<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with research and sex</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/research+sex</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'research' and 'sex' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Marching through the claims like Sherman through Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84740/Marching%2Dthrough%2Dthe%2Dclaims%2Dlike%2DSherman%2Dthrough%2DGeorgia</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/214834&quot; title=&quot;Newsweek article published September 3rd&quot;&gt;Neuroscientist Lise Eliot finds that claims of sex differences fall apart.&lt;/a&gt;  In one study, scientists dressed newborns in gender-neutral clothes and misled adults about their sex. The adults described the &quot;boys&quot; (actually girls) as angry or distressed more often than did adults who thought they were observing girls, and described the &quot;girls&quot; (actually boys) as happy and socially engaged more than adults who knew the babies were boys. Dozens of such disguised-gender experiments have shown that adults perceive baby boys and girls differently, seeing identical behavior through a gender-tinted lens. &quot;Eliot immersed herself in hundreds of scientific papers (her bibliography runs 46 pages). Marching through the claims like Sherman through Georgia, she explains that assertions of innate sex differences in the brain are either &quot;blatantly false,&quot; &quot;cherry-picked from single studies,&quot; or &quot;extrapolated from rodent research&quot; without being confirmed in people. For instance, the idea that the band of fibers connecting the right and left brain is larger in women, supposedly supporting their more &quot;holistic&quot; thinking, is based on a single 1982 study of only 14 brains. Fifty other studies, taken together, found no such sex difference&#8212;not in adults, not in newborns. Other baseless claims: that women are hard-wired to read faces and tone of voice, to defuse conflict, and to form deep friendships; and that &quot;girls&apos; brains are wired for communication and boys&apos; for aggression.&quot; Eliot&apos;s inescapable conclusion: there is &quot;little solid evidence of sex differences in children&apos;s brains.&quot;&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84740</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boys</category>
		<category>Children</category>
		<category>Gender</category>
		<category>Girls</category>
		<category>LiseEliot</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Newsweek</category>
		<category>Research</category>
		<category>Sex</category>
		<dc:creator>cashman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sex like a handshake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65281/Sex%2Dlike%2Da%2Dhandshake</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bonobohandshake.blogspot.com/"&gt;Sex like a handshake&lt;/a&gt; (even &lt;a href=&quot;http://bonobohandshake.blogspot.com/2007/09/bonking-baby-bonobo-study.html&quot;&gt;baby sex&lt;/a&gt;?) Titilation and humor from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanessawoods.net/&quot;&gt;Vanessa Woods&lt;/a&gt;, researcher at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.friendsofbonobos.org/html/sanctuary.htm&quot;&gt;Lola Bonobo&lt;/a&gt; sanctuary. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/63504/Im-a-cold-Italian-pizza-I-could-use-a-lemon-squeezer&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65281</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:48:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apes</category>
		<category>bonobo</category>
		<category>congo</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>imposster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Switching off self-awareness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51068/Switching%2Doff%2Dselfawareness</link>
		<description> Researchers have found that prolonged concentration on a difficult task actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9019-watching-the-brain-switch-off-selfawareness.html&quot;&gt;switches off a person&apos;s self awareness&lt;/a&gt;. Fancy experiencing this sensation for your&lt;i&gt;self&lt;/i&gt;? That would be an oxymoron in existence. Just lay back and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/dn7548&quot;&gt;let the orgasm take hold&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51068</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:16:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>orgasm</category>
		<category>perception</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>37 degrees of separation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39152/37%2Ddegrees%2Dof%2Dseparation</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/chains.htm"&gt;Mapping couplings at a high school&lt;/a&gt; Sociologists graphed the romantic and sexual relationships of 80% of an entire high school (832 out of ~1000 students). The research indicates that high schoolers lack sexual alpha-persons resulting in partner maps that are mostly long lines rather than the more hub and spoke like maps common in adult maps.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39152</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:14:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>graph</category>
		<category>map</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>Mitheral</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Liberation? Perversion? Or a Guy with a</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36051/Liberation%2DPerversion%2DOr%2Da%2DGuy%2Dwith%2Da</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/movies/03crai.html?oref=login&gt;Alfred Kinsey: Liberator or Pervert?&lt;/a&gt;  (New York Times link, I hope you know the drill by now.)  &lt;a href=http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt0362269/&gt;A newish movie&lt;/a&gt; explores the life of &lt;a href=http://www.gayhistory.com/rev2/factfiles/ffkinsey.htm&gt;Alfred Kinsey&lt;/a&gt;, sex researcher and founder of the &lt;a href=http://www.indiana.edu/~kinsey/&gt;Kinsey Institute&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=http://www.indiana.edu/~kinsey/about/photo-tour.html&gt;Kinsey&lt;/a&gt; was author of the controversial book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0253334128/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Sexual Behavior In The Human Male&lt;/a&gt;.  The controversy has blossomed oh these many years later with accusations that Kinsey&apos;s work is &lt;a href=http://www.cwfa.org/kinsey.asp&gt;fraudulent&lt;/a&gt;, and conducive to &lt;a href=http://www.fathersforlife.org/kinsey2.htm&gt;child based porn and fantasy&lt;/a&gt;.  The ultra-right seems obsessed with &lt;a href=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31979&gt;sexualizing his research in terms of &quot;protecting the children&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  His observations have been linked to the &lt;href http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=2618&gt;addictive, destructive nature of pornography, that &lt;a href=http://www.columbian.com/10042004/clark_co/196136.html&gt;twists our notions of sex and love&lt;/a&gt;, and even enables the &lt;a href=http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/2003/reisman/abuse.htm&gt;sexual abuse of college students in class&lt;/a&gt;.  (Yeah, I know, that last sounds kinky, doesn&apos;t it?)&lt;/href&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:33:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>controversy</category>
		<category>kinsey</category>
		<category>movie</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>Wulfgar!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19525/</link>
		<description> According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/GoodMorningAmerica/GMA020827Sex_theories_rodgers.html&quot;&gt;scientists who study sex&lt;/a&gt; we can toss some common misconceptions: there is no battle of the sexes; the Mars and Venus book is misleading; extreme body builders are not sexy; breast size isnt always sexy; men and women cheat equally; the notion of man &quot;spreading his seed&quot; is a cultural invention; thin is not sexy. All thanks to our caveman brain.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19525</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:19:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>stbalbach</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12605/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ecg.media.mit.edu/"&gt;MIT&apos;s Erotic Computation Group.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;By developing advanced sexual appliances and techniques, we seek to broaden the range of human amative expression and heighten our potential for sexual gratification.&quot; Good to see that at least some people are doing research that will benefit all mankind.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12605</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:42:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>EroticComputationGroup</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>MIT</category>
		<category>prank</category>
		<category>pranks</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Eloquence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7267/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010426/od/monogamy_dc_1.html"&gt;Jane Want Relationship, Tarzan Want Sex. &lt;/a&gt; A study seems to confirm what women have long suspected -- women seek security in relationships, while men stick around for the sex.   
&lt;p&gt;
The study says that in most species, monogomy is the top choice when fertility is hidden.  Wonder if they took into account the Pill? ;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7267</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>gender</category>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>relationships</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>jennak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


