<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with rights and Technology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/rights+Technology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'rights' and 'Technology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:48:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:48:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The political-economy perspective on women&apos;s rights</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72897/The%2Dpoliticaleconomy%2Dperspective%2Don%2Dwomens%2Drights</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2008/05/womens-rights-w.html"&gt;Women&apos;s rights: What&apos;s in it for men?&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;Women in rich countries largely enjoy gender equality while those in poor countries suffer substantial discrimination. This column proposes an explanation for the relationship between economic development and female empowerment that emphasises changes in the incentives males face rather than shifts in moral sentiment. Technological change that raises demand for human capital may give men a stake in women&apos;s rights.&quot; also see &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2008/05/a-spontaneous-o.html&quot;&gt;A Spontaneous Order: Women and the Invisible Fist&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;blockquote&gt;All of this can happen quite naturally when a large enough minority of men choose to commit widespread, intense, random acts of violence against a large enough number of women. And it can happen quite naturally without the raping men, or the protecting men, or the women in the society ever intending for any particular large-scale social outcome to come about. But what &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; come about, quite naturally, is that women&apos;s social being &#8212; how women appear and act, as women, in public &#8212; will be &lt;i&gt;systematically&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;profoundly&lt;/i&gt; circumscribed by a diffuse, decentralized threat of violence. And, as a natural but unintended consequence of many small, self-interested actions, some vicious and violent (as in the case of men who rape women), some worthwhile in their origins but easily and quickly corrupted (as in the case of men who try to protect women from rape), and some entirely rational responses to an irrational and dangerous situation (as in the case of women who limit their action and seek protection from men), the existence and activities of the police-blotter rapist serve to constrain women&apos;s behavior and to become dependent on some men &#8212; and thus dependent on keeping those men pleased and serving those men&apos;s priorities &#8212; for physical protection from other men. That kind of dependence can just as easily become frustrating and confining for the woman, and that kind of power can just as easily become corrupting and exploitative for the man, as any other form of dependence and power. (Libertarians and anarchists who easily see this dynamic when it comes to government police and military protection of a disarmed populace, shouldn&apos;t have any trouble seeing it, if they are willing to see it, when it comes to male protection of women.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;and btw &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kottke.org/remainder/08/05/15758.html&quot;&gt;a book&lt;/a&gt; penned by a woman who lived with Roma for a time. The bare threads of Roma society are disturbing,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nelsonhancockgallery.com/exhibitions/andrew-miksys.html&quot;&gt;cf&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72897</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Access Denied</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66690/Access%2DDenied</link>
		<description> In the same spirit as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://map.opennet.net/filtering-IT.html&quot;&gt;Open Net Initiative&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.committeetoprotectbloggers.org/&quot;&gt;Committee to Protect Bloggers&lt;/a&gt; that both track global internet filtering, &lt;a href=&quot;http://kitab.nl/&quot;&gt;Sami&lt;/a&gt; ben Gharbia&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/maps/&quot;&gt;Access Denied Map&lt;/a&gt; tries to track the blocking of sites like Blogger, Flickr, YouTube and others by governments, as well as efforts by activists to keep them accessible or to challenge their blockage.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66690</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:17:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anticensorship</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogger</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>flickr</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalist</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>web2.0</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Freedom of Sights and Sounds</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59818/Freedom%2Dof%2DSights%2Dand%2DSounds</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalfreedom.org/&quot; title=&quot;Freedom of Sights and Sounds&quot;&gt;Digital Freedom Campaign&lt;/a&gt; believes that new technologies are essential to the creativity and innovation, and that digital technology enables anyone and everyone to be an artist and an innovator.  The DFC is dedicated to defending the rights of artists, innovators, creators and consumers to use lawful technology free of unreasonable government restrictions and without fear of costly lawsuits.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59818</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>consumers</category>
		<category>digitalrights</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>terrapin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15518/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.digitalconsumer.org/"&gt;DigitalConsumer.org&lt;/a&gt; is trying to get Congress to pass a six-point Consumer Technology Bill of Rights to protect the legitimate rights of honest consumers who buy copyrighted content legally. You can read about the issue and the group in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20020314.html&quot;&gt;Walt Mossberg&apos;s WSJ column&lt;/a&gt;.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15518</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>Consumer</category>
		<category>Copyright</category>
		<category>DigitalConsumer</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Liberty</category>
		<category>Rights</category>
		<category>Technology</category>
		<dc:creator>pmurray63</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12590/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1436-2001Nov22.html"&gt;WE ARE WATCHING YOU. &lt;/a&gt; &quot;The FBI added that its research is &apos;always mindful of constitutional, privacy and commercial equities,&apos; and that its use of new technology can be challenged in court and in Congress.&quot;  No really, go ahead, try and stop us if you don&apos;t like it.  That&apos;s your (snicker, snicker) right.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12590</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2001 09:17:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>program</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>rushmc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


