<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sex-ed</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sex-ed</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sex-ed' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:49:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:49:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Big government in boardrooms, bad; in bedrooms, good</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34070/Big%2Dgovernment%2Din%2Dboardrooms%2Dbad%2Din%2Dbedrooms%2Dgood</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/31/news-ireland.php&quot;&gt;CDC recently issued new HIV prevention guidelines&lt;/a&gt; that would mandate all organizations that get any federal funding to submit all surveys, curricula, web materials, posters, ads, brochures, etc. to new community-based Policy Review Panels. Politically appointed censors rather than health officials will now decide what&apos;s acceptable in terms of HIV prevention and education. Materials must promote abstinence and include a message about the ineffectiveness of condom use in preventing the spread of HIV and STDs. There is a period of public comment on the new regulations until August 16. &lt;b&gt;&lt;small&gt; - more inside - &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/b&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34070</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:49:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abstinence</category>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>cdc</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>sex-ed</category>
		<dc:creator>madamjujujive</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>School sucks...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32994/School%2Dsucks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/08/conception.banned.ap/index.html"&gt;Monroe County Family Court Judge Marilyn O&apos;Connor ruled March 31 that&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/08/conception.banned.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;two parents &quot;should not have yet another child which must be cared for at public expense.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Unconstitutional? Maybe. But not sufficiently so for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=Marilyn+O%27Connor+site%3Awww.nyclu.org&quot;&gt;NY ACLU&lt;/a&gt; to say &lt;s&gt;much&lt;/s&gt; anything about it.

Maybe the Judge could have recommended the same sex-ed scheme that shows, in parts of England and Wales where it [called A Pause] was trialled in 104 schools, sexual intercourse among 16-year-olds fell by up to 20 per cent. 

Now that may mean we have to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ex.ac.uk/sshs/apause/rtschools7and8.htm&quot;&gt;more discussion&lt;/a&gt; of oral and manual, with less genital-genital emphasis. Anything that promotes the right to say &apos;no&apos; amongst vulnerable young folks is alright by me.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32994</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 11:12:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>sex-ed</category>
		<dc:creator>dash_slot-</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


