<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with rightofreply</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/rightofreply</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'rightofreply' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:30:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:30:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Why Europe doesn&apos;t get the web</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26441/Why%2DEurope%2Ddoesnt%2Dget%2Dthe%2Dweb</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1071-1017333.html"&gt;European right of reply.&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coe.int&quot;&gt;Council of Europe&lt;/a&gt; is drafting a proposal, &lt;em&gt;&quot;... that Internet news organizations, individual Web sites, moderated mailing lists and even Web logs (or &apos;blogs&apos;), must offer a &apos;right of reply&apos; to those who have been criticized by a person or organization.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Considering that &lt;em&gt;someone&lt;/em&gt; will have to pay for the storage and bandwidth required to host  rebuttals, this seem the very antithesis of &quot;free&quot; speech and could get quite expensive.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26441</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>councilofeurope</category>
		<category>eu</category>
		<category>europe</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>rightofreply</category>
		<dc:creator>cedar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


