Join 3,433 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

3 posts tagged with rights by 0xFCAF.
Displaying 1 through 3 of 3.

Related tags:
+ (62)
+ (48)
+ (43)
+ (32)
+ (29)
+ (27)
+ (26)
+ (25)
+ (23)
+ (20)
+ (19)
+ (19)
+ (18)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)


Users that often use this tag:
amberglow (29)
zarq (18)
Blazecock Pileon (11)
roomthreeseventeen (5)
The Whelk (5)
Postroad (4)
kliuless (4)
0xFCAF (3)
infini (3)
brownpau (3)
seanyboy (3)
divabat (3)
fourcheesemac (3)
pjern (3)
Sleeper (2)
Artw (2)
nofundy (2)
homunculus (2)
Fiasco da Gama (2)
knave (2)
digaman (2)
plemeljr (2)
Unregistered User (2)
insomnia_lj (2)
Fizz (2)
alms (2)
Morrigan (2)
saucysault (2)
nickyskye (2)
Sidhedevil (2)
lalex (2)

Marriage Equality in Washington State Takes the Next Step

The Washington State Senate has approved SB 6239, a bill granting marriage equality, in a 28-21 vote. It now moves on to the House, where its passage is all but assured, then to the desk of Governor Gregoire, who started the process earlier this year and has promised to sign it.

But, then what? As in 2009, when citizens voted 53-47 in favor of Referendum 71 to reject overturning the legislature's domestic partnership bill, the bill will likely be subject to a citizen referendum, rendering it temporarily inactive until approved by popular vote. A recent poll found that 55% of voters would approve that measure. If that holds true, same-sex marriages could begin in Washington State starting December 7th, 2012.
posted by 0xFCAF on Feb 2, 2012 - 70 comments

To remain silent, simply speak

In a 5-4 decision in the case of Berghuis v. Thompkins, the Supreme Court has ruled that suspects must explicitly assert their right to remain silent under the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona decision. [more inside]
posted by 0xFCAF on Jun 1, 2010 - 156 comments

In Washington State, echoes of Proposition 8

In September of 2004, a Superior Court in Washington state ruled the state's 1998 "Defense of Marriage" act unconstitutional, a ruling which would have allowed the state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. In 2006, the state Supreme Court issued in an opinion in Andersen v. King County overturning the lower court's ruling, noting "that our decision [pdf] is not based on an independent determination of what we believe the law should be." The legislature, in response, created the state-registered domestic partnership in 2007, expanding many (but not all) marriage-related rights to same-sex couples. Last month, a new law expanded the partnership to cover the remaining rights, creating an "all-but-marriage" partnership.

This year, the Washington Values Alliance has filed Referendum 71, which would put this expansion to a ballot vote. The referendum will need 120,000 signatures to make it to the ballot. WhoSigned.org intends to make these signatures searchable. Predictably, this is creating some controversy. [more inside]
posted by 0xFCAF on Jun 2, 2009 - 114 comments

Page: 1