<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with replytoall</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/replytoall</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'replytoall' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:52 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM THIS LIST!!!!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78177/PLEASE%2DUNSUBSCRIBE%2DME%2DFROM%2DTHIS%2DLIST</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090110/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/state_department_e_mail&quot;&gt;This week, American diplomats took down the State Department&apos;s email system by using reply-to-all.&lt;/a&gt; They&apos;re not the only ones to make this gaffe. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/220271&quot;&gt;Spirit Airlines&apos; CEO hit reply-to-all in response to a customer complaint. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/02/20/email-gremlins-strike-skaddens-shelia-birnbaum/&quot;&gt;A corporate attorney sent a note intended for a client to a NY Times reporter. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://minnesotaindependent.com/15872/judicial-candidate-hedlund%E2%80%99s-muslim-related-email-gaffe-is-not-the-first-time-she-has-generated-public-controversy&quot;&gt;A Minnesota judicial candidate replies to an email claiming Barack Obama is a Muslim.&lt;/a&gt; Maybe they should read this &lt;a href=&quot;http://email.about.com/od/netiquettetips/qt/et_reply_all.htm&quot;&gt; guide to knowing when not to reply-to-all.&lt;/a&gt; Or their admins should &lt;a href=&quot;http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA011142241033.aspx&quot;&gt;prevent them from using reply-to-all or forward in Outlook.&lt;/a&gt; Also, don&apos;t put everyone&apos;s addresses in the TO: field - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/Another-corporate-email-gaffe/2100-1017_3-224775.html&quot;&gt;Seagate Software&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/ATT-reveals-1%2C800-customer-email-addresses/2100-1017_3-224526.html?tag=mncol&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/Nissan-privacy-goof-exposes-email-addresses/2100-1017_3-224464.html?tag=mncol&quot;&gt;Nissan&lt;/a&gt; found this out the hard way.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78177</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:16:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bcc</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>netiquette</category>
		<category>outlook</category>
		<category>replyall</category>
		<category>replytoall</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


