<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with science and psychology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/science+psychology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'science' and 'psychology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:14:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:14:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Psychological Science?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86161/Psychological%2DScience</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/pspi_9-2.pdf&quot;&gt;&quot;Research has shown that numerous psychological interventions are efficacious, effective, and cost-effective. However, these interventions are used infrequently with patients who would benefit from them, in part because clinical psychologists have not made a convincing case for the use of these interventions ... and because clinical psychologists do not themselves use these interventions even when given the opportunity to do so.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/index.cfm?journal=pspi&amp;content=pspi/home&quot;&gt;Psychological Science in the Public Interest&lt;/a&gt;, psychologists Timothy Baker, Richard McFall, and Varda Shoham argue that clinical psychology needs to embrace its status as a science in order to save itself as a profession.  If that&apos;s too long, Walter Mischel -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/85176/You-see-this-marshmallow-You-dont-have-to-eat-it-You-can-wait-Heres-how&quot;&gt;yes, the marshmallow guy&lt;/a&gt; -- writes an accompanying editorial. : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/pspi_9-2_editorial.pdf&quot;&gt;&quot;The disconnect between much of clinical practice and the advances in psychological science is an unconscionable embarrassment...&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86161</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:14:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baker</category>
		<category>cbt</category>
		<category>clinicalpsychology</category>
		<category>mischel</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>psychotherapy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>therapy</category>
		<dc:creator>escabeche</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Aaron Beck &amp;amp; Cognitive Therapy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85713/Aaron%2DBeck%2Dand%2DCognitive%2DTherapy</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&#8220;&lt;a title=&quot;The Doctor Is IN: At 88, Aaron Beck is now revered for an approach to psychotherapy that pushed Freudian analysis aside&quot; href=&quot;http://www.theamericanscholar.org/the-doctor-is-in/print/&quot;&gt;The psychoanalytic mystique&lt;/a&gt; was overwhelming. It was a little bit like the evangelical movement.&#8221;&lt;/i&gt; How &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beckinstitute.org/Library/InfoManage/Zoom.asp?InfoID=304&amp;RedirectPath=Add1&amp;FolderID=208&amp;SessionID={B73CB695-4937-4965-B3F8-4C7CAB864F33}&amp;InfoGroup=Main&amp;InfoType=Article&amp;SP=2&quot;&gt;Aaron Beck&lt;/a&gt; and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy helped increase empiricism in psychotherapy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85713</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:05:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aaronbeck</category>
		<category>aarontbeck</category>
		<category>behaviorism</category>
		<category>behaviourism</category>
		<category>cbt</category>
		<category>cognition</category>
		<category>cognitivebehavioraltherapy</category>
		<category>discipline</category>
		<category>freud</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>mental</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>psychiatry</category>
		<category>psychoanalysis</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>psychotherapy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>therapy</category>
		<category>wellbeing</category>
		<dc:creator>Non Prosequitur</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wait, wait, I almost have it!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82427/Wait%2Dwait%2DI%2Dalmost%2Dhave%2Dit</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/12/why-do-we-get-tip-of-the-tongue-moments/"&gt;Why do we get &quot;tip of the tongue&quot; moments??&lt;/a&gt; We&#8217;ve all experienced the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tip_of_the_tongue&quot;&gt;tip of the tongue moment&lt;/a&gt; where we wanted to say something but just couldn&#8217;t remember the word. But what causes this momentary lapses in vocabulary?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82427</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:22:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>CaptKyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gleaming the Time Cube</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81858/Gleaming%2Dthe%2DTime%2DCube</link>
		<description> Pascal Boyer explores the field of crackpottery in his article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=435:how-i-found-glaring-errors-in-einsteins-calculations&amp;catid=57:pascals-blog&amp;Itemid=34&quot;&gt;How I found glaring errors in Einstein&apos;s calculations.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;For some time now, I have been an avid reader and collector of webpages created by crackpot physicists, those marginal self-styled scientists whose foundational, generally revolutionary work is sadly ignored by most established scientists. These are the great heroes, at least in their own eyes, of alternative science.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; The featured crackpots include:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/&quot;&gt;The Physics of Bruce Harvey&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/prelim.htm&quot;&gt;PERTINENT INFORMATION&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grandunification.com/&quot;&gt;Grand Unification&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;em&gt;[T]he really interesting crackpots are the ones trying to really, seriously do science, because their productions and their failures tells us important things about science itself. Most of my &#8220;informants&#8221; are committed to the standard scientific way of doing things. They accept that their theories should be coherent, clearly expressed, grounded in explicit mathematics, consistent with the evidence, compatible with other established (and empirically grounded) frameworks, etc. They accept that theories should be discussed, tested, and discarded if they are redundant or trivial.&lt;/em&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81858</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:16:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>crackpots</category>
		<category>pascalboyer</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Stole the Precious Thing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>X-Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79706/XPhi</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10638"&gt;Philosophy&#8217;s great experiment.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Philosophers used to combine conceptual reflections with practical experiment. The trendiest new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/~knobe/ExperimentalPhilosophy.html&quot;&gt;branch&lt;/a&gt; of the discipline, known as &lt;a href=&quot;http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;x-phi&lt;/a&gt;, wants to return to those days. Some philosophers don&#8217;t like it.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79706</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AppliedEthics</category>
		<category>Determinism</category>
		<category>Dualism</category>
		<category>Empiricism</category>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>ExperimentalPhilosophy</category>
		<category>FreeWill</category>
		<category>Intuition</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>TrolleyOlogy</category>
		<category>XPhi</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Our whole approach is based on the idea that science matters at the FDA&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77780/Our%2Dwhole%2Dapproach%2Dis%2Dbased%2Don%2Dthe%2Didea%2Dthat%2Dscience%2Dmatters%2Dat%2Dthe%2DFDA</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12792611"&gt;The Economist on Drugs&lt;/a&gt; -- Scientists in North America, Europe and Israel are studying the use of MDMA, LSD, hallucinogenic mushrooms, marijuana and other banned psychoactive substances in treating conditions such as anxiety, cluster headaches, addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorder. They are supported by private funds from a handful of organisations: the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beckleyfoundation.org/&quot;&gt;Beckley Foundation&lt;/a&gt; in Britain; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heffter.org/&quot;&gt;Heffter Research Institute&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maps.org/&quot;&gt;Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies&lt;/a&gt; (MAPS) in America. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/77257/Society-upto-speed&quot;&gt;related&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77780</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:50:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>ecstasy</category>
		<category>entheogens</category>
		<category>hallucinogenics</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>MDMA</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>neurobiology</category>
		<category>psychedelics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>PTSD</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Neural Correlates of Hate</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76084/Neural%2DCorrelates%2Dof%2DHate</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081028205658.htm"&gt;Brain&apos;s &apos;Hate Circuit&apos; Identified.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;People who view pictures of someone they hate display activity in distinct areas of the brain that, together, may be thought of as a &apos;hate circuit&apos;, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0003556&quot;&gt;new research by scientists at UCL&lt;/a&gt; (University College London).&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76084</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:21:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Emotion</category>
		<category>Hatred</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Contain Multitudes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75965/I%2DContain%2DMultitudes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200811/multiple-personalities"&gt;First Person Plural.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;An evolving approach to the science of pleasure suggests that each of us contains multiple selves&#8212;all with different desires, and all fighting for control. If this is right, the pursuit of happiness becomes even trickier. Can one self bind another self if the two want different things? Are you always better off when a Good Self wins? And should outsiders, such as employers and policy makers, get into the fray?&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://buddhism.about.com/b/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75965</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Ego</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Personality</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Pleasure</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Self</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lacking Control Increases Magical Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75411/Lacking%2DControl%2DIncreases%2DMagical%2DThinking</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/200810/of-jock-straps-and-conspiracy-theories"&gt;Of Jock Straps and Conspiracy Theories.&lt;/a&gt; A new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/6366664/Lacking-Control-Increases-Illusory-Pattern-Perception&quot;&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; looks at how lacking control &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=20080225-000003&quot;&gt;increases the tendency for magical thinking&lt;/a&gt; and illusory pattern perception. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/10/feeling_out_of_contr.html&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75411</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:20:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Control</category>
		<category>Illusion</category>
		<category>MagicalThinking</category>
		<category>Perception</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservatives are scaredy-cats</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75044/Conservatives%2Dare%2Dscaredycats</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sciencenow;2008/918/2&quot;&gt;The Politics of Fear&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=112246&amp;org=NSF&quot;&gt;Some Political Views May be Related to Physiology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/politics.swf&quot;&gt;video&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsfgov.httpsvc.vitalstreamcdn.com/nsfgov_vitalstream_com/podcast/hibbing.mp3&quot;&gt;audio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; news stories - &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7623256.stm&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;British Broadcasting Corporation&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080919/NEWS03/809190354/1022/LIVING02&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94764491&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;National Public Radio&quot;&gt;NPR&lt;/acronym&gt; with audio&lt;/a&gt;

Plus, a 2006 lecture on the heritability of political attitudes by John Hibbing, one of the authors of the above study - &lt;a href=&quot;http://videocast.com/episode/19080427/&quot;&gt;flash video&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unl.edu/unlpub/podcasts/videofiles/HibbingsNebraskaLecture.m4v&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;Moving Picture Experts Group&quot;&gt;MPEG&lt;/acronym&gt;4 download&lt;/a&gt;, starts at around 10:00 and runs for about an hour  (during the intro &lt;acronym title=&quot;by the way&quot;&gt;btw&lt;/acronym&gt; he quips &quot;I&apos;m a social scientist pretending to be a scientist...&quot;) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75044</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 15:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>fear</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>physiology</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>XMLicious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Didn&apos;t Know That</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73916/I%2DDidnt%2DKnow%2DThat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sciencehack.com/"&gt;Science Hack&lt;/a&gt; is a unique search engine for science videos focusing on Physics, Chemistry, and Space. For example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/sf_Qehx2pnE&quot;&gt;things&lt;/a&gt; to do with &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/mb3ktPn1MQk&quot;&gt;sulfur hexafluoride&lt;/a&gt;. Still growing, the editors are presently indexing other scientific fields of study including Geology, Psychology, Robotics and Computers. Ever wonder &lt;a href=&quot;http://sciencehack.com/videos/view/AGVJ2GVR9pk&quot;&gt;why things go bang&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73916</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:11:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chemistry</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>geology</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>robotics</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>videos</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Behind Door Number One...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70648/Behind%2DDoor%2DNumber%2DOne</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/science/08tier.html?ex=1365307200&amp;en=dc270baec0c66ed7&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;The Monty Hall Problem has struck again&lt;/a&gt;, and this time it&#8217;s not merely embarrassing mathematicians. If the calculations of a Yale economist are correct, there&#8217;s a sneaky logical fallacy in some of the most famous experiments in psychology.&quot; The NY Times&apos; John Tierney reports on new research into &lt;a href=&quot;http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/monty-hall-meets-cognitive-dissonance/&quot;&gt;cognitive dissonance as examined through the famous Monty Hall Problem&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[A previous MetaFilter thread about the Monty Hall Problem: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/34449/Lets-Make-a-Deal&quot;&gt;Let&apos;s Make A Deal!&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70648</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:10:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cognitivedissonance</category>
		<category>gametheory</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>montyhall</category>
		<category>montyhallproblem</category>
		<category>probability</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Encephalon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69204/Encephalon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/02/18/encephalon-briefing-the-next-us-president-on-23-neuroscience-and-psychology-issues/"&gt;Encephalon: Briefing the Next US President on 24 Neuroscience and Psychology Issues.&lt;/a&gt; Encephalon, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/encephalon/&quot;&gt;neuroscience blog carnival&lt;/a&gt; has returned after a brief hiatus and is being hosted at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/&quot;&gt;Sharp Brains&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/02/encephalon_the_new_.html&quot;&gt;Mind Hacks&lt;/a&gt;, which will host the next edition.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69204</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:25:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blogs</category>
		<category>Encephalon</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pop Psychology: Type A / Type B Personalities</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69018/Pop%2DPsychology%2DType%2DA%2DType%2DB%2DPersonalities</link>
		<description> Are you a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_a_personality&quot;&gt;Type A &lt;/a&gt;personality or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_B_personality&quot;&gt;Type B&lt;/a&gt; personality?  There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.psych.uncc.edu/pagoolka/TypeA-B-intro.html&quot;&gt;lots &lt;/a&gt;of &lt;a href=&quot;http://discoveryhealth.queendom.com/type_a_personality_access.html&quot;&gt;tests &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.queendom.com/tests/access_page/index.htm?idRegTest=732&quot;&gt;online &lt;/a&gt;to find out.

Type A and B personality descriptions always remind me of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://painting.about.com/library/blpaint/blrightbraintable.htm&quot;&gt;supposed left brain / right brain differences, &lt;/a&gt; but according to the Wiki, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralization_of_brain_function&quot;&gt;the differences between right and left brain are not so simple.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69018</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>kdern</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Theory of Humor | Why something is funny, why it sometimes is not, and when it crosses a line.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66719/A%2DTheory%2Dof%2DHumor%2DWhy%2Dsomething%2Dis%2Dfunny%2Dwhy%2Dit%2Dsometimes%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dand%2Dwhen%2Dit%2Dcrosses%2Da%2Dline</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/humor.html"&gt;Theory of Humor.&lt;/a&gt; A scientific paper, written by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/&quot;&gt;Tom Veatch&lt;/a&gt;, describes his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/humor.html&quot;&gt;Theory of Humor&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node2.html&quot;&gt;When is something funny&lt;/a&gt;? When is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node5.html&quot;&gt;not funny&lt;/a&gt;? When does it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node3.html&quot;&gt;cross the line&lt;/a&gt;? Why are puns &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node29.html&quot;&gt;generally shitty&lt;/a&gt;? And the mysterious and magical powers elephant jokes have on children, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node24.html&quot;&gt;revealed&lt;/a&gt;!

A great data set to use for practice in applying the theories presented in the paper can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15281/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66719</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:48:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>funny</category>
		<category>gag</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>joke</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>laughter</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>pun</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>People who play gnomes are more likely to be annoying in real life.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64366/People%2Dwho%2Dplay%2Dgnomes%2Dare%2Dmore%2Dlikely%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dannoying%2Din%2Dreal%2Dlife</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus"&gt;Nick Yee&apos;s Daedalus Project&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/54454&quot;&gt;touched &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/52501&quot;&gt;on &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46847&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/small&gt; is dedicated to the study of human behaviour in MMOs. His recent dissertation names &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/001569.php&quot;&gt;The Proteus Effect&lt;/a&gt;&quot;: a correlation between MMO characters&apos; appearances, and their players&apos; behaviors.  &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickyee.com/pubs/Dissertation_Nick_Yee.pdf&quot;&gt;In the final study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(pdf)&lt;/small&gt;, I showed that the Proteus Effect persists outside of the virtual environment. Placing someone in a taller avatar changes how they consequently negotiate in a face-to-face setting.&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/arch_cat.php&quot;&gt;His archives&lt;/a&gt; cover a lot of ground, and current MMO players can help by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickyee.com/mmorpg/&quot;&gt;taking the survey&lt;/a&gt;.  For a little lighter reading, refer to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/001543.php?page=1&quot;&gt;his critique&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_addiction#_note-1&quot;&gt;Internet Addiction Disorder&lt;/a&gt;, a &quot;condition&quot; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/supportgp.html&quot;&gt;started as a joke&lt;/a&gt;, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://psychcentral.com/news/2007/06/26/video-games-no-addiction-for-now/&quot;&gt;almost made it&lt;/a&gt; into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dsm5.org/&quot;&gt;DSM-V&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64366</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:57:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academic</category>
		<category>blizzard</category>
		<category>MMORPG</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>worldofwarcraft</category>
		<dc:creator>mek</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Art of Psychiatry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57737/The%2DArt%2Dof%2DPsychiatry</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050103fa_fact?050103fa_fact"&gt;Dictionary of Disorder&lt;/a&gt; - shaping the DSM  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57737</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>diagnosis</category>
		<category>DSM</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>mentalhealth</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>psychiatry</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This just in: Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55550/This%2Djust%2Din%2DPsilocybin%2Dcan%2Doccasion%2Dmysticaltype%2Dexperiences%2Dhaving%2Dsubstantial%2Dand%2Dsustained%2Dpersonal%2Dmeaning%2Dand%2Dspiritual%2Dsignificance</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;...&lt;em&gt;Objectives&lt;/em&gt; &amp;#0160; &amp;#0160;This double-blind study evaluated the acute and longer-term psychological effects of a high dose of psilocybin relative to a comparison compound administered under comfortable, supportive conditions...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Results&lt;/em&gt; &amp;#0160; &amp;#0160;Psilocybin produced a range of acute perceptual changes, subjective experiences, and labile moods including anxiety. Psilocybin also increased measures of mystical experience. At 2 months, the volunteers rated the psilocybin experience as having substantial personal meaning and spiritual significance and attributed to the experience sustained positive changes in attitudes and behavior consistent with changes rated by community observers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 
&lt;em&gt;Conclusions&lt;/em&gt;  &amp;#0160;&amp;#0160;When administered under supportive conditions, psilocybin occasioned experiences similar to spontaneously occurring mystical experiences. The ability to occasion such experiences prospectively will allow rigorous scientific investigations of their causes and consequences.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.springerlink.com/content/v2175688r1w4862x/fulltext.html&quot; title=&quot;The present study advances the empirical analysis of mystical experience. From a scientific perspective, most of what is known about mystical or religious experience is based on descriptive characterization of spontaneously occurring experience. Rigorous attempts to prospectively experimentally manipulate such experiences have generally been associated with only modest effects...&quot;&gt;Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55550</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:11:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>...</category>
		<category>duh</category>
		<category>experience</category>
		<category>mystical</category>
		<category>psilocybin.</category>
		<category>psychedelic</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>well</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Coming soon to a cinema near you</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53215/Coming%2Dsoon%2Dto%2Da%2Dcinema%2Dnear%2Dyou</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.media.mit.edu/press/speechome/"&gt;The Human Speechome Project&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;A baby is to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn9167-watch-language-grow-in-the-baby-brother-house.html&quot;&gt;monitored&lt;/a&gt; by a network of microphones and video cameras for 14 hours a day, 365 days a year, in an effort to unravel the seemingly miraculous process by which children acquire language.&quot;. Selected video &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.media.mit.edu/~decamp/timelapse/web/&quot;&gt;clips&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.media.mit.edu/press/speechome/speechome-cogsci.pdf&quot;&gt;Paper&lt;/a&gt; (PDF, 750KB). To test hypotheses of how children learn, Prof Deb Roy&apos;s team at MIT will develop machine learning systems that &#8220;step into the shoes&#8221; of his son by processing the sights and sounds of three years of life at home. Total storage required: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/051606-mit-ip-san.html&quot;&gt;1.4 petabytes&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53215</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>speech</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Burying Freud</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51616/Burying%2DFreud</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.human-nature.com/freud/tallis.html"&gt;Burying Freud.&lt;/a&gt; A collection of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.human-nature.com/freud/index.html&quot;&gt;essays and responses&lt;/a&gt; by and about Freud&apos;s harshest critics, including &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.human-nature.com/freud/crews.html&quot;&gt;Confessions of a Freud-Basher&lt;/a&gt;&quot; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9901/reviews/oakes.html&quot;&gt;anti-Freud&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://human-nature.com/articles/crews.html&quot;&gt;point man&lt;/a&gt; Frederick Crews, interviewed at length &lt;a href=&quot;http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Crews/crews-con0.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51616</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 09:16:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anti-freud</category>
		<category>frederickcrews</category>
		<category>freud</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;well, it breaks the ice, doesn&apos;t it&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46443/well%2Dit%2Dbreaks%2Dthe%2Dice%2Ddoesnt%2Dit</link>
		<description> Having sweated over the origins of the universe and split the atom, academics have finally tackled the question that has perplexed mankind since the dawn of time: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article325167.ece&quot;&gt;what are the best chat-up lines?&lt;/a&gt; A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6V9F-4HC76VB-1&amp;_coverDate=10%2F19%2F2005&amp;_alid=331830970&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_qd=1&amp;_cdi=5897&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=5667373c333a4e39839e137903e6c8ad&quot;&gt;study from psychologists at the University of Edinburgh&lt;/a&gt; tested 205 people for reactions to 40 vignettes of a woman approached by a man using &quot;verbal signals of genetic quality&quot; in different &lt;a href=&quot;http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2005/10/science-of-chat-up-lines.html&quot;&gt;categories&lt;/a&gt;, and found the best rated approaches to be those revealing character qualities, wealth and culture, although the puzzling winning line proved a flop in real life tests. Unsurprisingly, a direct request for sex received a low score. Previous findings by the Japanese proved &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.scotsman.com/opinion.cfm?id=1264362004&quot;&gt;equally dubious&lt;/a&gt;. But there&apos;s still hope, as the code seems to have been cracked &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1604620,00.html&quot;&gt;in Dublin, where since last year &quot;there is definitely more pulling&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. The secret? A smoking ban, a lot of crowded pubs, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smirting&quot;&gt;&quot;smirting&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, an unexpected side effect of the health measure.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46443</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:19:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dublin</category>
		<category>evolutionarypsychology</category>
		<category>fun</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<dc:creator>funambulist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Metafilter: Best of the Web??</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45701/Metafilter%2DBest%2Dof%2Dthe%2DWeb</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1815107,00.html&quot;&gt;Research&lt;/a&gt; by dumb, ignorant Yankees on national &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9598717/&quot;&gt;stereotypes&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45701</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:16:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>nationality</category>
		<category>people</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>stereotypes</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Vagaries of Religious Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45536/The%2DVagaries%2Dof%2DReligious%2DExperience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://edge.org/3rd_culture/gilbert05/gilbert05_index.html"&gt;Is God nothing more than an attempt to explain order and good fortune&lt;/a&gt; by those who do not understand the mathematics of chance, the principles of self-organizing systems, or the psychology of the human mind? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Gilbert&quot;&gt;Daniel Gilbert&lt;/a&gt;, a professor of Psychology and head of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dtg/gilbert.htm&quot;&gt;Social Cognition and Emotion Laboratory&lt;/a&gt; at Harvard, discusses his latest research and soon to be published study about the vagaries of religious experience.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45536</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:07:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>God</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>pmbuko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Not getting symbolism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44382/Not%2Dgetting%2Dsymbolism</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=000ACE3F-007E-12DC-807E83414B7F0000"&gt;&quot;Almost half the children committed one or more of these mistakes.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;They attempted with apparent seriousness to perform the same actions with the miniature items that they had with the large ones. Some sat down on the little chair: they walked up to it, turned around, bent their knees and lowered themselves onto it. Some simply perched on top, others sat down so hard that the chair skittered out from under them. Some children sat on the miniature slide and tried to ride down it, usually falling off in the process; others attempted to climb the steps, causing the slide to tip over.&lt;/small&gt; (With the chair and slide made of sturdy plastic and only about five inches tall, the toddlers faced no danger of hurting themselves.)&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44382</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:23:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>child</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>sciam</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scientificamerican</category>
		<category>semiotics</category>
		<category>symbolism</category>
		<category>symbols</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You have evolved to like this interview.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43253/You%2Dhave%2Devolved%2Dto%2Dlike%2Dthis%2Dinterview</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&amp;amp;articleID=00022EBD-51CA-12C4-91CA83414B7F0000&amp;amp;ref=rdf"&gt;The fitness of evolutionary psychology&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43253</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>evolutionarypsychology</category>
		<category>nature</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>teleology</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


