<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sexualhistory</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sexualhistory</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sexualhistory' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:41:02 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:41:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>No more Scarlet Letter!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25373/No%2Dmore%2DScarlet%2DLetter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/04/24/publishing.adoptions.ap/index.html"&gt;Is this your fetus? Are you the one I slept with?&lt;/a&gt; Remember when we discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/19006&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;before?  Florida has now been forced by 4 plaintiffs and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/ReproductiveRights.cfm?ID=12443&amp;c=30&quot;&gt;ACLU &lt;/a&gt;to repeal the so-called Scarlet Letter law that forces women who are pregnant and giving children up for adoption to take out an ad local papers once a week for 4 weeks, stating her name and her sexual history in the last year, to let men know if they *might* be the father.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/ReproductiveRights/ReproductiveRights.cfm?ID=11126&amp;c=30&quot;&gt;Here &lt;/a&gt;is the ACLU legal brief.  The details about the decision are in the first link. 

Thank god for the ACLU.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25373</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>adoption</category>
		<category>adoptions</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexualhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>aacheson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19006/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-padopt080702.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines"&gt;Women who put babies up for adoption required to publish sexual pasts&lt;/a&gt;  Web sites &lt;a title=&quot;Websites that ask for certain information about kids under 13 have to get parental permission to get the information.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/kidzprivacy/kidz.htm&quot;&gt;can&apos;t collect info&lt;/a&gt; on minors, but Florida wants all women, including minors, to publish their sexual history in local newspapers before they&apos;re allowed to give their child up for adoption.  Abortions are &lt;a title=&quot;73 percent of Florida counties have no abortion provider, there are only an estimated 114 total abortion providers in the entire state.&quot; href=&quot;http://www.naral.com/mediaresources/publications/2002/florida.pdf&quot;&gt;difficult to get&lt;/a&gt; in Florida, almost impossible for some minors because of parental notification and permission requirements, yet wouldn&apos;t this law push more women towards abortion rather than towards adoption?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19006</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 22:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>adoption</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexualhistory</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


