<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with slavery and CivilWar</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/slavery+CivilWar</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'slavery' and 'CivilWar' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:03 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Reenacting Slavery</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75130/Reenacting%2DSlavery</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bullyforbragg.blogspot.com/2008/09/co-aytch-recap.html"&gt;Reenacting slavery at Chickamauga National Military Park.&lt;/a&gt; When a reenactor put his knapsack on the ground, the person portraying his slave picked up his knapsack and &quot;moved it before I could say a word. I instantly knew that I had an opportunity to demonstrate the institution&apos;s cruelty here, and so I did not acknowledge his act, did not thank him for it, did not make eye contact, did not stop my talk. My own cruelty -- even to make a teaching point to the audience -- made me shudder inside.&quot; I read this blog post this morning and have been thinking about it on and off all day. They&apos;ve been doing slavery interpretation at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.history.org/Media/podcasts_transcripts/RecallingAfricanAmericanInterpretation.cfm&quot;&gt;Colonial Williamsburg &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.history.org/Almanack/places/hb/hbslave.cfm&quot;&gt;Carter&apos;s Grove&lt;/a&gt; for awhile, but this isn&apos;t something you see on Civil War battlefields very often, if ever.

Another thing that struck me about this was the portrayal of the day-to-day degradation of slavery and not even being acknowledged as person; rather than the more dramatic beatings, runaways, and slave auctions.

And I&apos;d love to read this from the point of view from the guy who portrayed the slave. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75130</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:10:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilwar</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>livinghistory</category>
		<category>nationalparkservice</category>
		<category>reenactors</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<dc:creator>marxchivist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What Happened to My Forty Acres and a Mule, Fool?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67450/What%2DHappened%2Dto%2DMy%2DForty%2DAcres%2Dand%2Da%2DMule%2DFool</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.emergingminds.org/magazine/content/item/1303"&gt;40 acres and a mule&lt;/a&gt; has been a slogan of African-American economic aspirations ever since the legislation creating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freedmensbureau.com/&quot;&gt;the Freedman&apos;s Bureau&lt;/a&gt; promised ex-slaves &lt;a href=&quot;http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsb&amp;fileName=039/llsb039.db&amp;recNum=327&quot;&gt;parcels not exceeding forty acres each, to the loyal refugees and freedmen&lt;/a&gt;.  General William Tecumseh Sherman&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/sfo15.htm&quot;&gt;Special Field Order No. 15&lt;/a&gt; decreed that the land on slave plantations be seized and distributed to freed slaves, but Andrew Johnson rescinded the order and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.impeach-andrewjohnson.com/05AJFirstVetoes/iiia-5.htm&quot;&gt;vetoed expansion of the Freedman&apos;s Bureau&lt;/a&gt;.  Both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/opinion/18gates.html&quot;&gt;Henry Louis Gates&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mondediplo.com/2001/09/08richconley&quot;&gt;Dalton Conley&lt;/a&gt; have associated the failure to grant freed slaves their &quot;40 acres and a mule&quot; with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010326/conley&quot;&gt;wealth gap&lt;/a&gt; between black and white Americans, but now an economics grad student, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-personal.umich.edu/~millermc/&quot;&gt;Melinda Miller&lt;/a&gt;, has brought important quantitative data to the debate in a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-personal.umich.edu/~millermc/Job_Market_Paper.pdf&quot;&gt;research paper&lt;/a&gt;. Using census data from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://cherokeehistory.com/&quot;&gt;Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma&lt;/a&gt;, which was forced to distribute land to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jalagi.org/freedmenstory.html&quot;&gt;freed slaves of the Cherokee tribe&lt;/a&gt; shortly after the Civil War, Miller has found a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_experiment&quot;&gt;natural experiment&lt;/a&gt; that makes it possible to quantify how much the failed dreams of &quot;40 acres of a mule&quot; are at the root of interracial disparities of wealth.  According to a fine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/12/would-it-have-h.html&quot;&gt;summary&lt;/a&gt; by econo-blogger Tyler Cowen, Miller argues that the failure to distribute land to slaves may account for as little as 20% or as much as 75% of the black/white wealth gap. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67450</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:26:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>40acresandamule</category>
		<category>africanamericans</category>
		<category>cherokeenation</category>
		<category>cherokees</category>
		<category>CivilWar</category>
		<category>economichistory</category>
		<category>economicinequality</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>freedmen</category>
		<category>freedmensbureau</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>inequality</category>
		<category>race</category>
		<category>racialinequality</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<category>slaves</category>
		<category>wealth</category>
		<dc:creator>jonp72</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The stories we tell ourselves about ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59997/The%2Dstories%2Dwe%2Dtell%2Dourselves%2Dabout%2Dourselves</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/03/AR2007040301915.html?sub=AR"&gt;Lost Cause&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;small&gt;WaPo,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bugmenot.com/view/www.washingtonpost.com&quot;&gt;bugmenot&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;] History museums are a repository for public memory, but also a nation&apos;s mirrors, reflecting self-image. When our views of history shift, museums that fail to change are likely to fail in general.  Today&apos;s Washington Post reports on the struggle and decline of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moc.org/site/PageServer&quot;&gt;Museum of the Confederacy&lt;/a&gt;, contrasting it with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tredegar.org/&quot;&gt;American Civil War Center&lt;/a&gt;, nearby geographically, worlds away in philosophy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59997</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:48:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilwar</category>
		<category>confederacy</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>museum</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yes... or no?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27612/Yes%2Dor%2Dno</link>
		<description> Giuseppe Garibaldi, who united Italy in the 1860s, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,235796,00.html&quot;&gt;was asked by Lincoln&lt;/a&gt; to lead the army during the US Civil War. Garibaldi said he would if Lincoln officially declared that the aim of the war was to end slavery. Lincoln replied that he couldn&apos;t at that time, and so Garibaldi &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.britannica.com/search?query=Giuseppe%20Garibaldi&amp;ct=&amp;fuzzy=N&quot;&gt;moved on to other things&lt;/a&gt;. But what if Giuseppe had gotten involved? The Papacy would clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reformation.org/garibaldi.html&quot;&gt;have denounced the North&lt;/a&gt; (indeed, the pope was the only world leader to recognize the Confederacy). The French hated him; the English loved him. Had he led the Federal troops, would France have jumped in on the side of the South? Would England have then jumped in on the Union side to counter?  A whole different world history, perhaps, hanging on a yes/no question.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:48:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abolition</category>
		<category>AbrahamLincoln</category>
		<category>AlternateHistory</category>
		<category>CivilWar</category>
		<category>Garibaldi</category>
		<category>GiuseppeGaribaldi</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>Italy</category>
		<category>Lincoln</category>
		<category>redshirts</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<category>Unification</category>
		<dc:creator>ewagoner</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


