<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sitedesign</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sitedesign</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sitedesign' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:41:33 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:41:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Not so Flashy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24218/Not%2Dso%2DFlashy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/cnet/stories/991868.htm"&gt;Users don&apos;t like a lot of Flash&lt;/a&gt; - Looks like Macromedia&apos;s new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com&quot;&gt;Web site redesign&lt;/a&gt; that utilizes all Flash for its navigation isn&apos;t winning any awards with users, especially those running Opera and Apple&apos;s Safari browsers. It&apos;s nice looking, but I prefer a simpler design like here MetaFilter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24218</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>macromedia</category>
		<category>multimedia</category>
		<category>sitedesign</category>
		<category>websitedesign</category>
		<category>websites</category>
		<dc:creator>MediaMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


