<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with results</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/results</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'results' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:48:57 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:48:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>White Dudes Making Web Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65657/White%2DDudes%2DMaking%2DWeb%2DSites</link>
		<description> In April 2007, &lt;a href=&quot;http://alistapart.com/articles/2007surveyresults&quot;&gt;A List Apart and An Event Apart conducted a survey of people who make websites&lt;/a&gt;. Close to 33,000 web professionals answered the survey&#8217;s 37 questions, providing the first data ever collected on the business of web design and development as practiced in the U.S. and worldwide. I thought the demographics data was the most interesting.  The homogeneity of the &quot;web 2.0&quot; crowd comes up often:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/10/what-its-like-at-web-20.html&quot;&gt;What it&apos;s like at Web 2.0&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2006/11/10/we20con2006/&quot;&gt;The Best and the Worst of the Web 2.0 Summit&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a title=&quot;This discusses the audience of these sites.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.drama20show.com/2007/07/02/is-web-20-really-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-part-i/&quot;&gt;Is Web 2.0 Really the Wisdom of the Crowd?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/09/15/the-future-of-white-boy-clubs/&quot;&gt;The Future of White Boy clubs&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65657</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:48:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>census</category>
		<category>data</category>
		<category>demographics</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>results</category>
		<category>standardistas</category>
		<category>survey</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>chunking express</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ads and icons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35720/Ads%2Dand%2Dicons</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/business/media/20adde.html"&gt;The results are in  (NYT - rr).&lt;/a&gt; To follow-up on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/35030&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;, the favorite ad icons and slogans have been chosen, as well as the recipients of the &quot;Stars of Madison Avenue&quot; award.

And I&apos;m sure I speak for everyone when I say...Derek Jeter?!?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35720</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:26:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>AdvertisingWeek</category>
		<category>commercials</category>
		<category>icons</category>
		<category>list</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>NewYork</category>
		<category>NYC</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>results</category>
		<category>slogans</category>
		<dc:creator>braun_richard</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21506/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.votescam.com/frame.html"&gt;Who Counts your Votes? This book published back in 1992 &lt;/a&gt; is a good launching pad  to begin the quest regarding elections and election fraud in America.  Joseph Stalin had a saying: ``Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.&apos;&apos;  When I voted on November 5,  I was handed a little card stuck it in to a Diebold voting machine and presto all the votes I submitted were counted correctly right? Well I&apos;m not sure after I read the article Diebold: The face of modern balloting at http://www.bartcop.com/110702otter.htm
and some of the articles at 
http://www.votefraud.org/.
Perhaps we Americans have handed a bit to much over to computers and the people who own the companies that make the computers and that write the code. Perhaps to restore faith in our Democracy its time to to go back a simple hand counted system, with observers from multiple parties stationed in the local precincts counting the paper ballots.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21506</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2002 00:16:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Diebold</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>machines</category>
		<category>results</category>
		<category>tally</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VoteScam</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4093/</link>
		<description> That&apos;s final projections only, not still-changing exit poll results, which can go in the thread below. (And no, that&apos;s not a link two sentences back.) VNS and the Bush and Gore campaigns have a projection in the presidential race, which is hidden inside to protect the weak. Also, a projection in the New York Senate race.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4093</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2000 15:37:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>results</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/922/</link>
		<description> Oh my, talk about your imperfect applications of technology. I&apos;m searching for an image of one of those &quot;Hello my name is...&quot; badges for a little joke, so I tried out &lt;a href=&quot;http://multimedia.lycos.com/&quot;&gt;Lycos&apos; image search engine&lt;/a&gt;. After about five pages into the search for images containing &quot;hello&quot;, a porn image would pop up on almost every search page. &quot;Hello&quot; is a generic term, so there&apos;s pictures of babies and kids right next to some gnarly stuff. Here&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://multimedia.lycos.com/cgi-bin/search?query=hello&amp;ofor=picture&amp;for=picture&amp;idx=theweb&amp;ff=on&amp;offset=410&quot;&gt;an example&lt;/a&gt; of a kid and a hello kitty image juxtaposed between some interesting images. &lt;a href=&quot;http://multimedia.lycos.com/cgi-bin/search?query=hello&amp;ofor=picture&amp;for=picture&amp;idx=theweb&amp;ff=on&amp;offset=310&quot;&gt;Here&apos;s another&lt;/a&gt;: doll, doll, people screwing each other&apos;s brains out, hello kitty mouse....  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.922</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 20:58:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>imagesearch</category>
		<category>lycos</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>results</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


