<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sexualharassmant</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sexualharassmant</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sexualharassmant' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 15:07:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 15:07:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Friends, with Joey as a serial rapist?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32934/Friends%2Dwith%2DJoey%2Das%2Da%2Dserial%2Drapist</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/04/grossman.friends/index.html"&gt;The One where the Writers Totally Got Themselves Uninvited from Any Parties at Courtney Cox or Jennifer Aniston&apos;s House.&lt;/a&gt; In the midst of all the dry-as-kindling &quot;Friends&quot; stories being published, there&apos;s been one spark: Amaani Lyle&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends1.html&quot;&gt;sexual harassment suit &lt;/a&gt;against the show&apos;s writers. While it&apos;s easy to be distracted by the actual meat of her complaint &#8212; making Joey a serial rapist (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends7.html&quot;&gt;#74&lt;/a&gt;), a fill-in-the-genitals coloring book (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends5.html&quot;&gt;#56-#58&lt;/a&gt;), the importance of spelling &quot;penis&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends5.html&quot;&gt;#59-#60&lt;/a&gt;), the twigs in Courtney Cox&apos;s uterus (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends8.html&quot;&gt;#91&lt;/a&gt;), a missed opportunity to bugger Jennifer Aniston (&lt;a href=&quot;http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/0423041friends8.html&quot;&gt;#88-#90&lt;/a&gt;) &#8212; their defense is even more interesting: Such talk is a necessary creative element of their job. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/04/grossman.friends/index.html&quot;&gt;Writes Joanna Grossman&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;The defendants admitted that many of Lyle&apos;s allegations were true. They testified in deposition that they did many of the things she complained of, but argued that the conduct was justified by &quot;creative necessity.&quot; The writers&apos; job, defendants argued, was to come up with story lines, dialogue, and jokes for a sitcom with adult sexual themes. To do this, they needed to have &quot;frank sexual discussions and tell colorful jokes and stories (and even make expressive gestures) as part of the creative process.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; An interesting new permutation in how we classify inappropriate workplace behavior with major ramifications for the creative class, or a big ol&apos; weaselly dodge?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32934</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 15:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amaanilyle</category>
		<category>friends</category>
		<category>joannagrossman</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>sexualharassmant</category>
		<dc:creator>blueshammer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


