews.com/2001/politics/0107/26/-254330.htm"&gt;It&apos;s like a paycheck advance, not a rebate.&lt;/a&gt; You thought the great tax relief of 2001 was a rebate on those huge surpluses the US gov&apos;t didn&apos;t know what to do with right? Nope, it&apos;s merely an advance on the refund of taxes you&apos;ll file next year, and here&apos;s the kicker: you may or may not be getting any refund at all next year. Tax relief? Tax rebate? Simply owing the $300 back next April? Who came up with this stupid idea? (truth courtesy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.megnut.com/archive.asp?which=2001_07_01_archive.inc#20010727&quot;&gt;Megnut&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9332</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:50:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>finance</category>
		<category>megnut</category>
		<category>paycheck</category>
		<category>paycheque</category>
		<category>rebate</category>
		<category>surplus</category>
		<category>tax</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8234/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/12/national/12TAX.html"&gt;OK, Maybe I don&apos;t get the $300 tax rebate after all.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;More than one-quarter of all American adults will not get a tax rebate this year. Altogether, nearly 40 percent will not get the full amount of $300 for individuals and $600 for couples.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Nationally, the study shows, 34 million American adults, or 26 percent, will get no rebate, and another 17 million, or 13 percent, will get less than the full rebate.&lt;/i&gt;

This sucks. Why am I not surprised.


 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8234</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:44:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>irs</category>
		<category>rebate</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>tcobretti</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


