<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with research and neuroscience</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/research+neuroscience</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'research' and 'neuroscience' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Marching through the claims like Sherman through Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84740/Marching%2Dthrough%2Dthe%2Dclaims%2Dlike%2DSherman%2Dthrough%2DGeorgia</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/214834&quot; title=&quot;Newsweek article published September 3rd&quot;&gt;Neuroscientist Lise Eliot finds that claims of sex differences fall apart.&lt;/a&gt;  In one study, scientists dressed newborns in gender-neutral clothes and misled adults about their sex. The adults described the &quot;boys&quot; (actually girls) as angry or distressed more often than did adults who thought they were observing girls, and described the &quot;girls&quot; (actually boys) as happy and socially engaged more than adults who knew the babies were boys. Dozens of such disguised-gender experiments have shown that adults perceive baby boys and girls differently, seeing identical behavior through a gender-tinted lens. &quot;Eliot immersed herself in hundreds of scientific papers (her bibliography runs 46 pages). Marching through the claims like Sherman through Georgia, she explains that assertions of innate sex differences in the brain are either &quot;blatantly false,&quot; &quot;cherry-picked from single studies,&quot; or &quot;extrapolated from rodent research&quot; without being confirmed in people. For instance, the idea that the band of fibers connecting the right and left brain is larger in women, supposedly supporting their more &quot;holistic&quot; thinking, is based on a single 1982 study of only 14 brains. Fifty other studies, taken together, found no such sex difference&#8212;not in adults, not in newborns. Other baseless claims: that women are hard-wired to read faces and tone of voice, to defuse conflict, and to form deep friendships; and that &quot;girls&apos; brains are wired for communication and boys&apos; for aggression.&quot; Eliot&apos;s inescapable conclusion: there is &quot;little solid evidence of sex differences in children&apos;s brains.&quot;&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84740</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boys</category>
		<category>Children</category>
		<category>Gender</category>
		<category>Girls</category>
		<category>LiseEliot</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Newsweek</category>
		<category>Research</category>
		<category>Sex</category>
		<dc:creator>cashman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>test your your brain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81825/test%2Dyour%2Dyour%2Dbrain</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.testmybrain.org/?page=home&quot;&gt;Test My Brain&lt;/a&gt; was set up by Harvard&apos;s Vision Lab and Social Neuroscience and Psychopathology Lab.  There are five tests online at the time of this post; take one and maybe you&apos;ll learn something about yourself that you may not have known (other than your special ability to slack off on MetaFilter when you should be working).  At the same time, you&apos;ll be helping researchers collect data from a wide range of subjects.  One of the collaborators, Professor Ken Nakayama, is also responsible for creating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.faceblind.org/facetests/&quot;&gt;these online tests&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.faceblind.org/research/index.html&quot;&gt;faceblindness.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/29500/I-have-trouble-with-faces&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; &lt;small&gt;[Disclaimer: I work at Harvard, but not in the same department; I know none of the collaborators.]&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81825</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>faceblindness</category>
		<category>harvard</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>prosopagnosia</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>tests</category>
		<dc:creator>not_on_display</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Eternal Sunshine Within Reach.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80912/Eternal%2DSunshine%2DWithin%2DReach</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/health/research/06brain.html?_r=1&amp;amp;th=&amp;amp;emc=th&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Brain Researchers Open Door to Editing Memory&lt;/a&gt; : spotless minds might be closer than we think.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80912</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>memory</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<dc:creator>grapefruitmoon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dreaming is a private thing.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77353/Dreaming%2Dis%2Da%2Dprivate%2Dthing</link>
		<description> A team of researchers at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cns.atr.jp/dcn/&quot;&gt;ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories&lt;/a&gt; in Kyoto have managed to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pinktentacle.com/2008/12/scientists-extract-images-directly-from-brain/&quot;&gt;reconstruct black-and-white visual images&lt;/a&gt; from an fMRI scan of a test subject&apos;s brain. &lt;a href=&quot;http://brainwindows.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/263/&quot;&gt;Some more examples of the recovered data.&lt;/a&gt; The organization responsible claims that the technology to record thoughts and dreams is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iHHbFXQZuavHidN1Q9SGJkt67hXA&quot;&gt;just around the corner.&lt;/a&gt; The paper, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.004&quot;&gt;&quot;Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, is the cover article of the December 10 issue of the journal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cell.com/neuron/&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Neuron&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/11/1843221&quot;&gt;[via]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77353</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:47:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>asimov</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>dystopianfuture</category>
		<category>fMRI</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>minorityreport</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>orwell</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>teraflop</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;m blue, da boo dee, da boo die...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48688/Im%2Dblue%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddee%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddie</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/"&gt;Blue Gene bears Blue Brain beats Deep Blue.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;q=author%3A%22H+Markram%22&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_yhi=&amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;Dr. Henry Markram&lt;/a&gt; answers questions in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/FAQs.htm&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/rsc.bluegene_cognitive.html&quot;&gt;Neurons  are beautiful&lt;/a&gt;.  Blue Gene/L is now the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.top500.org/lists/2005/11/basic&quot;&gt;fastest supercomputer in the world&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/tts/&quot;&gt;IBM Research&lt;/a&gt; rocks. Deep Blue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/home/html/b.shtml&quot;&gt;beat Kasparov&lt;/a&gt; almost a decade ago. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4071192.stm&quot;&gt;F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4054975&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/308/5729/1738c?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;titleabstract=%22Blue+Brain%22&amp;searchid=1119808194758_2018&amp;stored_search=&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;fdate=10/1/1995&amp;tdate=6/30/2005&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050606/full/435720a.html&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/technology/sciences/2005/06/06/cx_mh_0606ibm.html&quot;&gt;i&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,102288,00.html&quot;&gt;n&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0720_050720_bluebrain.html&quot;&gt;g&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theconnection.org/shows/2005/06/20050613_b_main.asp&quot;&gt;B&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/006973.php&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuroart2006.com/&quot;&gt;u&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuron.yale.edu/neuron/&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brain.cse.unr.edu/ncsDocs/&quot;&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>reflection</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Seductive Solutions for Rough Illnesses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46507/Seductive%2DSolutions%2Dfor%2DRough%2DIllnesses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&amp;amp;doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020392"&gt;Serotonin and Depression: A Disconnect between the Advertisements and the Scientific Literature&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46507</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:43:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>depression</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Science</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38722/Science</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/opinion/18freedman.html?th"&gt;Recent neuroscience research suggests that Democrats and Republicans are not nearly as far apart as they seem (NYT).&lt;/a&gt; Will an awareness that we are conning ourselves to feel alienated from each other help to close the political gap? Or, are we conned by science and the media?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38722</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:00:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>op-ed</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


