<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with sociology and science</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/sociology+science</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'sociology' and 'science' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:18:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:18:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>How Do We Know What We Know?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80284/How%2DDo%2DWe%2DKnow%2DWhat%2DWe%2DKnow</link>
		<description> For most of us, science arrives in our lives packaged neatly as fact. But how did it get that way? Science is an active process of observation and investigation. &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.exploratorium.edu/evidence/lowbandwidth/index.html&quot;&gt;Evidence: How Do We Know What We Know?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;small&gt;[HTML version, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.exploratorium.edu/evidence/&quot;&gt;Flash version&lt;/a&gt; also available]&lt;/small&gt; examines that process, revealing the ways in which ideas and information become knowledge and understanding. In this case study in human origins, the folks from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eva.mpg.de/english/index.htm&quot;&gt;Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology&lt;/a&gt; explore how scientific evidence is being used to shape our current understanding of ourselves: What makes us human&#8212;and how did we get this way?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80284</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:18:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthropology</category>
		<category>evidence</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>exploratorium</category>
		<category>knowledge</category>
		<category>maxplanck</category>
		<category>origin</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>understanding</category>
		<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Theory of Humor | Why something is funny, why it sometimes is not, and when it crosses a line.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/66719/A%2DTheory%2Dof%2DHumor%2DWhy%2Dsomething%2Dis%2Dfunny%2Dwhy%2Dit%2Dsometimes%2Dis%2Dnot%2Dand%2Dwhen%2Dit%2Dcrosses%2Da%2Dline</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/humor.html"&gt;Theory of Humor.&lt;/a&gt; A scientific paper, written by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/&quot;&gt;Tom Veatch&lt;/a&gt;, describes his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/humor.html&quot;&gt;Theory of Humor&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node2.html&quot;&gt;When is something funny&lt;/a&gt;? When is it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node5.html&quot;&gt;not funny&lt;/a&gt;? When does it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node3.html&quot;&gt;cross the line&lt;/a&gt;? Why are puns &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node29.html&quot;&gt;generally shitty&lt;/a&gt;? And the mysterious and magical powers elephant jokes have on children, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper/node24.html&quot;&gt;revealed&lt;/a&gt;!

A great data set to use for practice in applying the theories presented in the paper can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15281/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.66719</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:48:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>funny</category>
		<category>gag</category>
		<category>humor</category>
		<category>joke</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>laughter</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>pun</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>theory</category>
		<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Metafilter: Best of the Web??</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45701/Metafilter%2DBest%2Dof%2Dthe%2DWeb</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1815107,00.html&quot;&gt;Research&lt;/a&gt; by dumb, ignorant Yankees on national &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9598717/&quot;&gt;stereotypes&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45701</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:16:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>nationality</category>
		<category>people</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<category>stereotypes</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>90% Matematch guaranteed or your money back</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41349/90%2DMatematch%2Dguaranteed%2Dor%2Dyour%2Dmoney%2Dback</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/gottman05/gottman05_index.html"&gt;The Mathematics of Love&lt;/a&gt; - predicting, with 90% accuracy, what will happen to a relationship over a three-year period.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41349</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:08:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>love</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<category>relationships</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Eat it, Rand.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40622/Eat%2Dit%2DRand</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/mg18524901.600"&gt;An evolutionary basis for altruism.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;These findings suggest that true altruism, far from being a maladaptation, may be the key to our species&apos; success by providing the social glue that allowed our ancestors to form strong, resilient groups.&lt;/em&gt;  Sharing isn&apos;t just caring, it&apos;s surviving.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40622</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>altruism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>gametheory</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>schroedinger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


