<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with slate and Microsoft</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/slate+Microsoft</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'slate' and 'Microsoft' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:55:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:55:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>in other news, there is no evil microsoft conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34071/in%2Dother%2Dnews%2Dthere%2Dis%2Dno%2Devil%2Dmicrosoft%2Dconspiracy</link>
		<description> What the heck? Now even Slate is saying that &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2103152/&quot;&gt;you should ditch IE and switch to Firefox&lt;/a&gt;. But, as they say in the article, Slate is owned by Microsoft...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34071</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:55:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>browser</category>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>reklaw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biz Stratergy MS uses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27141/Biz%2DStratergy%2DMS%2Duses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/"&gt;Google: the God that failed?&lt;/a&gt; is the title of the article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN Slate&lt;/a&gt;. All of us know Microsoft is working on a new search engine technology. Till date everyone considers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; to be &lt;em&gt;the Guru&lt;/em&gt;. MS obviously doesn&apos;t like that, so what it is doing? Well, the same thing it always does - to survive competition, eliminate it.
The reasons being given by the article are pretty silly and more aimed at &apos;faming down&apos; Google.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27141</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>jayantk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11900/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057573&amp;amp;device="&gt;If you crow about your redesign,&lt;/a&gt; claiming your site is now &quot;better-looking and easier to use&quot; (and not, say, &quot;sludgy as Hotmail and nearly as ugly&quot;), and you offer a &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057522&quot; title=&quot;It didn&apos;t work for hours&quot;&gt;graphical tour&lt;/a&gt; to &quot;show you how all these slick new features work&quot;, the link to which is a 404, are you the stupidest monopoly around?

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just wondering.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11900</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>404</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>website</category>
		<dc:creator>textist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9360/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/code/kausfiles/kausfiles.asp?Show=7/29/2001&amp;idMessage=8058&quot;&gt;Slate&apos;s Mickey Kaus&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56188-2001Jul26.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; ask the question: For all the claims of illegal monopolies and unfair advantage, is the tech industry counting on Microsoft and Windows XP&apos;s Oct. 25 release to save its bacon?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9360</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2001 08:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>MickeyKaus</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Slate</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<category>WindowsXP</category>
		<category>WinXP</category>
		<category>XP</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


