<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with search and advertising</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/search+advertising</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'search' and 'advertising' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2002 08:45:27 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2002 08:45:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15942/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.com"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; has quietly changed its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/r/pv&quot;&gt;privacy policy&lt;/a&gt;.  Accountholders are now subscribed to lots of newsletters plus junk mail and telemarketing.  You can change your &lt;a href=&quot;http://subscribe.yahoo.com/showaccount&quot;&gt;preferences&lt;/a&gt; and send Yahoo some &lt;a href=&quot;http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/privacy/cgi_feedback?radio30=radio305&quot;&gt;feedback&lt;/a&gt;.  You can&apos;t prevent them from subscribing you to new products without closing your account.  Will going to an opt-out system help or hurt their bottom line?  Will there be a backlash?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15942</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2002 08:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>optout</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>neuroshred</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14453/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/02/04/search.engine.lawsuit.idg/index.html"&gt;Search engines sued over pay-for-placement.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The maker of a popular weight-loss system filed suit against four search engines this week, alleging that their policy of letting advertisers pay to appear in top-ranked search results violated federal and state trademark and fair-competition laws.&quot; [from CNN]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14453</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 12:05:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>cnn</category>
		<category>keywords</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9482/</link>
		<description> Interesting sellout. &lt;a href=&quot;http://about.com/&quot;&gt;About.com&lt;/a&gt; has changed the &quot;o&quot; in their name to a Life Saver throughout the site. That&apos;s some desperate advertising.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9482</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 14:26:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>about.com</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<dc:creator>endquote</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5091/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginewatch.com/sereport/00/11-inclusion.html&quot;&gt;Where are search engines headed?&lt;/a&gt; Paid inclusion seems to be an increasingly popular strategy among search engines and directories. In addition to Yahoo and the ones listed in the article, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginewatch.com/sereport/01/01-go.html&quot;&gt;Go.com&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginewatch.com/sereport/01/01-nbci.html&quot;&gt;NBCi&lt;/a&gt; have recently implemented paid inclusion systems. Should we expect even more search engines to head in this direction? Does this worry anyone?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5091</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2001 12:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>go.com</category>
		<category>nbci</category>
		<category>paid</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>Aaaugh!</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1521/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; appears to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/doodle.html&quot;&gt;telling a story&lt;/a&gt; with their logo. Is this a fun and creative way to &quot;extend their brand&quot; (as the marcom kids like to say) or do they need to stop letting their engineers handle their logo design?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1521</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 07:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>logo</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<dc:creator>jkottke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


