<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with research and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/research+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'research' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:25:55 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:25:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Politics at the FDA</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53148/Politics%2Dat%2Dthe%2DFDA</link>
		<description> &quot;In 2006, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/fda-scientists-pressured.html&quot;&gt;distributed&lt;/a&gt; a 38-question survey to 5,918 FDA scientists to examine the state of science at the FDA. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/interference/fda-scientist-survey.html&quot;&gt;results&lt;/a&gt; paint a picture of a troubled agency: hundreds of scientists reported significant interference with the FDA&#8217;s scientific work, compromising the agency&#8217;s ability to fulfill its mission of protecting public health and safety.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53148</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:25:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Schaffer Library of Drug Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51742/Schaffer%2DLibrary%2Dof%2DDrug%2DPolicy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/"&gt;Schaffer Library of Drug Policy&lt;/a&gt; - read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/taxact/taxact.htm&quot;&gt;transcripts&lt;/a&gt; of hearings held on the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act, or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/legal/legal1970.htm&quot;&gt;text&lt;/a&gt; of court decisions regarding drug policy, or the well-researched Consumer Unions &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/cu/cumenu.htm&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; on licit and illicit drugs, or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/MISC/beergood.htm&quot;&gt;differences between beer and drugs&lt;/a&gt;, according to Anheuser-Busch. A huge archive of materials, admittedly compiled from a pro-reform perspective.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51742</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 10:06:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>archive</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>illegaldrugs</category>
		<category>library</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>policy</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WarOnDrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>No stem cell research</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31988/No%2Dstem%2Dcell%2Dresearch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/03/25/stem_cells/index.html"&gt;Thou shalt not make scientific progress.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Medical research is poised to make a quantum leap that will benefit sufferers from Alzheimer&apos;s, Parkinson&apos;s, muscular dystrophy, diabetes and other diseases. But George W. Bush&apos;s religious convictions stand in its way.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31988</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:17:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>cells</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medecine</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>progess</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stem</category>
		<category>stemcells</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19524/</link>
		<description> MIT&apos;s R&amp;amp;D for the US Army of the future appears to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://horizoncomics.com/radix/&quot;&gt;based on a comic book&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19524</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boston</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>MIT</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>dchase</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8912/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vny.com/cf/News/upidetail.cfm?QID=201006"&gt;Do Republicans dream of electric sheep?&lt;/a&gt; A new study concludes that Republicans have scarier and more frequent nightmares than Democrats. As usual, the explanation for this is split among party lines:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;What do you expect after eight years of William Jefferson Clinton?&quot; -- &lt;/i&gt;Kevin Sheridan, Republican National Committee deputy press secretary.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&quot;If George W. Bush were the leader of my party, I&apos;d have trouble sleeping at night, too,&quot; -- &lt;/i&gt;Terry McAuliffe, Democratic National Committee chairman.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
Wow... deja vu &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/7924&quot;&gt;all&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/8023&quot;&gt;over&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/8234&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8912</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:03:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>dreams</category>
		<category>nightmares</category>
		<category>partisan</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>sleep</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Dirjy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8860/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediainfo.com/ephome/news/newshtm/stories/070301n1.htm"&gt;Americans less supportive of 1st amendment.&lt;/a&gt; Roughly four in 10 people (41%) said the media have too much freedom. Four in 10 respondents (39%) believed the First Amendment goes too far in guaranteeing rights. 71% said it was &quot;very&quot; or &quot;somewhat&quot; important for the government to hold the media in check.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8860</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2001 02:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FirstAmendment</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>frednorman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


