<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with regression</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/regression</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'regression' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:40:21 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:40:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Embrace your inner indigenous athlete</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81026/Embrace%2Dyour%2Dinner%2Dindigenous%2Dathlete</link>
		<description> Inspired by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_Method&quot;&gt;Natural Method of Georges H&amp;#0233;bert&lt;/a&gt; and trained in Parkour, Frenchman Erwan Le Corre has developed his own curious brand of back-to-nature physical fitness training called &lt;a href=&quot;http://movnat.com&quot;&gt;MovNat&lt;/a&gt;. As this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKGF-ErsJiI&amp;feature=player_embedded&quot;&gt;awesome/humorous video&lt;/a&gt; shows, MovNat basically consists of running around in the woods, climbing trees, jumping over and under obstacles, swimming, and moving heavy objects. Part child&apos;s play, part workout, I must admit it looks like an odd sort of fun. If they promised not to videotape me, I&apos;d consider going on one of these &lt;a href=&quot;http://movnat.com/seminars/brazil&quot;&gt;Brazilian retreats&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81026</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>exercise</category>
		<category>movnat</category>
		<category>regression</category>
		<dc:creator>subpixel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14720/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://crab.rutgers.edu/~goertzel/mythsofmurder.htm"&gt;Here&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; a damning indictment of the (mis)use of regression analysis in the social sciences.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;
[Y]ou may have fallen for a pernicious form of junk science: the use of mathematical models with no demonstrated predictive capability to draw policy conclusions. These studies are superficially impressive. Written by reputable social scientists from prestigious institutions, they often appear in peer reviewed scientific journals. Filled with complex statistical calculations, they give precise numerical &quot;facts&quot; that can be used as debaters&apos; points in policy arguments. But these &quot;facts&quot; are will o&apos; the wisps. Before the ink is dry on one study, another appears with completely different &quot;facts.&quot; Despite their scientific appearance, these models do not meet the fundamental criterion for a useful mathematical model: the ability to make predictions that are better than random chance.
&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14720</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:01:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>misunderstanding</category>
		<category>misuse</category>
		<category>regression</category>
		<category>socialscience</category>
		<dc:creator>electro</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


