<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with searchengines and internet</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/searchengines+internet</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'searchengines' and 'internet' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:37:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:37:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Google Search Engine Ranking Factors v2</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74223/Google%2DSearch%2DEngine%2DRanking%2DFactors%2Dv2</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors"&gt;Google Search Engine Ranking Factors v2&lt;/a&gt; &quot;represents the collective wisdom of 37 leaders in the world of organic search engine optimization. Together, they have voted on the various factors that are estimated to comprise Google&apos;s ranking algorithm.&quot; The highest ranked factor is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#f3&quot;&gt;Keyword Use in Title Tag.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74223</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>Soup</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Search Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36935/Search%2DWars</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4003193.stm"&gt;Search Wars&lt;/a&gt; The BBC reviews five search engines, including Google and the new MSN beta  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36935</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:34:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>websearches</category>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fishing for Information? Try Better Bait</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27796/Fishing%2Dfor%2DInformation%2DTry%2DBetter%2DBait</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/21/technology/circuits/21basi.html"&gt;Fishing for Information? Try Better Bait.&lt;/a&gt; [NYT] It&apos;s nice to see the NY Times take a stab at helping normal folk become better at searching the web. They point to Gary Price&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resourceshelf.com&quot;&gt;resourceshelf.com&lt;/a&gt;, Greg R. Notess&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineshowdown.com&quot;&gt;searchengineshowdown.com&lt;/a&gt; and Danny Sullivan&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://searchenginewatch.com&quot;&gt;searchenginewatch.com&lt;/a&gt; and Tara Calishain&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://researchbuzz.com&quot;&gt;researchbuzz.com&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;It&apos;s just nice to see a story that&apos;s not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=13100896&quot;&gt;All&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://silicon.com/news/500019/1/5702.html&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/business/articles/timid66882?source=&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; for a change. Somewhat related articles: One over at O&apos;Reilly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/08/21/better_search_engine.html&quot;&gt;On How To Build Your Own&lt;/a&gt;, and one at &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5064913.html&quot;&gt;CNET&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nutch.org/docs/index.html&quot;&gt;Nutch&lt;/a&gt;, an open-source web search engine.
&lt;br&gt;Anyone have any favorite search engine tricks to share?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27796</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 05:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>engines</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>NYtimes</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This just in! Search Engines help find people, too!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24263/This%2Djust%2Din%2DSearch%2DEngines%2Dhelp%2Dfind%2Dpeople%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;ncid=582&amp;amp;e=1&amp;amp;cid=582&amp;amp;u=/nm/20030313/wr_nm/column_livewire_dc"&gt;This just in! Search Engines help find people, too!&lt;/a&gt; Reuters has apparently just figured out that you can &lt;a href=http://www.google.com/&gt;google&lt;/a&gt; up old acquaintances. As for myself, I find that google has become less useful than &lt;a href=http://www.alltheweb.com/&gt;these guys&lt;/a&gt; for people-searches. So, what is the most obscure thing/person you have searched for, and how did you find it?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24263</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:07:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>ilsa</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17286/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://labs.google.com/"&gt;Google Labs&lt;/a&gt;  is a public beta testing area for some pretty cool things they are currently working on: an amazing glossary, voice search by telephone, search results navigated without the mouse and finding additional items to sets defined by words you enter.&lt;br&gt;
With every new feature, they seem to be getting even further beyond the competition. Even though Google is very likable company: is a monopoly on web search a good thing?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17286</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 14:06:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>betatesting</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googlelabs</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>websearch</category>
		<category>www</category>
		<dc:creator>c3o</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4922/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www0.mercurycenter.com/svtech/columns/front/docs/dp122400.htm"&gt;At 21,000 gigabytes of HTML, the web isn&apos;t all that large. (?)&lt;/a&gt;  Is there &lt;u&gt;anything&lt;/u&gt; which you &lt;u&gt;can&apos;t&lt;/u&gt; find somewhere on the web? &lt;a href=&quot;http://dir.yahoo.com/Recreation/Hobbies/Rockets/Potato_Cannons/&quot;&gt;An entire Yahoo category for Potato cannons?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4922</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:27:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>potatocannons</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3709/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://uk.google.yahoo.com/bin/query_uk?p=doctor%27s+surgery+webpage&amp;amp;hc=0&amp;amp;hs=0"&gt;Somebody found my blog while searching for a &apos;doctor&apos;s surgery webpage&apos;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.altavista.com&quot;&gt;AltaVista&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.lycos.co.uk&quot;&gt;Lycos&lt;/a&gt; -- has anyone ever found anything
useful from any search engine ever? Really? I don&apos;t believe you. Never ever
has any search engine -- not even lovely, nifty little &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; -- given me what I want in any
useful way whatsoever. You would not believe how long it took me to find a
sodding picture of &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.williamclaxton.com/ASP/displayimage.asp?imageid=153&quot;&gt;Steve
McQueen smoking&lt;/a&gt; the other day.
And for God&apos;s sake don&apos;t get me onto the &lt;i&gt;utterly&lt;/i&gt; pointless &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.altavista.co.uk&quot;&gt;localised&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.yahoo.com&quot;&gt;versions&lt;/a&gt; or the abyssmal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?pg=q&amp;stype=simage&quot;&gt;AltaVista picture search&lt;/a&gt;.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3709</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2000 05:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>James Bachman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3567/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/"&gt;Yahoo! Buzz&lt;/a&gt; See what everyone on Yahoo is looking for (excluding porn)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3567</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 17:51:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


