Related tags:
brokenlink + (63)
privacy + (58)
terrorism + (58)
Computers + (45)
hacking + (41)
Internet + (39)
tsa + (39)
Hackers + (34)
Microsoft + (32)
Airport + (31)
politics + (24)
technology + (23)
airlines + (18)
surveillance + (18)
fbi + (17)
bush + (17)
airports + (17)
government + (17)
nsa + (17)
software + (17)
homelandsecurity + (16)
usa + (16)
virus + (16)
securitytheater + (15)
9-11 + (14)
travel + (14)
windows + (14)
terror + (13)
war + (13)
hacker + (12)
linux + (12)
computer + (11)
911 + (11)
email + (11)
homeland + (11)
password + (11)
passwords + (11)
schneier + (11)
Wired + (11)
fraud + (10)
crime + (10)
encryption + (10)
airplanes + (10)
cracking + (10)
Malware + (10)
BruceSchneier + (9)
science + (9)
UK + (9)
US + (9)
web + (9)
worm + (9)
dhs + (8)
espionage + (8)
bigbrother + (8)
China + (8)
Freedom + (8)
hack + (8)
IE + (8)
Law + (8)
lulzsec + (8)


Users that often use this tag:
homunculus (19)
mathowie (15)
Postroad (10)
Steven Den Beste (7)
scalefree (7)
jeffburdges (6)
zarq (6)
skallas (5)
tranquileye (5)
digaman (5)
amberglow (5)
vidur (5)
fenriq (4)
Artw (4)
unSane (4)
Blazecock Pileon (4)
crunchland (4)
kliuless (4)
Irontom (4)
These Premises Are... (4)
baylink (3)
netbros (3)
thescoop (3)
bkdelong (3)
ed (3)
semmi (3)
DBAPaul (3)
rzklkng (3)
chunking express (3)
dejah420 (3)
Unregistered User (3)
Foci for Analysis (3)
Abiezer (3)
the man of twists ... (3)
Wordshore (3)
Bovine Love (2)
Afroblanco (2)
russilwvong (2)
Malor (2)
infini (2)
orange swan (2)
Nelson (2)
XQUZYPHYR (2)
omidius (2)
Ignatius J. Reilly (2)
specialk420 (2)
daHIFI (2)
laz-e-boy (2)
y2karl (2)
tommasz (2)
mrgrimm (2)
trioperative (2)
fold_and_mutilate (2)
srboisvert (2)
feelinglistless (2)
arnab (2)
insomnia_lj (2)
mecawilson (2)
idiolect (2)
Hackworth (2)

Our results open a fascinating new direction for position-based security in cryptography where security of protocols is solely based on the laws of physics and proofs of security do not require any pre-existing infrastructure.
posted by Joe Beese on Aug 8, 2010 - 47 comments

Beyond even the outrageously broad "state secrets" privilege invented by the Bush administration and now embraced fully by the Obama administration, the Obama DOJ has now invented a brand new claim of government immunity, one which literally asserts that the U.S. Government is free to intercept all of your communications (calls, emails and the like) and -- even if what they're doing is blatantly illegal and they know it's illegal -- you are barred from suing them unless they "willfully disclose" to the public what they have learned. - Glenn Greenwald. [more inside]
posted by Joe Beese on Apr 7, 2009 - 102 comments