<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with redacted</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/redacted</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'redacted' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:17:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:17:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>How to feign security in 93 easy pages</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87304/How%2Dto%2Dfeign%2Dsecurity%2Din%2D93%2Deasy%2Dpages</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/massive-tsa-security-breach-agency-secrets/story?id=9280503"&gt;The TSA has accidentally posted their SOP online.&lt;/a&gt; Not having learned proper redaction techniques after dozens of other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/10/state/n230703S73.DTL&quot;&gt;companies&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/14/AR2007081401784.html?hpid=sec-business&quot;&gt;government agencies&lt;/a&gt; made the same mistake, the TSA posted their complete &quot;Screening Management Standard Operating Procedures&quot; manual online in PDF format. Included, you can find details about how they choose who to search, the limitations of the various scanners in use (metal detectors, x-ray, etc), and easily reproduced examples of badges and paperwork that earn you a free pass through security. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.87304</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:17:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airport</category>
		<category>PDF</category>
		<category>redacted</category>
		<category>securitytheater</category>
		<category>SOP</category>
		<category>TSA</category>
		<dc:creator>pla</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NY Times to black out portions of op-ed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57192/NY%2DTimes%2Dto%2Dblack%2Dout%2Dportions%2Dof%2Doped</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002214.php"&gt;Blacked out text&lt;/a&gt; in your newspaper. The White House has attempted &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/19/washington/19secret.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;to heavily censor&lt;/a&gt; parts of a proposed op-ed about Iran. So tomorrow, the NYT will run the op-ed with black redaction marks, and provide a list of non-classified sources for the exact material the administration claims is sensitive.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.57192</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACCESSDENIED</category>
		<category>Leverett</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>redacted</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<dc:creator>mulligan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


