<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with rights and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/rights+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'rights' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:31:22 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:31:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>China criticizes US on human rights</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79568/China%2Dcriticizes%2DUS%2Don%2Dhuman%2Drights</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/4862553/China-hits-back-at-US-criticism-on-human-rights.html"&gt;China hits back at US criticism on human rights&lt;/a&gt; After the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/631dfda0-0470-11de-845b-000077b07658.html&quot;&gt;US needles China with human rights criticism&lt;/a&gt;, China responds with &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-02/26/content_10904741.htm?loc=interstitialskip&quot;&gt;Human Rights Record of United States in 2008&lt;/a&gt;. From its preface: &quot;As in previous years, the [United States&apos;] reports are full of accusations of the human rights situation in more than 190 countries and regions, including China, but mention nothing of the widespread human rights abuses on its own territory.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79568</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:31:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>shetterly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Padilla</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40081/Padilla</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/02/28/terror/main677099.shtml"&gt;So, what now?&lt;/a&gt; Do &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149129,00.html&quot;&gt;they&lt;/a&gt; charge &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/pow/article/0,8599,262269,00.html&quot;&gt;him?&lt;/a&gt;

He&apos;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chargepadilla.org&quot;&gt;American citizen &lt;/a&gt;who&apos;s spent 2&amp;#0189; years in custody - charged with no crime - without his lawer, access to due process, habeas corpus, etc. 
He has no constitutional safeguards and can be held like that because the president says he can be held like that.
Who says the president has that power? The president does.

Could he &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/07/18/ING427JIH21.DTL&quot;&gt;have even made&lt;/a&gt; a &lt;a href=&quot;href=&quot; http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=jf04koch&quot; &quot;&gt;&quot;dirty bomb?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40081</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Constitution</category>
		<category>JosePadilla</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Padilla</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Volunteers for America!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35368/Volunteers%2Dfor%2DAmerica</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.electionprotection2004.org/"&gt;ElectionProtection&lt;/a&gt; is a clearinghouse for folks who want to be part of the US electoral process.  They&apos;ve already &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/cda/article/print/0,1674,36%257E64%257E2326418,00.htm&quot;&gt;shown their stuff&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citynewsohio.com/News/article/article.asp?NewsID=43146&amp;sID=4&quot;&gt;primary elections&lt;/a&gt;.  They&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news4jax.com/politics/3684028/detail.html&quot;&gt;set to go&lt;/a&gt; in Florida.

The group is a coalition effort of People for the American Way and a bunch of other organizations--some of the usual leftish/centrist suspects (Working Assets, the ACLU, the NAACP), and some rather strange bedfellows (the United Church of Christ, the African American Ministers&apos; Leadership Council).

One hopes that people of all political stripes will be welcomed in this effort to get the vote out and educate people about their rights.  One (well, this one, anyway) hopes as well that those of us who post about our impatience with the US electoral process on MeFi will put our time and/or money where our pixels are.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35368</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:57:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>ElectionProtection</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>volunteers</category>
		<dc:creator>Sidhedevil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Just Cause Law Collective</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35142/Just%2DCause%2DLaw%2DCollective</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lawcollective.org/"&gt;The Just Cause Law Collective&lt;/a&gt; is an excellent resource for outlining what your rights as citizens or non-citizens are within the U.S. in text and illustrations that are understandable by the layperson. It also includes advice on how to survive police encounters and a special section for activists. 

via &lt;a href=http://www.boingboing.net&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35142</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:57:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>activism</category>
		<category>activists</category>
		<category>citizens</category>
		<category>JustCauseLawCollective</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>non-citizens</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>substrate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>speaking of Hunting Season...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31848/speaking%2Dof%2DHunting%2DSeason</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/03/031704fedWorkers.htm"&gt;Every gay and lesbian federal employee has just lost their protection from discrimination.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Gay and lesbians in the entire federal workforce have had their job protections officially removed by the office of Special Counsel. The new Special Counsel, Scott Bloch, says his interpretation of a 1978 law intended to protect employees and job applicants from adverse personnel actions is that gay and lesbian workers are not covered.
Bloch said that the while a gay employee would have no recourse for being fired or demoted for being gay, that same worker could not be fired for attending a gay Pride event.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31848</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:25:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>work</category>
		<category>workplace</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The state wants to watch you have sex...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24625/The%2Dstate%2Dwants%2Dto%2Dwatch%2Dyou%2Dhave%2Dsex</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2080746/"&gt;The Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; is currently hearing arguments about the constitutionality of homosexual sex.  While this may not be news, just listening to some of the comments by the conservatives on the court can be a chilling experience, whether you are straight or gay.

Is it possible that there can be supreme court justices, supposedly the best of the best, who are &lt;i&gt;really &lt;/i&gt;this ignorant?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24625</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:59:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>homosexuality</category>
		<category>lesbian</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>eas98</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Constitution&apos;s 27 Amendments in our daily lives</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21913/The%2DConstitutions%2D27%2DAmendments%2Din%2Dour%2Ddaily%2Dlives</link>
		<description> &#8220;A nation is little more and nothing less than a conversation.  [T]he conversation that is the United States has continued for more than 200 years as a lover&apos;s quarrel between equality and justice.&#8221;  A gallery of ways this &#8220;conversation&#8221; is still taking place in the ways we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postgazette.com/nation/20021127constitutionp3.asp&quot;&gt;live the Constitution&#8217;s 27 Amendments &lt;/a&gt;every day.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21913</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:18:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amendments</category>
		<category>americanhistory</category>
		<category>billofrights</category>
		<category>civics</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>arco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17945/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/2002-06-20/News_and_Views/Beyond_the_City/a-154989.asp&quot;&gt;&quot;It&apos;s not just that you have no right to a lawyer, it&apos;s that you have no right to even have a hearing,&quot; he said. &quot;If that is true, then there is really no limit to the President&apos;s power to label U.S. citizens as bad people and then have them held in military custody indefinitely.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

Okay, someone please tell me that&apos;s not as scary as it sounds.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17945</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2002 07:42:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>donkeyschlong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14653/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/02/10/lesbians.arson.ap/index.html"&gt;Bigots are alive and well in America.&lt;/a&gt; Here we are still fighting for equal rights for all Americans. Some will find this link uplifting because of the outpouring of community support, but to me it&apos;s just another sign of how quickly intolerance turns to attempted murder.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14653</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2002 11:25:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigotry</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>lgbt</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>fleener</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10331/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=14891"&gt;First Amendment advocates fear erosion of rights in aftermath of attacks.&lt;/a&gt; In the aftermath of the worst terrorist attack in America, First Amendment proponents expect and fear that the nation&apos;s heightened national security concerns will soon overpower some of its basic freedoms.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10331</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>constitution</category>
		<category>FirstAmendment</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>tpoh.org</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


