<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with socialpsychology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/socialpsychology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'socialpsychology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:50:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:50:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>I blame... let&apos;s see...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86848/I%2Dblame%2Dlets%2Dsee</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091119194124.htm"&gt;Shifting Blame Is Socially Contagious.&lt;/a&gt; Merely observing someone publicly blame an individual in an organization for a problem -- even when the target is innocent -- greatly increases the odds that the practice of blaming others will spread with the tenacity of the H1N1 flu, according to new research.

&quot;When we see others protecting their egos, we become defensive too,&quot; says Fast, the study&apos;s lead author. &quot;We then try to protect our own self-image by blaming others for our mistakes, which may feel good in the moment.&quot; He adds that in the long run, such behavior could hurt one&apos;s reputation and be destructive to an organization and further to our society as a whole. When public blaming becomes common practice -- especially by leaders -- its effects on an organization can be insidious and withering: Individuals who are fearful of being blamed for something become less willing to take risks, are less innovative or creative, and are less likely to learn from their mistakes.

President Richard Nixon is one example the authors point to in the study. Nixon harbored an intense need to enhance and protect his self-image and, as a result, made a practice of blaming others for his shortcomings. His former aides reported that that this ego-defensiveness pervaded his administration. It was the culture of fear and blame that ultimately led to Nixon&apos;s political downfall. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86848</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:50:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BlameGame</category>
		<category>CultureOfBlame</category>
		<category>EgoProtection</category>
		<category>SelfImage</category>
		<category>SocialPsychology</category>
		<dc:creator>VikingSword</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Replicating the Milgram Experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72655/Replicating%2Dthe%2DMilgram%2DExperiment</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/the-milgram-experiment-today/"&gt;The Milgram Experiment Today?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Students commonly assume that, even if &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment&quot;&gt;Milgram&#8217;s famous experiment&lt;/a&gt; sheds important light on the power of situation today, were his experiment precisely reproduced today, it would not generate comparable results. To oversimplify the argument behind that claim: The power of white lab coats just ain&#8217;t what it used to be. Of course, that assertion has been difficult to challenge given that the option of replicating the Milgram experiment has been presumptively unavailable &#8212; indeed, it has been the paradigmatic example of why psychology experiments must be reviewed by institutional review boards (&apos;IRBs&apos;). Who would even attempt to challenge that presumption? The answer: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scu.edu/cas/psychology/faculty/burger.cfm&quot;&gt;Jerry Burger&lt;/a&gt;, a psychology professor at Santa Clara University. With some slight modifications, Burger manage to obtain permission to replicate Milgram&#8217;s experiment &#8212; and the results may surprise you.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/01/milgrams_notorious_.html&quot;&gt;MindHacks&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72655</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:35:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Authoritarianism</category>
		<category>Evil</category>
		<category>milgram</category>
		<category>MilgramExperiment</category>
		<category>Obedience</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>SocialPsychology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Questioning the banality of evil</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67876/Questioning%2Dthe%2Dbanality%2Dof%2Devil</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/archive/archive_home.cfm?volumeID=21&amp;amp;editionID=155&amp;amp;ArticleID=1291"&gt;Questioning the banality of evil.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;There is a widespread consensus amongst psychologists that tyranny triumphs either because ordinary people blindly follow orders or else because they mindlessly conform to powerful roles. However, recent evidence concerning historical events challenges these views. In particular, studies of the Nazi regime reveal that its functionaries engaged actively and creatively with their tasks. Re-examination of classic social psychological studies points to the same dynamics at work. This article summarises these developments and lays out the case for an updated social psychology of tyranny that explains both the influence of tyrannical leaders and the active contributions of their followers.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;Mind Hacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.67876</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:50:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Authoritarianism</category>
		<category>Evil</category>
		<category>Nazism</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>SocialPsychology</category>
		<category>Tyranny</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Before Kid Nation, there was Robbers Cave</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65809/Before%2DKid%2DNation%2Dthere%2Dwas%2DRobbers%2DCave</link>
		<description> &quot;In the summer of 1954, twenty-two fifth-grade boys were taken out to a campground at Robbers Cave State Park, Oklahoma. [...] Ostensibly it was an unremarkable summer camp. [...] what they had really done for two and a half weeks was unwittingly take part in an elaborate and fascinating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/psychology/social/sherif_robbers_cave_experiment.html&quot;&gt;psychological&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=595/ghjmk/&quot;&gt;experiment&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; The experiment was conducted by&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muzafer_Sherif&quot;&gt; Muzafer Sherif&lt;/a&gt; to test the following hypotheses:
&lt;blockquote&gt;(1) When individuals having no established relationships are brought together to interact in group activities with common goals, they produce a group structure with hierarchical statuses and roles within it.

(2) If two in-groups thus formed are brought into functional relationship under conditions of competition and group frustration, attitudes and appropriate hostile actions in relation to the out-group and its members will arise and will be standardized and shared in varying degrees by group members.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Sherif/index.htm&quot;&gt; The results&lt;/a&gt; were published in 1961. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65809</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:53:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conflict</category>
		<category>conflictresolution</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>sherif</category>
		<category>socialpsychology</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It couldn&apos;t happen here, you say?...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24527/It%2Dcouldnt%2Dhappen%2Dhere%2Dyou%2Dsay</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.geocities.com/Broadway/3145/wave.html"&gt;As one, the students shouted, &quot;Strength through discipline!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - &quot;The Third Wave&quot;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paweekly.com/paw/Centennial/1994_Apr_15.1960SC.html&quot;&gt;A Dangerous Experiment&lt;/a&gt;. More disturbing even than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;Milgram Experiment&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;: &quot;When Ron Jones started teaching at Cubberley High School in the fall of 1968, it was considered the most innovative of Palo Alto&apos;s high schools. ....His methods were experimental and his goal was to bring social studies to life.....Jones turned his class into an efficient youth organization, which he called the Third Wave. Some students were informers, and some were told they couldn&apos;t go certain places on campus. He insisted on rigid posture and that questions be answered formally and quickly.....&quot;It was strange how quickly the students took to a uniform code of behavior. I began to wonder just how far they cold be pushed,&quot; Jones wrote....But soon the experiment began spinning out of control.... five days into the experiment, Jones announced, &lt;b&gt;&quot;We can bring (the nation) a new sense of order, community, pride, and action. Everything rests on you and your willingness to take a stand.&quot;&lt;/b&gt; As one, the students shouted, &quot;Strength through discipline!&quot; &quot;. &lt;/small&gt; Ron Jones wrote about it in &lt;a href=&quot;http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:Brs1Rv5PLuQC:solomonsrefuge.com/civil_liberties_911.htm+No+substitute+for+madness&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&quot;&gt;No substitute for Madness&lt;/a&gt;, which is out of print in English but required reading in German public schools. As Umberto Eco notes in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html&quot;&gt;&quot;Eternal Fascism&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, this is a timeless tale of human nature.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24527</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conformity</category>
		<category>fascism</category>
		<category>highschool</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>RonJones</category>
		<category>school</category>
		<category>socialpsychology</category>
		<category>socialstudies</category>
		<category>TheThirdWave</category>
		<category>ThirdWave</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17763/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020611070813.htm"&gt;UMass Researcher Finds Most People Lie In Everyday Conversation&lt;/a&gt; UMass Researcher Finds Most People Lie In Everyday Conversation
&quot;Most people lie in everyday conversation when they are trying to appear likable and competent, according to a study conducted by University of Massachusetts psychologist Robert S. Feldman and published in the most recent Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology&#8230;The study also found that lies told by men and women differ in content, though not in quantity. Feldman said the results showed that men do not lie more than women or vice versa, but that men and women lie in different ways. &quot;Women were more likely to lie to make the person they were talking to feel good, while men lied most often to make themselves look better,&quot; Feldman said.&quot;


Are you a liar?  C&#8217;mon now, tell the truth.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17763</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:29:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>lying</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>RobertSFeldman</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>SocialPsychology</category>
		<dc:creator>martk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15374/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/06/opinion/06FRIE.html"&gt;A Grand Narrative&lt;/a&gt; &quot;When Hindus kill Muslims it&apos;s not a story, because there are a billion Hindus and they aren&apos;t part of the Muslim narrative. When Saddam murders his own people it&apos;s not a story, because it&apos;s in the Arab-Muslim family. But when a small band of Israeli Jews kills Muslims it sparks rage &#8212; a rage that must come from Muslims having to confront the gap between their self-perception as Muslims and the reality of the Muslim world.&quot; Thomas Friedman looks for an angle and finds a story! What role, if any, does &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erasmatazz.com/library/NarrativeSynthesis/Index.html&quot;&gt;narrative consciousness&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.mira.net/~kmurray/psych/in&amp;out.html&quot;&gt;social psychology&lt;/a&gt; play in the Middle East? (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogdex.media.mit.edu/browseSource.asp?url=http%3A//www.nytimes.com/2002/03/06/opinion/06FRIE.html&quot;&gt;blogdex&lt;/a&gt; :)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15374</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 08:24:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Islam</category>
		<category>killing</category>
		<category>Muslims</category>
		<category>narratives</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>socialpsychology</category>
		<category>ThomasFriedman</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


