<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with slate and media</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/slate+media</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'slate' and 'media' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:38:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:38:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Forgetting Equatorial Guinea</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72777/Forgetting%2DEquatorial%2DGuinea</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ek.html&quot;&gt;Equatorial Guinea&lt;/a&gt; is more than your average &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/world/africa/23zimbabwe.html&quot;&gt;headline-making&lt;/a&gt;, human rights-eschewing African nation. Likening the country&#8217;s uneasy street-silence to that of Pyongyang, deported journalist Peter Maass reveals &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2193870/&quot;&gt;an unparalleled culture of fear blanketed by an international media blackout&lt;/a&gt;. But for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/01/12_400.html&quot;&gt;Whitehouse&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/natres/oil/2003/0816blind.htm&quot;&gt;ExxonMobil&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,434691,00.html&quot;&gt;Teodoro Obiang&lt;/a&gt;&#8212;Equatorial Guinea&#8217;s torturous leader&#8212;the poverty, abuse and dead-quiet are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1101-2004Sep6.html&quot;&gt;business as usual&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72777</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:38:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>africa</category>
		<category>corporations</category>
		<category>corporatocracy</category>
		<category>equatorialguinea</category>
		<category>exxonmobil</category>
		<category>humanrights</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>oil</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>dead_</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Grey Lady Falters</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25689/The%2DGrey%2DLady%2DFalters</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html"&gt;Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception&lt;/a&gt; The New York Times runs a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/national/11PAPE.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;long article detailing its preliminary findings in the matter of Jayson Blair, The Times&apos; young staff reporter who made up sources, facts, and anecdotes in potentially hundreds of stories.  Does this investigation help the Times avoid permanent disgrace? Or does this just confirm what you&apos;ve always &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartertimes.com/archive_index.html&quot;&gt;thought about the Times?&lt;/a&gt; Slate magazine is attributing part of the problem to &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2082661/&quot;&gt;affirmative action&lt;/a&gt; (Blair is black). Is AA &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.observer.com/observer/pages/offtherec.asp&quot;&gt;relevant here?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25689</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2003 10:14:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>affirmativeaction</category>
		<category>blair</category>
		<category>fabrications</category>
		<category>fraud</category>
		<category>jaysonblair</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>journalists</category>
		<category>kaus</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>mickeykaus</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>plagiarism</category>
		<category>plagiarists</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>hhc5</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Smart Bombed</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24433/Smart%2DBombed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2080346"&gt;How much coverage of Elizabeth Smart&apos;s kidnapping is too much?&lt;/a&gt; I don&apos;t know if any of you have been as bothered as I have by this blanket coverage -- not that it&apos;s anything new by our media. But it&apos;s disturbing nonetheless. From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com&quot;&gt;Slate Magazine.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24433</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 08:58:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coverage</category>
		<category>elizabethsmart</category>
		<category>excessive</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>{savg*pncl}</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2068449"&gt;On media darlings.&lt;/a&gt; Do you think this was deliberate or a coincidence? Who do you think are the other darlings of the mainstream media in USA and elsewhere (i.e. if you accept Slate&apos;s premise)?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18679</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2002 03:01:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>justlooking</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12001/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/?id=2057986"&gt;Are war reporters manufacturing a picture of a failing war effort?&lt;/a&gt; Slate&apos;s William Saletan makes some interesting points. Reporters get frustrated simply reporting the same stuff each day -- they want &lt;i&gt;news&lt;/i&gt;. With the current rarity of dramatic events in Afghanistan, Saletan suggests, media outlets are growing impatient, and letting their &quot;professional biases&quot; distort the picture they present. &lt;small&gt;(Shucks. If only Bin Laden had tried to escape in a white Ford Bronco....)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12001</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2001 08:22:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>middleeastwar</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<category>warreporters</category>
		<category>williamsaletan</category>
		<dc:creator>mattpfeff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


