<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with socialwelfare</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/socialwelfare</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'socialwelfare' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:44:32 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:44:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Please, sir, may I have some more?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54850/Please%2Dsir%2Dmay%2DI%2Dhave%2Dsome%2Dmore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.workhouses.org.uk/"&gt;Victorian Workhouses&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;I sometimes look up at the bit of blue sky&lt;br&gt;
High over my head, with a tear in my eye.&lt;br&gt;
Surrounded by walls that are too high to climb,&lt;br&gt;
Confined like a felon without any crime...&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54850</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 07:44:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dickens</category>
		<category>england</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>olivertwist</category>
		<category>poor</category>
		<category>poorhouse</category>
		<category>poverty</category>
		<category>reform</category>
		<category>socialwelfare</category>
		<category>victorian</category>
		<category>workhouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Miko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18855/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/ny-livit302803771jul30.column?coll=ny%2Dnews%2Dprint"&gt;Corporate Welfare and Social Welfare. &lt;/a&gt; Which is the most egregious?  A bill in Congress to address welfare got comments from GWB during a political fund raiser in SC.  Does this statement make any sense to you?

&quot;In the way they&apos;re kind of writing it right now out of the Senate Finance Committee, some people could spend their entire five years on welfare - there&apos;s a five-year work requirement - going to college. Now, that&apos;s not my view of helping people become independent, and it&apos;s certainly not my view of understanding the importance of work and helping people achieve the dignity necessary so they can live a free life, free from government control.&quot; -GWB- 

I always thought education WAS the key to escaping poverty but the &quot;education President&quot; obviously disagrees. I&apos;d really appreciate your comments on the bill and this article.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18855</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 08:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corporatewelfare</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>socialwelfare</category>
		<category>welfare</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


