<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with ruddock</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/ruddock</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'ruddock' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:58:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:58:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Australia Card - One Attorney-General Can&apos;t Be Wrong!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48295/Australia%2DCard%2DOne%2DAttorneyGeneral%2DCant%2DBe%2DWrong</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17835986-1702,00.html?from=rss"&gt;Your papers please, komrade.&lt;/a&gt; Australian Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock is now determined to introduce a national ID card. He has gone on the record saying that it&apos;s not a matter of if it will be introduced but what information it will carry and how much it will cost the government. Given that recent &quot;anti-terror&quot; laws were recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/antiterror-laws-rammed-through--minus-debate/2005/12/06/1133829596080.html&quot;&gt;rammed through parliament minus any debate&lt;/a&gt; one can only speculate when this will be rammed through and whether there will be any debate.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48295</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:58:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>identitycard</category>
		<category>ruddock</category>
		<dc:creator>Talez</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


