<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with snark</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/snark</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'snark' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:26:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:26:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Slow lede - get to the news faster</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86538/Slow%2Dlede%2Dget%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dnews%2Dfaster</link>
		<description> When the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestar.com/&quot;&gt;Toronto Star&lt;/a&gt; announced that they were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2009/11/03/toronto-star-buyouts-restructuring693.html
&quot;&gt;outsourcing in-house editing jobs&lt;/a&gt;, the union &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2009/03/c5496.html&quot;&gt;wasn&apos;t too happy&lt;/a&gt;. Neither was &lt;a href=&quot;http://torontoist.com/2009/11/disgruntled_star_editor_takes_revenge.php&quot;&gt;this disgruntled editor&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86538</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>outsourcing</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>torontostar</category>
		<dc:creator>Saxon Kane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Snark Snark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84580/Snark%2DSnark</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/aug/29/digital-media-celebrity-snark"&gt;Snark.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84580</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:34:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cynicism</category>
		<category>discourse</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Olli</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is this your homework, Larry?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83428/Is%2Dthis%2Dyour%2Dhomework%2DLarry</link>
		<description> The research, literary, and copy editors of Vanity Fair &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/07/palin-speech-edit-200907&quot;&gt;go to town&lt;/a&gt; on Sarah Palin&apos;s resignation speech.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;seeing as nearly everyone I talked to at the 10th meetup was an editor of some kind, you&apos;ll all get a kick out of this&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83428</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:57:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editing</category>
		<category>grammar</category>
		<category>markup</category>
		<category>palin</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>sarahpalin</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Jon_Evil</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Science Fiction Fandom: your shortlists aren&#8217;t very good.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83362/Science%2DFiction%2DFandom%2Dyour%2Dshortlists%2Darent%2Dvery%2Dgood</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://punkadiddle.blogspot.com/2009/07/hugos-2009.html"&gt;&quot;Science Fiction Fandom: your shortlists aren&#8217;t very good.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Writer, critic and literary academic &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Roberts_(critic)&quot;&gt;Adam Roberts&lt;/a&gt; has a problem with the shortlists for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehugoawards.org/&quot;&gt;2009 Hugo Awards&lt;/a&gt;: in his view, they&apos;re unimaginative, conservative and profoundly lazy. Are his concerns valid? And even if they are, should anyone expect more from a popular nominated award voted on by people eligible only through having joined the current or previous &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldcon&quot;&gt;World Science Fiction Convention&lt;/a&gt;? Given the existence of jury-selected awards such as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nebulaawards.com/&quot;&gt;Nebula&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clarkeaward.com/&quot;&gt;Clarke&lt;/a&gt;, what&apos;s wrong with the Hugo letting ordinary readers and fans having the chance to vote for what they liked?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83362</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:01:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>sciencefiction</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Major Clanger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why chicks cry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83019/Why%2Dchicks%2Dcry</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://johnglenntaylor.blogspot.com/2009/06/66-panels-why-chicks-cry.html"&gt;Why chicks cry.&lt;/a&gt; Images of women and girls crying, taken from DC romance comics 1957 to 1968. via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com&quot;&gt;Smart Bitches, Trashy Books&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83019</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:52:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>comics</category>
		<category>crying</category>
		<category>DCcomics</category>
		<category>easilymused</category>
		<category>humour</category>
		<category>johnglenntaylor</category>
		<category>pictures</category>
		<category>romance</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>tears</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>paduasoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>20 Years Of Supercilious Gits</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81500/20%2DYears%2DOf%2DSupercilious%2DGits</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/20th/&quot;&gt;Twenty years old this year&lt;/a&gt;, fifteen-minute long Australian television programme &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Watch_(TV_program)&quot;&gt;Media Watch&lt;/a&gt; criticises television and print journalism. 

(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/55399/Plagiarism-of-Wikipedia&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81500</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:59:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abc</category>
		<category>affairs</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>current</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>packofnastybastards</category>
		<category>pompousgit</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>watch</category>
		<dc:creator>Fiasco da Gama</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Psychologist Analyzes the Increasing Pervasiveness of Snark.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80799/A%2DPsychologist%2DAnalyzes%2Dthe%2DIncreasing%2DPervasiveness%2Dof%2DSnark</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-personality-analyst/200904/snark-why-it-matters"&gt;A Psychologist Analyzes the Increasing Pervasiveness of Snark.&lt;/a&gt; From the &lt;i&gt;Psychology Today&lt;/i&gt; blog site comes this article about snark, Gawker, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B001QA4SXS/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;David Denby&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s definitions of &quot;snark&quot; versus &quot;Satire.&quot; One choice quote from the article:  &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;i&gt;[S]nark is an inherently unjust exercise: The purveyor of snark, and his or her amused audience, temporarily overlook any of their own human faults, while identifying and magnifying others&apos; all-too-human foibles.  At least temporarily, the snarker takes on the perspective of a narcissist, viewing others as unworthy, and exploiting and blaming those others for their all-too-human deficits. Perhaps some of today&apos;s snarking is associated with the apparent rising level of narcissism in our society.  &lt;/i&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80799</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:43:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gawker</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>crazyray</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Clip Art + Snark = Funny</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79723/Clip%2DArt%2DSnark%2DFunny</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.treatloaf.com/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;The blood slowly drained from his head.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Soon, everything would go dark for Curtis.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Clip Art + Snark = Funny  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79723</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:13:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>clip</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>treatloaf</category>
		<dc:creator>Cool Papa Bell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Hunting of the Snark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79398/The%2DHunting%2Dof%2Dthe%2DSnark</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/books/review/Kirn-t.html?ref=books&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Snark - A Polemic in Seven Fits&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79398</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:11:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>nevercalm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Internet Answer To Obvious Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76680/The%2DInternet%2DAnswer%2DTo%2DObvious%2DQuestions</link>
		<description> There are times when you are asked startlingly obvious questions - &lt;a href=&quot;http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/&quot;&gt;here is the all-purpose response&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76680</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:02:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amusing</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>link</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>tutorial</category>
		<dc:creator>Happy Dave</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Trolling the head of the TSA</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76618/Trolling%2Dthe%2Dhead%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTSA</link>
		<description> Trolling the Head of the TSA: Bruce Schneier [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/contribute/search.mefi?site=mefi&amp;q=bruce+schneier&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;], consummate voice of sanity on all issues of security, co-authors an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200811/airport-security&quot;&gt;article in The Atlantic&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/75714/The-Things-He-Carried&quot;&gt;previously&lt;/a&gt;] demonstrating how weak and ultimately pointless most of the new security practices put in place at airports since 9/11 are by, among other things, boarding airplanes with large amounts of liquid, using fake boarding passes he printed off his computer, and wearing an &quot;I &amp;lt;3 Hezbollah&quot; t-shirt. TSA head Kip Hawley then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tsa.gov/blog/2008/10/tsas-take-on-atlantic-article.html&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt; on the TSA&apos;s blog. Schneier then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/kip_hawley_resp.html&quot;&gt;responds to the response&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; blog. Hawley then leaves &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/kip_hawley_resp.html#c321445&quot;&gt;a comment&lt;/a&gt; to that post. Schneier &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0811.html#2&quot;&gt;fires back again&lt;/a&gt; in his monthly newsletter. Quite an interesting and intelligent debate, despite both men humorously falling victim to the idioms of the medium and getting increasingly snarky with each passing post. &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0811.html&quot;&gt;via this month&apos;s crypto-gram&lt;/a&gt;, a good read all the way around.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76618</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>airport</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>schneier</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>troll</category>
		<category>tsa</category>
		<dc:creator>ChasFile</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Snark Kills.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69571/Snark%2DKills</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/02262008/business/blogs_of_death_99343.htm"&gt;Snark Kills.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69571</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deadly</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>mosch</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Psychology of Snarkiness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69137/The%2DPsychology%2Dof%2DSnarkiness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20070625-000002.html"&gt;...people whose brains are best equipped to understand sarcasm tend to have aggressive personalities.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;Also: &quot;those who can hang with sarcasm are always the most interesting conversation partners at a party&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69137</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:36:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>mecran01</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Snark of New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64295/The%2DSnark%2Dof%2DNew%2DOrleans</link>
		<description> Since when did we get
&lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.nolevee.com/?article=army_corps_completed_cat_5_levee_protection&quot;&gt;
cat 5 levees&lt;/a&gt;?  Or a working
&lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.nolevee.com/?article=new_plan_will_prevent_future_flood_losses&quot;&gt;
flood plan&lt;/a&gt;?  Behold the
&lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.nolevee.com/&quot;&gt;New Orleans Levee&lt;/a&gt;, where
&apos;We don&apos;t hold anything back.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64295</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:24:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>katrina</category>
		<category>neworleans</category>
		<category>orleans</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>localroger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FIRE JOE MORGAN</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63321/FIRE%2DJOE%2DMORGAN</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.firejoemorgan.com/"&gt;Blog gives healthy Fisking to the worst sportswriting around,&lt;/a&gt; with a focus on Joe Morgan, perhaps the dumbest baseball analyst ever. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2007/03/blogs-bad-old-media-good-nerds-nerdy.html&quot;&gt;previous oblique MeFi reference.&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63321</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:25:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>baseball</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>fucktheheck</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s also OK to judge a book by its lover, Stevie Wonder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60802/Its%2Dalso%2DOK%2Dto%2Djudge%2Da%2Dbook%2Dby%2Dits%2Dlover%2DStevie%2DWonder</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.judgeabook.blogspot.com/"&gt;Books judged by covers.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://joshreads.com&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60802</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 18:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>bookcovers</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>pulp</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Best. Judicial. Ruling. EVER.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53014/Best%2DJudicial%2DRuling%2DEVER</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mithras.blogs.com/blog/bradshaw.pdf"&gt;Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp., Inc. (147 F.Supp.2d 668)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;Both attorneys have obviously entered into a secret pact--complete with hats, handshakes and cryptic words--to draft their pleadings entirely in crayon on the back sides of gravy-stained paper place mats, in the hope that the Court would be so charmed by their child-like efforts that their utter dearth of legal authorities in their briefing would go unnoticed. Whatever actually occurred, the Court is now faced with the daunting task of deciphering their submissions. With Big Chief tablet readied, thick black pencil in hand, and a devil-may-care laugh in the face of death, life on the razor&apos;s edge sense of exhilaration, the Court begins.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53014</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:56:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>court</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Kat Allison</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oooh, Now *THIS* is my flavor of Patriotism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52746/Oooh%2DNow%2DTHIS%2Dis%2Dmy%2Dflavor%2Dof%2DPatriotism</link>
		<description> In early 1777 Gen Burgoyne assumes command of the northern Redcoat column marching from Canada. On June 20, 1777 he issues his infamous &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teachingamericanhistory.com/library/index.asp?document=871&quot;&gt;Proclamation&lt;/a&gt; of how &amp;amp; why he&apos;s coming down to kick Rebel behind. History records one unknown patriot&apos;s snark-filled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historiclakes.org/explore/proclamation2.htm&quot;&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt; that July. By October, Burgoyne&apos;s flying column is bottled up and defeated at Saratoga. Here ends the history lesson. Have a great 4th, peeps.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.52746</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:55:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>patriotism</category>
		<category>revolutionary-war</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Heywood Mogroot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>douchebags</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39550/douchebags</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rockandrollconfidential.com/hall/index.php"&gt;brickwallers and douchebags.&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s incredibly cruel but oh so clever. Exposing the band promo photo. You might think you look good but this guy will identify your weak point and skewer you with a bon mot - which is a hell of a lot more painful than anything else you can be skewered with. Even sharp things.  A couple of favourites are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockandrollconfidential.com/hall/hall_detail.php?dd_keyid=661&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockandrollconfidential.com/hall/hall_detail.php?dd_keyid=147&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, which almost killed me. If you get it you&apos;ll know what I mean.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39550</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:53:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bands</category>
		<category>douchebags</category>
		<category>photos</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>milkwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ruh-Roh.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36752/RuhRoh</link>
		<description> &apos;&apos;My fellow Americans, I&apos;m pleased to tell you today I&apos;ve just signed legislation which outlaws [the Blue States] forever. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=227410&quot;&gt;bombing &lt;/a&gt;begins in five minutes.&apos;&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36752</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 17:56:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accident</category>
		<category>crappost</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hunting snark</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32211/Hunting%2Dsnark</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bookforum.com/birkerts.html"&gt;Snark.&lt;/a&gt; In the newest issue of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookforum.com/index.html&quot;&gt;Bookforum&lt;/a&gt;, critic Sven Birkerts ruminates on what he considers to be the regrettable rise of the snarky book review, taking as his starting example &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.powells.com/review/2002_07_04.html&quot;&gt;Dale Peck&apos;s hatchet job on Rick Moody, written in 2002.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;&quot;Psychologically [the literary] landscape [is one that is] subtly demoralized by the slash-and-burn of bottom-line economics; the modernist/humanist assumption of art and social criticism marching forward, leading the way, has not recovered from the wholesale flight of academia into theory; the publishing world remains tyrannized in acquisition, marketing, and sales by the mentality of the blockbuster; the confident authority of print journalism has been challenged by the proliferation of online alternatives. [...] All of this leads, and not all that circuitously, to the question of snark, the spirit of negativity, the personal animus pushing ahead of the intellectual or critical agenda. Snark is, I believe, prompted by the terrible vacuum feeling of not mattering, not connecting, not being heard; it is fueled by rage at the same.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32211</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2004 08:09:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bookforum</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DalePeck</category>
		<category>essay</category>
		<category>HatchetJobs</category>
		<category>litcrit</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>negativity</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>publishing</category>
		<category>RickMoody</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>SvenBirkerts</category>
		<category>writing</category>
		<dc:creator>Prospero</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fandom is fucking funny</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29050/Fandom%2Dis%2Dfucking%2Dfunny</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank"&gt;Love the shows, beware the fans.&lt;/a&gt; That seems to be the gist of fandom_wank. And because God knows lunacy isn&apos;t limited to fandom, on the seventh day, God created spinoffs. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalfen.net/community/i_wank&quot;&gt;Mock.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalfen.net/community/otf_wank&quot;&gt;Mockmockmock.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_rant&quot;&gt;Mockity-mock-mock.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29050</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:23:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fanboys</category>
		<category>fandom</category>
		<category>fans</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<category>spinoffs</category>
		<dc:creator>FunkyHelix</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4322/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeattleTimes.woa/wa/gotoArticle?zsection_id=268448385&amp;amp;text_only=0&amp;amp;slug=earn13&amp;amp;document_id=134246683"&gt;Irony is out; sincerity is in.&lt;/a&gt; Is it true?  Is irony dead?  Is sarcasm pass&#xe9;?  Have we finally snarked out once and for all?  If so, what place will our beloved ironists (and sarcastinators) have in this new Age of Earnestness?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4322</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 01:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>irony</category>
		<category>sarcasm</category>
		<category>SeattleTimes</category>
		<category>sincerity</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>Byun-o-matic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/502/</link>
		<description> I don&apos;t know how many MetaFilter readers are &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.epinions.com/&apos;&gt;epinions&lt;/a&gt; members (my guess is that a lot are), but if you&apos;ve surfed around anyone&apos;s circle of trust before, I&apos;m sure you&apos;ve found &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.epinions.com/user-conglomerate_mosthated&apos;&gt;conglomerate_mosthated&lt;/a&gt;, a popular reviewer with an equally sharp tongue and wit. Some of my favorites of his include the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-2C9A-150D205-37D92314-prod1&apos;&gt;Xterra review&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.epinions.com/musc-review-16D2-2C0B4E0-37DD24DD-bd4&apos;&gt;Britney Spears review&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.epinions.com/auto-review-2959-238BB56-37F0D4B5-bd1&apos;&gt;Jetta review&lt;/a&gt;. He&apos;s sometimes offending, oftentimes catty, and always amusing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.502</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 01:39:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>catty</category>
		<category>Conglomerate_MostHated</category>
		<category>Epinions</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>reviewer</category>
		<category>snark</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


