<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sellout</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sellout</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sellout' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:14:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:14:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Selling out</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65598/Selling%2Dout</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2007/sellout-songs/"&gt;The Moby Quotient&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;[I]n the late 1990s, the techno artist Moby, as hip as they come, openly boasted of having sold every track of his breakthrough album &quot;Play&quot; to an advertiser, or to a film or TV soundtrack. The album should perhaps have been called &quot;Pay.&quot;  &lt;/em&gt;  In homage Bill Wyman of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hitsville.org/&quot;&gt;Hitsville&lt;/a&gt; has dubbed his formula for determining the offensiveness of a rock-based advertisement. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2007/sellout-songs/&quot;&gt;accompanying article&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65598</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:14:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>Moby</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<dc:creator>caddis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Going Once... Going Twice...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50194/Going%2DOnce%2DGoing%2DTwice</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.postmichaelmckeeism.com/"&gt;Money on the Wall:&lt;/a&gt; PostMichael McKeeism  meticulously perfects the art-form that Warhol &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrysler.org/warhol/DollarSign.html&quot;&gt;dreamed of&lt;/a&gt;, The Who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewho.net/linernotes/WhoSellOut.htm&quot;&gt; toyed with&lt;/a&gt;, and and others are &lt;a href=http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2006-02-06-clerks-sequel_x.htm&gt;desperate&lt;/a&gt; to avoid.  Transactionism is an observation of art, the artist/patron relationship, and our own values, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/49800&quot;&gt;such&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2005/09/tweedy_kids_roc.html &quot;&gt;as&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.goldenpalaceevents.com/auctions/forehead01.php &quot;&gt;they&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/30/forehead.tattoo.ap/index.html%3Fsection=cnn_offbeat&quot;&gt;are.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50194</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:32:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>clerks</category>
		<category>forehead</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>postmichaelmckeeism</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>tattoo</category>
		<category>transactionism</category>
		<category>warhol</category>
		<dc:creator>hermitosis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Whole Foods? Yes! Suburban Sprawl? Oh Yeah!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48515/Whole%2DFoods%2DYes%2DSuburban%2DSprawl%2DOh%2DYeah</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060124/NEWS02/601240462"&gt;Indianapolis is getting a Whole Foods Market.&lt;/a&gt; Great, right? Whole Foods Market is a recognized leader in the ecologically friendly organic foods business and includes in its &quot;Core Values&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/corevalues.html&quot;&gt;Wise Environmental Practices &amp;amp; Community Citizenship&lt;/a&gt;. The location where this new market will be built will require the leveling of 17 acres of wooded land adjacent to a 50 year old residential neighborhood of 350 homes. This wooded area is one of the last homes for wild animals in the area.  Oh yeah, nobody that lives in the area wants it built either. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060121/NEWS01/601210438&amp;SearchID=73233541524636&quot;&gt;So much for core values.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48515</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:43:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>development</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>sprawl</category>
		<category>WholeFoodsMarket</category>
		<dc:creator>internal</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>In new music (express) we trust?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47120/In%2Dnew%2Dmusic%2Dexpress%2Dwe%2Dtrust</link>
		<description> Every year, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NME&quot; title=&quot;New Musical Express&quot;&gt;NME&lt;/a&gt; posts it&apos;s chart of the albums of the year poll - this year however they&apos;ve decided to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.londonist.com/archives/2005/11/scoop_nme_album.php&quot;&gt;rig the results&lt;/a&gt; purely for commercial purposes. (List inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47120</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:43:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>nme</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<dc:creator>gi_wrighty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>led zeppelin for zenga</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43294/led%2Dzeppelin%2Dfor%2Dzenga</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ilx.p3r.net/thread.php?msgid=5942033"&gt;What if Nike never apologized and then got away with it?&lt;/a&gt; A few weeks ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/43002&quot;&gt;Nike stole&lt;/a&gt; Minor Threat&apos;s classic album cover and with a few tiny changes tried to make it their own to promote a skateboarding tour.  Not to give other immoral megacorps any ideas, but...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43294</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 02:12:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>nike</category>
		<category>photoshop</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<dc:creator>tsarfan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>hilarity ensues</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34830/hilarity%2Densues</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/34732&quot;&gt;Followup&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://wired.com/news/business/0,1367,64472,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2&quot;&gt;Wired runs an article&lt;/a&gt; called &quot;Fark Sells Out, France Surrenders&quot;. Drew Curtis writes a &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=1069846&quot;&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; (note the sycophantic totalfarkers and more annoyed normal-farkers) -- but, as the article says, &quot;when pressed on the issue, Curtis &lt;i&gt;refused to deny&lt;/i&gt; that Fark accepts payment for placement of links&quot;. Was this really a case of one sales rep getting &quot;a little overenthusiastic&quot;? Is Drew ever actually going to deny selling Fark out, or will he just keep writing non-responses detailing his plans for selling it out even more in the future?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34830</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:48:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>DrewCurtis</category>
		<category>Fark</category>
		<category>payment</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7120/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://chicagotribune.com/business/businessnews/article/0,2669,ART-51284,FF.html"&gt;Bending over for Boeing:&lt;/a&gt; What does it mean when your city will spare no expense in an effort to impress a few corporate suits?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7120</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:47:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Boeing</category>
		<category>Sellout</category>
		<dc:creator>aladfar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6445/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/hardware/ads/ripmixburn.html"&gt;Rip Mix Burn? &lt;/a&gt; The issue here isn&apos;t the usual, &quot;Did they sell out?&quot; It&apos;s more a case of, Is this stellar groups saying Napster is OK (in a roundabout way), or did they just need the cash?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6445</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:57:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>burn</category>
		<category>mix</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>rip</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<dc:creator>raysmj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6314/</link>
		<description> &quot;After the J. C. Penney ad ran, they got a letter from a fan wondering how they could be that desperate; did they need the money for an operation or something?&quot; Tomorrow&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/11/magazine/11SELLOUT.html?pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;New York Times Magazine&lt;/a&gt; covers the Apples in Stereo and other bands that are jeopardizing their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/2914&quot;&gt;realness&lt;/a&gt; by selling songs to advertisers.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6314</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2001 08:16:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sellingout</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>sellouts</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5854/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dotcom.com/services/index.html"&gt;Network Solutions sells out.&lt;/a&gt; The once-monopoly has decided to pool all their domain name registration information and sell it to the spammers of the world. From their marketing website, &quot;Taking advantage of our position as a market leader, we have organized our pool of over 15 million registered domain names into a customer database of over 5 million unique customers. Our data service offers access to the key decision-makers behind millions of leading Web businesses.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

True, there is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networksolutions.com/en_US/legal/privacy-policy.html&quot;&gt;privacy policy&lt;/a&gt;, and you can try and protect yourself following their instructions, but it would seem that once the cat&apos;s out of the bag... And, what&apos;s to keep someone from purchasing the database of email addresses, fax numbers, telephone numbers, and addresses and selling them off to someone else?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5854</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:12:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>database</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>NetworkSolutions</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sellout</category>
		<category>spam</category>
		<category>spammers</category>
		<dc:creator>warhol</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


