<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with searchengines and privacy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/searchengines+privacy</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'searchengines' and 'privacy' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:19:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:19:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Nationalise Google?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25089/Nationalise%2DGoogle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2786761.stm"&gt;Nationalise Google?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Perhaps the time has come to recognise this dominant search engine for what it is - a public utility that must be regulated in the public interest.&quot; Bill Thompson from the BBC tells me that Google puts a cookie on my computer that can&apos;t be deleted till 2038: &quot;This means that Google builds up a detailed profile of your search terms over many years. Google probably knew when you last thought you were pregnant, what diseases your children have had, and who your divorce lawyer is. It refuses to say why it wants this information or to admit whether it makes it available to the US Government for tracking purposes.&quot; Are they &quot;a secretive, hyper-competitive company with no respect for the personal privacy of its users&quot;? Are other search engines better behaved? And is this the beginning of &lt;b&gt;search ethics&lt;/b&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25089</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:19:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>theplayethic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12630/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-202-7946411.html"&gt;Did Google go too far &lt;/a&gt;  when they added a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/advanced_search&quot;&gt;new
tool&lt;/a&gt; to their website, or are webmasters to blame for lax security?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12630</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:51:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>webcrawling</category>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8418/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rwjm.com/"&gt;I can&apos;t put a serious link up because I don&apos;t wanna link it. . .&lt;/a&gt; I don&apos;t like the fact that if you have your address and number listed in the phone book, suddenly now if someone enters your name into Google along with the city you presumably live in:

Your address and phone number come up.  

I use no other search engines, but I would presume the same happens there.  These aren&apos;t the days of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aarp.org/comptech/features/feature034.html&quot;&gt;PENNSYLVANIA-65000 anymore Harrietta.&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8418</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2001 03:18:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>addresses</category>
		<category>phonenumbers</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/705/</link>
		<description> If you use &lt;a href=&quot;http://jump.altavista.com/ch_yp&quot;&gt;AltaVista&apos;s yellowpage listings&lt;/a&gt;, you may be letting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alexa.com/&quot;&gt;Alexa&lt;/a&gt; know &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,9599,00.html&quot;&gt;exactly where you live, where you&apos;re planning on flying, and who you talk to on the phone&lt;/a&gt;. This is so far beyond a simple breach of privacy. This is insane.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.705</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 14:26:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Alexa</category>
		<category>AltaVista</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>yellowpages</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


