<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with silicongermanium</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/silicongermanium</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'silicongermanium' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:55:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:55:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15164/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020225/bs_nm/tech_ibm_dc_21"&gt;IBM gives Moore&apos;s Law a punch in the face&lt;/a&gt; by developing a 110GHz silicon germanium microchip. Only for use in ultra hi-tech environments right now (network infrastructure, military, etc.), of course. What other things could these processors be useful for? Finding vaccines? Genome mapping? SETI? And how many years before they&apos;re mass-producible and inexpensive enough for consumer use?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15164</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:55:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>microchips</category>
		<category>mooreslaw</category>
		<category>silicongermanium</category>
		<dc:creator>andnbsp</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


