<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with satellite and astronomy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/satellite+astronomy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'satellite' and 'astronomy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Happy 40th anniversary, mankind.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82966/Happy%2D40th%2Danniversary%2Dmankind</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/110442/WORLD-EXCLUSIVE-NASA-finds-missing-moon-landing-tapes"&gt;Moon Landing Tapes Found!&lt;/a&gt; All the videos you&apos;ve seen of the first moon landing are crap.  Remember, back in the day, video cameras and recorders were two different things.  So it went like this: camera on moon sends footage to Australia, where it&apos;s recorded on tape (and then those tapes were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/561/nasa-loses-moon-landing-tapes&quot;&gt;lost&lt;/a&gt;), then downsized onto a smaller monitor, which is filmed by another video camera, uploaded to satellite, and disseminated around the world.  America watches it on TV, cheers.  Some of this footage is filmed off of a television onto 16mm film. This is what goes into the national archives.  Crap.

So, the original tapes have been found (spoiler: they never left Australia). So what, right? How good could they be, recorded back in the late 60&apos;s and all? Pretty darn good, apparently...seems recording heads were much better than the output available at the time (like playing a Blu-Ray disc on a B&amp;amp;W TV), and several &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/80307/I-could-not-morally-get-rid-of-this-stuff&quot;&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/81321/Thats-no-Moon-Or-a-McDonalds-WTF&quot;&gt;projects&lt;/a&gt; have shown that it&apos;s possible to extract very high resolution data from these old analog tapes.  How hi-rez? &lt;a href=&quot;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081118.html&quot;&gt;High enough to see Neil Armstrong&apos;s nipples get hard.&lt;/a&gt; (be sure to click on that picture)

So when can we see this amazing footage? Probably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1770718/nasa_prepares_to_celebrate_moon_landings.html?cat=15&quot;&gt;soon.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82966</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>earth</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapes</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapesfound</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapeslost</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>NeilArmstrong</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spacetravel</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>sexyrobot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hacking the Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79696/Hacking%2Dthe%2DSky</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0903/0903.0484.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Yup, it&apos;s a PDF.&quot;&gt;Hacking the Sky&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/&quot;&gt;Robert Simpson&lt;/a&gt; writes astronomy tools for use with &lt;a href=&quot;http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/satellite-kml/&quot;&gt;Google Earth&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/02/21/submillimetre-wavelengths-on-google-sky/&quot;&gt;Google Sky&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/over-twitter/&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79696</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:46:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googleearth</category>
		<category>googlesky</category>
		<category>objecttracking</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>satellitetracking</category>
		<category>scuba</category>
		<category>submillimeter</category>
		<category>submillimetre</category>
		<category>submm</category>
		<category>tools</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>twitter</category>
		<dc:creator>Upton O&apos;Good</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>HobbySpace</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67079/HobbySpace</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hobbyspace.com/&quot;&gt;HobbySpace&lt;/a&gt; hosts an exhaustive collection of information and links about space-related hobbies, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hobbyspace.com/Astronomy/index.html&quot; title=&apos;Check out the telescope building section.&apos;&gt;amateur astronomy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hobbyspace.com/SatBuilding/index.html&quot;&gt;satellite design&lt;/a&gt;, and rocketry for both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hobbyspace.com/Rocketry/index.html&quot;&gt;beginners&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hobbyspace.com/Rocketry/rocketry2.html&quot;&gt;experts&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67079</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:22:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amateur</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>hobby</category>
		<category>hobbyist</category>
		<category>hobbyspace</category>
		<category>modelrockets</category>
		<category>rocket</category>
		<category>rocketry</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>telescope</category>
		<dc:creator>Upton O&apos;Good</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Spy Black Satellites</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48770/I%2DSpy%2DBlack%2DSatellites</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.02/spy.html"&gt;I Spy Black Satellites&lt;/a&gt; Amateur satellite spotters can track everything government spymasters blast into orbit. Except the stealth bird codenamed Misty  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48770</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:03:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>satellitespotting</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19921/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2251386.stm"&gt;Earth has a third satellite?&lt;/a&gt; Somehow I missed that a second one, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astro.queensu.ca/~wiegert/3753/3753.html&quot;&gt;Cruithne&lt;/a&gt;, was discovered in 1986.  Is there a size or distance limit to something being considered a satellite?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19921</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:59:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>Cruithne</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>onhazier</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12404/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/satellite.html"&gt;Earth from satellite.&lt;/a&gt;   Something kind of neat for the astronomy geek is us all.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12404</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:15:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>earth</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<dc:creator>goto11</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10710/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cassini/english/"&gt;Cassini&apos;s just outside the orbit of Jupiter.&lt;/a&gt; Where is the space program in all of this?  Have mundane zealots hobbled humanity&apos;s greatest feats to come?  Should we be plotting ourselves to the stars now?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10710</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:24:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>cassini</category>
		<category>jupiter</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4470/</link>
		<description> The World at Night. This amazing &lt;a href=&quot;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg&quot;&gt;image&lt;/a&gt; (warning 500K) is actually a composite of hundreds of pictures made by the orbiting DMSP satellites over regions of the world at night. You can clearly see the Nile river, Hong Kong, Hawaii and probably, if you look close enough, the town you are in right now. From &lt;a href=&quot;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/&quot;&gt;Astronomy Picture of the Day&lt;/a&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4470</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 04:43:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aerial</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>globe</category>
		<category>lights</category>
		<category>photographs</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<dc:creator>lagado</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2612/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap000726.html"&gt;This reminded me of one of the stupidest things I&apos;ve ever seen.&lt;/a&gt; Once on vacation in Eastern Oregon, there was a total eclipse of the moon, just like this one. And some people nearby were taking photographs of it.

&lt;i&gt;Flash&lt;/i&gt; photographs. The round-trip time to the moon at the speed of light is 3 seconds and I wouldn&apos;t even want to calculate the attenuation caused by 320,000 miles of range.

Sometimes it seems as if some people are completely and totally clueless about what they&apos;re doing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2000 21:52:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>APOD</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>LingeringLunarEclipse</category>
		<category>luna</category>
		<category>LunarEclipse</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>photo</category>
		<category>photograph</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


